It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hillary Clinton Calls Out Putin’s Manspreading With Perfect Demonstration

page: 3
15
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 11:43 AM
link   
Hillary is an awful, misandrist pig. This is more evidence.

Loathe is not a strong enough word.




posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 11:51 AM
link   
a reply to: introvert




Manspreading is an action, not someone's "looks".


Correct, a man does the "spreading".

Hillary was looking at Putin. Concentrating on his looks, it's called judging a book by it's cover.

Need more explanation?



posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 12:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: introvert




Manspreading is an action, not someone's "looks".


Correct, a man does the "spreading".

Hillary was looking at Putin. Concentrating on his looks, it's called judging a book by it's cover.



She was commenting on his actions. His demeanor. Not judging him by his looks.



Need more explanation?


No. Your absurdity need not be explained further.



posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 12:18 PM
link   
I'm just trying to get it straight - are we supposed to get easily offended by everything, or not?

Cuz if we are, then Hobby Lobby is of the devil and should be boycotted, and if we aren't, then what Hillary said is pretty much a non-issue.

So, which is it?



posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 12:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: kaylaluv
I'm just trying to get it straight - are we supposed to get easily offended by everything, or not?

Cuz if we are, then Hobby Lobby is of the devil and should be boycotted, and if we aren't, then what Hillary said is pretty much a non-issue.

So, which is it?


Which would you prefer ?




posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 12:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: introvert




Manspreading is an action, not someone's "looks".


Correct, a man does the "spreading".

Hillary was looking at Putin. Concentrating on his looks, it's called judging a book by it's cover.



She was commenting on his actions. His demeanor. Not judging him by his looks.



Need more explanation?


No. Your absurdity need not be explained further.


Oh she did it with out looking at him? She SAW his manspreading. Simple.



posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 12:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: seasonal

Umm, I can figure out why. Can't you?

Maybe not, so I'll spell it out for you. Do you know why men spread their legs when they sit? So they don't squish their "package". The assumption is, the bigger their package is, the wider they have to spread. So Hillary says that Putin was spreading extra EXTRA wide. What do you think he was trying to prove?

It was a joke. On the Colbert show. Go figure.


Thank you, after 57 years of being a man I never knew...Thought I was just cooling things down.



posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 12:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: kaylaluv
I'm just trying to get it straight - are we supposed to get easily offended by everything, or not?

Cuz if we are, then Hobby Lobby is of the devil and should be boycotted, and if we aren't, then what Hillary said is pretty much a non-issue.

So, which is it?


Which would you prefer ?



What do you think?



posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 12:34 PM
link   
oh no, hillary said something... time for all the old men to clutch their junk and make tired old jokes because a smart, successful woman who doesn't play to your fragile little ego is the scariest thing on earth.




posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 12:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: seasonal

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: introvert




Manspreading is an action, not someone's "looks".


Correct, a man does the "spreading".

Hillary was looking at Putin. Concentrating on his looks, it's called judging a book by it's cover.



She was commenting on his actions. His demeanor. Not judging him by his looks.



Need more explanation?


No. Your absurdity need not be explained further.


Oh she did it with out looking at him? She SAW his manspreading. Simple.


Yes, she saw his actions and was not judging him by his looks.

Unless you are trying to say she was judging him by his looks because she physically looked at him.

But you're not trying to say that, are you?



posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 12:36 PM
link   
a reply to: seasonal


Her husband Bill spreads.



posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 12:40 PM
link   
a reply to: seasonal

After Greg Giraldo passed away Hillary is easily the most hilarious person alive.



posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 01:00 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

She was judging how wide his body (legs spread) was situated or how it looked.


Yes, she saw his actions and was not judging him by his looks.



posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 01:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: introvert

She was judging how wide his body (legs spread) was situated or how it looked.


Yes, she saw his actions and was not judging him by his looks.


How the action looked and how she perceived it, yes.

Judging him based on his outward appearance, which you are implying, no.

Honestly, this is stupid.

This thread, your assertions, absurd.

But anything to get a good jab in on Hillary, huh?



posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 01:36 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Seems simple enough that hillary is making judgments on how Putin was sitting.



posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 01:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: introvert

She was judging how wide his body (legs spread) was situated or how it looked.


Yes, she saw his actions and was not judging him by his looks.


How the action looked and how she perceived it, yes.

Judging him based on his outward appearance, which you are implying, no.

Honestly, this is stupid.

This thread, your assertions, absurd.

But anything to get a good jab in on Hillary, huh?
Someone needs to jabber, Bill won't



posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 01:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: introvert

Seems simple enough that hillary is making judgments on how Putin was sitting.
She obviously has no idea what goes on between a man's legs



posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 01:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: fiverx313
oh no, hillary said something... time for all the old men to clutch their junk and make tired old jokes because a smart, successful woman who doesn't play to your fragile little ego is the scariest thing on earth.



Smart you say? Get a room with her.
"Did you wipe your email server?"
Hillary: "Like with a cloth or something?"
She is either the dumbest idiot or the biggest liar....take your pick.




posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 02:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: introvert

Seems simple enough that hillary is making judgments on how Putin was sitting.


Sitting, of course. That does not indicate she was judging his book by his cover, which is an entirely different accusation.



posted on Sep, 20 2017 @ 02:13 PM
link   
a reply to: kaylaluv

Well I always thought it was because the hips are more narrow in men and sitting with legs closed puts strain on the femoral head.

But what the hell do I know




top topics



 
15
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join