It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hillary Clinton: Women Are ‘Publicly Disrespecting Themselves’ by Supporting Trump

page: 5
32
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 11:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: carewemust

There was a time where I honestly thought she'd have Bill killed to gain the sympathy vote.

She still has time to off Bill before the next election.




posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 11:54 AM
link   
Can someone please tell this scum she's not the spokesperson for American women?



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 11:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: TDawg61

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: carewemust

There was a time where I honestly thought she'd have Bill killed to gain the sympathy vote.

She still has time to off Bill before the next election.


Bill is writing a book too..."The President is Missing" lol (how appropriate a title)



It was announced today that the former president is working on a book titled The President Is Missing with best-selling author James Patterson. The political thriller "will offer readers a unique amalgam of intrigue, suspense and behind-the-scenes global drama from the highest corridors of power," read a press release from Alfred A. Knopf and Little, Brown and Company who will jointly publish the novel in June of 2018.


www.townandcountrymag.com...



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 12:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: face23785
Can someone please tell this scum she's not the spokesperson for American women?


Ah but yes she is a spokesperson for American women, but not for the non-educated white American women it appears.



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 12:40 PM
link   
a reply to: InTheLight

Still seeing everything through lenses of color and gender eh? MLK would be rolling over in his grave.



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 12:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: InTheLight

Still seeing everything through lenses of color and gender eh? MLK would be rolling over in his grave.


Not I, I just read the voting statistics.



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 01:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: face23785
Can someone please tell this scum she's not the spokesperson for American women?


Ah but yes she is a spokesperson for American women, but not for the non-educated white American women it appears.


Not exactly.

The dividing line for who women vote tends to be along whether or not women are married more than along the lines of how educated they are.

Single woman of all educational levels are far more likely to vote Democrat while married ones are far more likely to vote Republican.



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 01:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: face23785
Can someone please tell this scum she's not the spokesperson for American women?


Ah but yes she is a spokesperson for American women, but not for the non-educated white American women it appears.


Not exactly.

The dividing line for who women vote tends to be along whether or not women are married more than along the lines of how educated they are.

Single woman of all educational levels are far more likely to vote Democrat while married ones are far more likely to vote Republican.


That is an interesting point, because other factors in voting choice for women, as per Hillary, may be 1. being manipulated by the men in their lives, or 2. caving in to avoid relationship/family tensions. But, as per the voting statistics in 2016, it was non-educated white women that made up the majority.



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 02:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
What the hell does being white have to do with not liking Hillary?

I'm white, and I don't like 99% of all politicians. Male, female, white, black, tan... I don't discriminate.

Just because people hold an opinion doesn't give you the right to accuse them of being bigots.

She has plenty of reasons for people not to like her.


i didn't accuse anyone of being bigots. i just observed that obsession with hating hillary is primarily an occupation of older white men.



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 02:17 PM
link   
Has she seen a feminist rally?



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 02:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: fiverx313

Well lets be fair here...she was not elected. But she was helping to form policy directly.

Thats bad enough...worse is that people dont see the problem with it and its commonplace now. And fwiw...i think Nancys egg frying campaign shouldnt habe happened either. She was running propaganda on the public in violation of the law.


i think your point is valid but many people apply it only along party lines.



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 02:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
Wouldn't you think if she had some respect for herself as a woman that she would have ditched the man long ago? And yet here she is still married to a prime example of a man who who constantly disrespects women, including her. And unlike with Donald's accusers, Bill's constantly follow him around trying to get justice.

Basically, my point is that this is a classic example of "do as I say, not as I do."


relationships are complicated. sometimes someone cheats and people stay together and sometimes they separate. you don't know what goes on between two people, so it's hard to judge from the outside.

and considering that conservative wingnuts have boosted those women and turned them into a grievance industry of their own -- up to donald wanting to seat them in his family box at the debate -- it's hard to say how much 'following around' would be done if they weren't being propped up by opposition to the democratic party in general.

you people have a hate-on for the clintons like nothing i've ever seen. you rant about them when they're not even on the horizon.



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 02:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: NobodiesNormal




its interesting you want people to blame the op for posting things about hillary, its like you have an interest in defending her...

No. Like I said, I didn't watch the show. I don't really have any interest in what Clinton has to say.

It's more a matter of being tired of the OP. But that's just me.


You don't have to click on the thread...

But we know your compulsions



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 02:29 PM
link   
Everyone needs to just...



Especially Hillary.




posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 02:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: ausername
Everyone needs to just...



Especially Hillary.



I disagree. Everyone needs to understand what happened and what may happen again - learn from past mistakes comes to mind.



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 04:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: fiverx313

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
What the hell does being white have to do with not liking Hillary?

I'm white, and I don't like 99% of all politicians. Male, female, white, black, tan... I don't discriminate.

Just because people hold an opinion doesn't give you the right to accuse them of being bigots.

She has plenty of reasons for people not to like her.


i didn't accuse anyone of being bigots. i just observed that obsession with hating hillary is primarily an occupation of older white men.


Well, we just had the two worst candidates face off against each other.

I'm 28, and many of my friends hate her.

To be honest, I haven't had a president in my lifetime I support.

We hemorrhage money through the military to benefit an agenda while the middle class and wages have stayed stagnant or declined while productivity increases.

I'm not some young socialist, but it's obvious that capatalist doesn't succeed when unlimited money can make its way to buy politicians, and lobbyists can write bills.

Both sides are in on it, they all just want reelection.

But you're helping out a lot by bringing race into the argument, very productive.

You tell me why people shouldn't hate her, or any other establishment politicians for that matter. I bet my counter list would win.



posted on Sep, 24 2017 @ 04:35 PM
link   
a reply to: InTheLight

So basically, because I am married and see where the money goes at tax time, money that *could* be used to put food on our table, clothing on our backs, or pay for our child's health care and education but instead goes to government which has deemed other people's children more worthy of those things ...

I am being manipulated by my husband instead of being capable of seeing the figures and understanding what they represent for myself?

And you think I am the only woman out there who understands how the current government tax and spend structure hurts the middle class who is largely comprised of married families just doing their best to live life correctly by earning our own way in life and saving up to pay for our kids the way it was intended to be?

How very, very insulting you are.



posted on Sep, 25 2017 @ 01:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: InTheLight

So basically, because I am married and see where the money goes at tax time, money that *could* be used to put food on our table, clothing on our backs, or pay for our child's health care and education but instead goes to government which has deemed other people's children more worthy of those things ...

I am being manipulated by my husband instead of being capable of seeing the figures and understanding what they represent for myself?

And you think I am the only woman out there who understands how the current government tax and spend structure hurts the middle class who is largely comprised of married families just doing their best to live life correctly by earning our own way in life and saving up to pay for our kids the way it was intended to be?

How very, very insulting you are.


I am just pointing out a few ideas from Hillary's book on what may have happened during the elections as to why non-educated white women were the majority voting for Trump (married or not). I happen to think how and why people vote as they do is very interesting, and what Hillary has to say is an interesting slant on the psychology of voting.

If you don't agree with it, then say so, there is no need to call me insulting when I simply want to discuss if these are legitimate factors that are brought up in Hillary's book. Which, I believe, may have merit, especially women 'caving in' to keep the peace in the family when tempers and tensions were running high at election time, because that is what we do, try to keep a stable/happy home/work life. If it didn't happen to you, good on you, but you do not speak for all American women, just yourself. And it just wasn't non-educated white men and women, but the wealthy voted for Trump too who couldn't care less about your middle-American money woes.

www.theguardian.com...



Voting also marks our membership in a larger group. Social pressure has been found to be a major influence on many people’s decision to vote. People are often motivated to vote because they want to fit in. “This social pressure can come from many sources, most notably parents, friends, and romantic partners,” Avant says. “Even employers and religious leaders can impact our political decisions. “One of the greatest antecedents of social influence is status,” she adds. “People who are perceived as credible and intelligent are more likely to impact our decisions.”


source.southuniversity.edu...



Research suggests that marriage generally shifts individuals’ attitudes and behaviors. For example, evidence shows married women become more conservative on gender-related issues over the course of their marriage and perceive themselves as having less in common with other women. In part, this captures the fact that many married couples become more similar to each other in their attitudes and behaviors.


theconversation.com...

edit on 19CDT01America/Chicago02410130 by InTheLight because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2017 @ 01:23 PM
link   
a reply to: InTheLight

Actually, you were extremely condescending and insulting. And If you don't want to be called "insulting", then you shouldn't insult people. Simple.

Also, you didn't say a word about pointing out "a few ideas" from Hillary's delusional book when you delivered your insult. The words were your own, so have some spine and own up to them.



posted on Sep, 25 2017 @ 01:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: ReadingOne
a reply to: InTheLight

Actually, you were extremely condescending and insulting. And If you don't want to be called "insulting", then you shouldn't insult people. Simple.

Also, you didn't say a word about pointing out "a few ideas" from Hillary's delusional book when you delivered your insult. The words were your own, so have some spine and own up to them.



You are wrong because I clearly posted 'as per Hillary', go back and read it again and then you can apologize.
edit on 19CDT01America/Chicago02710130 by InTheLight because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
32
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join