It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: underwerks
It's kind of crazy to see the president of the united states call someone a "son of a b####" and want them to lose their job all because they chose to exercise their freedom of speech.
I guess that's what everyone voted for, though.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: HeadCrunchMcRockGroin
Welcome freshly minted ATS member!
A> You're mixing up your statistics.
B> They're protesting in solidarity with the belief that Black Americans are treated differently by the legal system and police forces ... which is evidentially true no matter which stat you look at.
The pledge itself would prove malleable, and by World War II many public schools required a morning recitation. In 1954, as the cold war intensified, Congress added the words “under God” to distinguish the United States from “godless Communism.”
Yet the pledge continues to have its critics, with some pointing out the irony of requiring citizens to swear fealty to a nation that prizes freedom of thought and speech.
you have to first overcome a whole life of indoctrination telling you that when someone in a uniform tells you to do something, you do it.
This kind of obedience is no accident. It starts off as an intentional process from childhood.
In school you were taught to sit down, shut up, and do whatever your teacher said. The lesson from day number one was to take orders without thinking about them.
If you grew up in the United States, you likely started your day off with your hand over your heart proclaiming your fealty to your nation—whatever that was—and the piece of tri-colored cloth by which it was represented. Before you could understand what any of the words in the Pledge of Allegiance meant, you knew them by heart.
That was exactly the point.
Aiming to instill patriotism and obedience in children early on, Francis Bellamy, the socialist minister who penned the Pledge, made sure to keep it brief and with good cadence so it would be easily memorized.
The Nazi salute and the indoctrination of children? Yep, that was the US’s idea first. Thus, the same blind obedience given to those in uniforms is also given to actions commanded under the name of the American flag.
Francis Bellamy, the socialist minister
Add in the fact that the NFL received millions of taxpayer dollars from the Department of Defense and the National Guard for patriotic displays, and it puts the entire Kaepernick hullabaloo in a different light.
"Fans should have confidence that their hometown heroes are being honored because of their honorable military service, not as a marketing ploy," Senator John McCain, the Vietnam War veteran and P.O.W., saidin a statement last year coinciding with "Tackling Paid Patriotism," a joint oversight report released by McCain and his fellow Arizona Republican Senator John Flake.
WHAT'S TRUE
NFL players were not required to be on the field during the playing of the U.S. national anthem prior to 2009.
WHAT'S FALSE
Players always had the option of standing on the sidelines during the playing of the national anthem if they so chose.
The practice of “paid patriotism” came to light on 30 April 2015, when Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) released a statement chiding the New Jersey Army National Guard for paying between $97,000 and $115,000 to the New York Jets for a series of promotions involving military personnel. That November, Flake and fellow Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain issued a report stating that the Defense Department had been paying for patriotic displays in football and other sports between 2011 and 2014
However, this report did not cover the year 2009, so it is unclear whether NFL teams’ appearing on the field for the playing of the national anthem truly began in conjunction with the “paid patriotism” policy. We have contacted both Sen. Flake and the NFL regarding this issue but have not received any responses
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: Phage
I can't watch vids at this time.
originally posted by: Phage
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: Phage
I can't watch vids at this time.
Take your time.
But yes, he said it.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: HeadCrunchMcRockGroin
Well, you muddled through your claim and seem to be saying that Blacks kill 13% of the population ... maybe you were just in a hurry.
You have zero evidence that anyone "commits more crime." If you actually are aware of statistics, you can say that Blacks are arrested more often and convicted more often ... but that just proves the point that the protesters are making.
And you end up with a silly argument that no one has made; no one has said "white racists are the problem."
What a waste of a throw-away account.
Why, I ask again, Why, is protesting the national anthem, going to further the movement to end police brutality. It's not gonna make diddly squat happen, apart from everyone going "What's this tosser doing?" and them tuning out.
originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: Onslaught9966
Ya see it's easier for lazy "patriots" to stand or defend the flag or say a pledge than actually do something patriotic.
originally posted by: pthena
a reply to: badw0lf
Because?
Do explain.
Sports events are not significant to national identity.
The right to peaceably assemble clause of the 1st amendment does not require explicit demonstrations of proof that the assembly (such as athletes and spectators) is not gathered for purposes of insurrection. Those demonstrations of loyalty are voluntarily done for fear that the authorities may get the wrong idea and open fire.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: HeadCrunchMcRockGroin
Welcome freshly minted ATS member!
A> You're mixing up your statistics.
B> They're protesting in solidarity with the belief that Black Americans are treated differently by the legal system and police forces ... which is evidentially true no matter which stat you look at.