It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MantheDevilsApe
originally posted by: MantheDevilsApe
see?, we don't have a "scarcity of jobs" problem, or a "stagnation / low wages" problem. We have a "people" problem. There are too many of us. And letting literally millions of other "people" is increasing the "people problem" exponentially. Grime as it may be, it will eventually come down to "us or them".
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: pavil
Yes it is quite the conundrum. It just doesn't add up. And it hasn't added up for decades and decades. Yet as cut and dried as your question is, it still does not take into account the larger problems. What, with immigrants and robotics and automation and off shore out sourcing, what will happen to all the people who can't get jobs because those jobs are not there.
A traditional conservative talking point in this has been that the people who don't have jobs is because they are lazy and do not want to work or work only when they want to work or any number of other 'place the blame on the undeserving worker argument''. And the old liberal point has been go to college, get more schooling so that you can compete in the system.
The answer to the problem of low wages and lack of work due to the points you mention 'cannot be solved because the whole system of supply and demand is out dated. Especially when that very supply and demand is so easily manipulated by those who are in CONTROL of the supply and demand cycle.
edit on 08/022017 by MantheDevilsApe because: D'oh!
originally posted by: pavil
......I guess we can all have a job in the real "Resistance" then.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: pavil
Its pretty simple: deign the minimum wage to be $15/hr, and watch the value of the dollar adjust. $5 will be the new $1, and pennys won't be used anymore.
What would your solution be, out of curiosity? Do you think that a nation that had a thriving middle class 2 generations ago is going to make working the fields the new middle class job market? Is that where we, as a nation are headed?
originally posted by: conscientiousobserver
a reply to: pavil
There wouldn't be millions of illegals if there weren't hundreds of companies that hired them. I have seen this first hand. Companies that hire illegal immigrants because they are willing to weld for $12/ an hour in horrible conditions. Yet they proudly say their products are made in America. Conveniently leaving out the fact that 70% of their workforce is non American and at least 50% are illegal. It's ridiculous and can be directly related to capitalism and the lack of regulation. Both Republican ideals.
This is why we need to invest in education. As an educated population allows for advanced innovation and for entrepreneurship to expand exponentially. Which would create far more jobs in manufacturing, shipping, customer service, and retail than cutting taxes for fortune 500 companies.
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: pavil
Its pretty simple: deign the minimum wage to be $15/hr, and watch the value of the dollar adjust. $5 will be the new $1, and pennys won't be used anymore.
What would your solution be, out of curiosity? Do you think that a nation that had a thriving middle class 2 generations ago is going to make working the fields the new middle class job market? Is that where we, as a nation are headed?
I don't know where we are headed and I'm not for a mandated by govt. Minimum wage. All it would do is like you said, find a new value for the dollar. I don't even see how UBI would work where some are still working and the rest on the dole. Anyone here think the Rich will give up their power and wealth to have UBI?
I honestly don't see how society functions with 70 to 50% employment, which seems to be where we are headed. If I had the answers, I'd be a rich man and people would be wanting to take my obscene wealth.
Maybe Musk is right, let's move to Mars.
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Aazadan
The real resistance is as simple as drive the car you are driving for another couple of years.
Fix the vacuum instead of buying a new one.
Don't buy anything unless you will literally die with out it.
This would be a blow that would have the "consumer" in the drivers seat in short order.
I don't see how in today's world one can be for illegal Immigration as automation chips away hard at existing jobs. If you want to raise wages, the market has to eventually support that increased wage. Some people want to have it both ways.
Your thoughts?
A for-example.. in California, farmers are finding it so difficult right now to find people willing to work for them, even after raising the pay to 16 bucks an hour, they are having to cut out crops they'd normally grow. Even offering more benefits now.. higher pay.. a solid year-round salary.. and they can't get enough workers
originally posted by: conscientiousobserver
a reply to: Aazadan
My point was that an educated populace would create more welding positions as well as many other positions. Including those that require higher learning. Back to the welding many big companies require their welders to be certified which requires classroom time. Which creates more teaching jobs as well.
Lastly my father in law is a welder/ journeyman for the pipefitters union and has to go through a lot of classroom training to do his job in nuclear plants across the world. He now makes over $100,000 a year because he was able to get a higher level of education in his field of work. Allowing him to work on projects much more complicated than welding steel carts together for $25,000 a year.
Minimum Wage History. A federal minimum wage was first set in 1938. The graph shows nominal (blue diamonds) and real (red squares) minimum wage values. Nominal values range from $0.25/hr in 1938 to the current $7.25/hr.
Minimum Wage Would Be $21.72 If It Kept Pace With Increases In Productivity: Study says
www.huffingtonpost.com...