It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Jim Carrey is #Woak

page: 2
15
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 12:01 AM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults

Yeah, its the same principle, but the Body of Christ implies a deeper spiritual connection with God. Yet from the Biblical perspective, even non-believers share a basic ground-state connection with God. We are all said to be created in the spiritual image of God. If you read Colossians 1:15-20 in Greek you can see it. All things created in Christ, through Christ, for Christ, and held together in Christ.

John 1 touches on the same subject, and even states, "In Him was life, and the life was the Light of men." I interpret that as our souls being created from the very fabric of God's own life. But the statement in John 1 also seems to be a rearrangement of Proverbs 20:27, "The lamp of God is the breath of man, searching the hidden chambers of his belly (subconscious mind)." Very clever poetry.

So the concept of unity that Jim Carrey is just now becoming aware of is even found in the Bible, but so is individuality. So like the wave/particle duality of Quantum Field Theory, I also think there must be a duality of unity and individuality.

edit on 24-9-2017 by BELIEVERpriest because: (no reason given)




posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 12:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: BELIEVERpriest




Therefore, the most logical conclusion is that we are both united by the same medium, yet expressed as individuals.


Don't Christians say this what they mean when they say you have to be part of the body of Christ?


Not quite. In Revelation and other Biblical expositions of our spiritual future in Heaven, the Church is spoken of as a single being (the Bride of Christ) and this no doubt is because we are as a species coming together as a 'group mind'.

If you look at trends in communication, we are removing barriers between each other. The invention of emoji's to extend short form textual communications are a crude example. As we invent better haptics and neural links, we will technologically bring 'the other' closer into our personal mental space and at some stage, the boundaries will very much blur.

The internet and 20th century media are an incremental part of that change which is due to continue at least in the concievable future.

In fact, if you go back and reevaluate what makes sin 'sinful' the majority are because they would be a barrier to allowing others to know everything in our selves (part of personal guilt).

Obviously our natural tendencies are most likely to be in the plan of God for what we should become and so this agrees well with the Biblical descriptions of the future of humanity when we are 'perfected' beyond sin.



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 12:38 AM
link   
He puts all his energy into his artwork that's probably why. I don't really like it, but each artist is different.


edit on 24-9-2017 by Diabolical1972 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 03:25 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

If we define the self as the conscious inside talking awareness then the information of self is not static.

If we define the self as a separate conscious that includes:
1 conscious inside talking awareness that have a subjective belief filter
2 direct action awareness
3 logical/objective awareness
4 external information exchange
5 unknown parts of unconscious.

Then the self have ability to measure/information exchange with other parts of creation thru entanglement manipulation and the notion of self becomes problematic to separate from the whole due to the entanglement.

If we see the self as an iceberg in an ocean then "conscious inside talking awareness" would be above the see level and can be directly observed. The things below the surface have to be examined by allowing the information raise to conscious inside talking awareness. Part of the iceberg is because of the entangled information exchange both part of the iceberg and the ocean that it is connected to.



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 03:31 AM
link   
a reply to: LittleByLittle
There is no separate self - there is only what is happening.
Sensation is happening but the illusion is that sensation is 'happening to you'. That 'you' does not exist.



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 03:45 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Are ya'll being funny? Like, what?



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 03:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
Obviously our natural tendencies are most likely to be in the plan of God for what we should become and so this agrees well with the Biblical descriptions of the future of humanity when we are 'perfected' beyond sin.

This has nothing to do with 'becoming'. This is about the recognition of 'being'.
You are - you are being what you are - 'you' are not separate from all that is occurring. There is what there is - this is it. This is not later - in time - this is about this that already IS.
The word God implies timelessness (all presence). All seeing and all knowing can only happen now.

You may believe that it is 'you' that is seeing - 'you' as in that particular body/mind - but this that is is seeing and knowing this that is (this present appearance).
There is only presence seeing and knowing presence.

Words make believe there is another time to be known and seen - the future, the past. Thought can only speak about other times - so it divides now (this that is actual) into two - past and future and it can tell stories about 'what is not happening' all day long. But what is happening is not made of words - life is sensation.
edit on 24-9-2017 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 04:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: Justso
a reply to: chr0naut

Are ya'll being funny? Like, what?

Google: You do not exist.
Or click this link www.beyond-karma.com...

edit on 24-9-2017 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 04:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

originally posted by: Justso
a reply to: chr0naut

Are ya'll being funny? Like, what?

Google: You do not exist.
Or click this link www.beyond-karma.com...



Cogito ergo sum.

Ne dum tu conplexa est mendacium efficiunt officium.

Tu es ficta.




posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 04:30 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut
Sorry I cannot understand - would you please translate?

originally posted by: chr0nautIf you look at trends in communication, we are removing barriers between each other.

Not always - it seems!
edit on 24-9-2017 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 04:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

originally posted by: chr0naut
Obviously our natural tendencies are most likely to be in the plan of God for what we should become and so this agrees well with the Biblical descriptions of the future of humanity when we are 'perfected' beyond sin.

This has nothing to do with 'becoming'. This is about the recognition of 'being'.
You are - you are being what you are - 'you' are not separate from all that is occurring. There is what there is - this is it. This is not later - in time - this is about this that already IS.
The word God implies timelessness (all presence). All seeing and all knowing can only happen now.

You may believe that it is 'you' that is seeing - 'you' as in that particular body/mind - but this that is is seeing and knowing this that is (this present appearance).
There is only presence seeing and knowing presence.

Words make believe there is another time to be known and seen - the future, the past. Thought can only speak about other times - so it divides now (this that is actual) into two - past and future and it can tell stories about 'what is not happening' all day long. But what is happening is not made of words - life is sensation.


There are many timeless things that exist that are not God.

For example, the number three is timeless.

The fact that you think timelessness equates to omniprescence and to God only reveals how little reason you have applied to the subject.

When you think about something. Is the brain that is doing the thinking you? Then who is doing the observation of you thinking? and who is it that observes the observer of you thinking?

We each are a colony of thinkers, experiencers and observers in each person as we are a colony of cells in one body. Freud began to touch upon our many facetted selves and there are some who are aware but cannot reconcile their internal differences and we have the gall to call them psychotic.

Even so, as we are many, we are markedly different and distinct.

Time itself is timeless. The past, present and future exist unchangeably forever but our dim light of consciousness only illumines the shortest of our path.

This means that God, to our understandings of time, is changeless and knows the end from the beginning. God is not bound by time but time is directed by God. God can change time to His preference.

And we are not God. We are in the image of God like a photograph is in our image.

We are not coloured inks on a flat piece of paper, even though it may carry our image.

edit on 24/9/2017 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 05:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: chr0naut
Sorry I cannot understand - would you please translate?

originally posted by: chr0nautIf you look at trends in communication, we are removing barriers between each other.

Not always - it seems!


I think, therefore, I am.

When you decieve yourself on purpose.

It makes you the fiction.



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 05:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
And we are not God. We are in the image of God like a photograph is in our image.

There is only what is appearing - what is appearing is 'God' - this is the image of God.
The assumption is that there is a separate you seeing the image - but the statement states that you are made 'in' the image of God. The image of God is what is appearing - it is doing itself
So there is just the image of God - and within that image is a sub image (appearing in it) about someone that can live outside the image - the true image is here and now - the sub image is in time.
Have you ever stepped out of now? What is happening is happening? What is appearing 'in' this image of God is like anything that is appearing in a movie - there isn't anything 'in' the movie which has volition.

edit on 24-9-2017 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 07:25 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

I remember having barriers, chr0naut.

Now, im oddly telepathic, via enhanced auditory neural synthesis. I listen....very very carefully.

Heh, a "gift" im sure...

A gift that seems to make most perceive me as a demon, treating me worse than a homicidal, pedophilic rapist, whilst they themselves deceive me day in, and day out about it. Either that, or theyre unaware, in which case they damn me for reasons beyond their scope of understanding. Tiresome. Irrirating.

Why do i forgive these people regularly? Who's the demon, again?

Any hoo.

And you wouldnt believe the sea of coincidences Ive got to sail through on a daily basis.



News flash to self: no one cares.



Ill ramble some more for the hell of it because # it.

Lord knows the days when i couldnt control this stupid "gift"...total Hell. Suffering beyond most people's capacity to fathom. I am not joking.

Endless mockery and hostility from those i linked minds with. To be blunt, all they had to do was shut the # up. I want to say maybe .1% of people figured that out, and even then, most of those few still harbored horrible intentions.

The nerve of some people...lots of people.



So...

As it is, if i were the gate keeper, id probably laugh at a lot of people begging for entrance to Heaven, holding a napkin with the written true good deeds of their's, and a 666 page tome of their bad deeds.

Buuuuuuut, im already living in Hell as far as im concerned. My mind is no longer private and people treat it like a spiritual punching bag.

I realize this post is a total waste of time and energy, as im just a crazy nutter with a bad reputation. Sue me.


Except you few awakened souls. You know who you are...you're not alone. Hang tight. Remember, everyone gets what they deserve in the end...







posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 10:26 AM
link   
Sounds a lot like what Alan Watts taught.

We're not a drop in the ocean, we're the entire ocean in a drop. I like that.



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 10:36 AM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults

It seems like he is following someone else's idea/path, but I do hope he will, one day, break free and realize his meaning all by himself.



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 01:41 PM
link   
a reply to: BELIEVERpriest

Woah man it seems your outlook has changed


Great post I agree, the individual doesn't need to go away. Just transforms



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 01:43 PM
link   
Jim carey is woak? That's not how you spell ewok.



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 02:17 PM
link   
a reply to: zardust

Its more like my outlook has become more refined, or better yet updated. Lately, I've been getting into Quantum Field Theory, incommensurability, and fractal self similarity. I simply realized that these scientific principles are also mirrored in the spiritual principles of the Bible. I still believe in Heaven and Hell...salvation (through Christ) and spiritual death . However, instead of viewing it as unity versus isolation, I now see it as degree of unity versus degree of isolation.

Even the Biblical concept of Heaven has varying degrees of unity and isolation. Unity being the kingdom. Isolation being the Outer Darkness, as illustrated when Moses had to look upon the Promised Land from Mount Pisgah.

This principle of "degree of separation" is further illustrated by Jesus Himself.





Luke 7:
41“A moneylender had two debtors: one owed five hundred denarii, and the other fifty. 42“When they were unable to repay, he graciously forgave them both. So which of them will love him more?” 43Simon answered and said, “I suppose the one whom he forgave more.” And He said to him, “You have judged correctly.” 44Turning toward the woman, He said to Simon, “Do you see this woman? I entered your house; you gave Me no water for My feet, but she has wet My feet with her tears and wiped them with her hair. 45“You gave Me no kiss; but she, since the time I came in, has not ceased to kiss My feet. 46“You did not anoint My head with oil, but she anointed My feet with perfume. 47“For this reason I say to you, her sins, which are many, have been forgiven, for she loved much; but he who is forgiven little, loves little.”

edit on 24-9-2017 by BELIEVERpriest because: typos



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 02:31 PM
link   
a reply to: BELIEVERpriest

That's what I was going to say "updated" or elevated but didn't want to imply your old way was wrong or inferior (even with our many disagreements).




new topics




 
15
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join