The Parallax View

It is an interesting situation in relation to what we call humanity. In the first place any particular referent to some absolute as to what we are can be questioned. What is strange about the human perspective is in relation the extent we are unwilling to relate, beyond what we do not as individuals, groups and so on....to what is apparent in nature.

In the way that it is strange I would point out that humans seem preoccupied with the idea they are, absolutely certain as to what is going on.

We are born into whatever it seems we exist in.


Perhaps it would be a good idea to address the problem with an open mind?

Any thoughts?

We are being influenced by

Ourselves
Hidden talking implant beings
Psychedelic gnomes
Governmental computers using methods
My poo

Consider all this as you consider the paralacs, a race of sharptoothed bone like beings who will ZERG your planet.

a reply to: anotherside

Parallax is a displacement or difference in the apparent position of an object viewed along two different lines of sight, and is measured by the angle or semi-angle of inclination between those two lines.[1][2] The term is derived from the Greek word παράλλαξις (parallaxis), meaning "alternation". Due to foreshortening, nearby objects show a larger parallax than farther objects when observed from different positions, so parallax can be used to determine distances.

en.wikipedia.org...


Then again there is EPR Paradox and subsequent to that, Bells Theorem.

originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: anotherside

Parallax is a displacement or difference in the apparent position of an object viewed along two different lines of sight, and is measured by the angle or semi-angle of inclination between those two lines.[1][2] The term is derived from the Greek word παράλλαξις (parallaxis), meaning "alternation". Due to foreshortening, nearby objects show a larger parallax than farther objects when observed from different positions, so parallax can be used to determine distances.

en.wikipedia.org...


Then again there is EPR Paradox and subsequent to that, Bells Theorem.

so our view of stars through earths atmospheric light bending properties, parallax is equated?

a reply to: anotherside


"A change in the observers point of view."

What's 96 Percent of the Universe Made Of? Astronomers Don't Know

www.space.com...

originally posted by: anotherside
We are being influenced by

Ourselves
Hidden talking implant beings
Psychedelic gnomes
Governmental computers using methods
My poo

Consider all this as you consider the paralacs, a race of sharptoothed bone like beings who will ZERG your planet.

All our base are belongs to them.

a reply to: Kashai



My thoughts are that was an incoherent babbling post . What are you on about? In plain English please

Is this a discussion on the information wrongness between a subjective view vs the objective reality and what tools can be used to minimize faith driven bias?

Even if the observer do change objective view by observing the objective reality still exists as potential outcome.

a reply to: LittleByLittle


Exactly.

‘Scientists only understand 4% of universe’

www.rt.com...

The problem in so far as mankind defines reality in general portends to some absolute which in consideration appears ridiculous.

To be clear that does not mean that our current cumulative knowledge of reality, would not seem like child's play. To some equivalent to the human condition in say a billion years from now..

originally posted by: anotherside
We are being influenced by

Ourselves
Hidden talking implant beings
Psychedelic gnomes
Governmental computers using methods
My poo

Consider all this as you consider the paralacs, a race of sharptoothed bone like beings who will ZERG your planet.

a reply to: norhoc



When it comes to defining reality in relation to such lofty considerations as to its meaning or even how it actually functions?


There is an apparently an inherent human tendency rationalize current comprehension of reality as more than what it really is.


Materialism being an example.

Not sure if you actually noticed or ar4e even paying attention but when it comes to History and human development that seems a consistence however misguided is apparently is.

a reply to: ausername


There is absolutely no way we can understand reality in a way that relates to reality as a whole, despite the fact we cannot as of yet, relate to ourselves as pure energy.

Poo, as E=mc squared where in the C2 component is relatable to Time squared.


More then happy to elaborate.

Any thoughts?