It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
Which will be a great motivator for some nation with a less appalling track record on committing acts of espionage, assassination, and economic destabilisation, against nations it would like to have the resources of, to build a navy capable of filling the gap.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
I live on the same planet you do Augustus...
...I just do not believe that continuing to accept unacceptable circumstances, actually achieves any positive outcomes.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
Peace at the cost of uninvited policing of international waters...
President of the United States=President of the World.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Practicality?
What possible relevance does that have? You want to talk practicality, lets talk about foreign policy choices for a moment. Increased drone strikes WILL create more terrorists than they kill, because they will kill more innocents than combatants, more orphaned children has always worked out to greater terrorism problems later on. Yet, more drone strikes are being enacted now, because Trump removed an Obama era policy which limited their use, even under his murderous reign. Couple that to the fact that the United States is STILL providing arms and money to Saudi Arabia, the middlemen who put those arms and funds in the hands of the very terror network that America CLAIMS to be fighting against, and you have a VERY impractical scenario there. The same military industrial complex which polices the worlds oceans, is the same MIC which creates the vast majority of the world wide threats it combats.
Tell me, with that level of criminality at its core, what is it that makes you think that it is in any way practical for the US Navy, an appendage of a blatantly corrupt government, to be the ones to police ANYTHING?