It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Charles and Camilla to marry.

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:
JAK

posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 03:18 AM
link   
Clarence House has just announced that Prince Charles is to marry Camilla Parker Bowles.

BBC LATEST: Prince Charles to marry Camilla Parker Bowles, Clarence House says. More soon...

Although this might some as a surprise to some, it doens not to me. For a long time now I have believed that it is the intention to place the very popular Prince William on the throne rather than Prince Charles. This marriage will distance Charles even further from many who still remember Princess Diana with a fondness.




posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 03:25 AM
link   
Umm, not to insult the brittish, or sound like a stupid American, but I gotta ask you...

Whats the deal with them? The queen and Prince and blah blah blah. Do they really have any sort of power? Why all the attention, and privilige? What do they do? Back in the day sure, but now a days? Why does it matter if its Charles or William? They dont really have any power, and arent elected, so why does it matter, or, should I say, why do you guys care so much? Neat press fodder, but not much else...

Somebody educate me !!


JAK

posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 03:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by spliff4020
Umm, not to insult the brittish, or sound like a stupid American,...


That will be British with a capital B then.


There have been many in the UK recently who have questioned the role of the royals in today's society and it is a contentious issue among the population of this island.

The main justification offered over recent years is that of preserving tradition, the money that is raised through tourism and the royals effectiveness in the promotion of British interests abroad.

Jack

[edit on 10/2/05 by JAK]



posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 03:37 AM
link   
Somebody caught that quick...lol I didnt do it intentionaly, but after I saw it, i thought "leave it in and see how fast they notice"..not bad..

Anyrate, thanks for the info. What your saying is that they dont do anything. Wow...wonder what they cost you a year..lol..Be better to toss them on their rears and open the castles up. I went there a couple years ago. Looked thru the gates..Neat country. West Minster rocked.


JAK

posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 04:00 AM
link   
Hey spliff4020, here's an insight into popular opinion in the UK:


source - BBC News
Last year, a poll indicated that more Britons support Prince Charles marrying Camilla Parker Bowles than oppose it.

Of those who responded to a Populus poll, 32% said they would support Charles if he remarried, while 29 percent were opposed.

However, most people - 38% - said they did not care, while 2% had no opinion


Jack



posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 04:07 AM
link   
Okay! I won't hide my dislike for Charles. He has been having an affair with this woman, since 1970. She was even at his wedding to Princess Diana, who I believe may have been murdered at his hands! To say he is going to marry her, and that she will be Prince William and Harry's stepmother is amost pushing them aside, and not taking their feelings into account. Why I say this is, it was in the tabloids when Prince william and Harry were old enough to understand that their father was having an affair behind their mother's back, and to say that it must have been hard and difficult for them to deal with mentally , while being in the public eye is like saying let the onion burn your eyes over and over the pain will go away in time!
He I believe is not only an unfit father to the two boys by doing what he did while being next in line to be King, he has no morals.
If a man who is to be king, is to lead a country, and suggest that he knows best for the British, is a lie! He did not even know how to deal with his marriage to a woman who was nothing but kind, naive and loved him. Maybe if she had been like Camilla, she would still be alive today!

Thank the Lord William will sit on the throne~

[edit on 10-2-2005 by realorritt]



posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 04:24 AM
link   
As for what power the royal family have, it's almost none existent. They live their over-indulgent, inbred lives because it's great for British tourism and that's about it ( although apparantly they still have Canada by the balls
)

As for Charles and Camilla marrying, my first reaction after seeing my inbox being crammed with this crap was "Who cares?!". There are alot of sad people out there who put there foot down simply because they "loved" Diana for some bizarre royal fetish thing reason. She shook hands with a leper once and Charles didn't, so of course he's the devil.

Don't get me wrong I think he's a prat, but as far as I'm concerned he can marry anyone he wants and I don't want to have to hear about it everywhere I go...so what?

Another thing is that, and let's be honest here, you don't get much uglier than Camilla where as Diana was attractive by that standard set lol. So for Charles to cheat on Diana with Camilla and to still be with her today he obviously loves the woman as it's got to be more than attraction surely (must be a great personality), so let's just let them get on with it...it's no big deal...



posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 04:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by John Nada
As for what power the royal family have, it's almost none existent. They live their over-indulgent, inbred lives because it's great for British tourism and that's about it ( although apparantly they still have Canada by the balls
)

As for Charles and Camilla marrying, my first reaction after seeing my inbox being crammed with this crap was "Who cares?!". There are alot of sad people out there who put there foot down simply because they "loved" Diana for some bizarre royal fetish thing reason. She shook hands with a leper once and Charles didn't, so of course he's the devil.

Don't get me wrong I think he's a prat, but as far as I'm concerned he can marry anyone he wants and I don't want to have to hear about it everywhere I go...so what?

Another thing is that, and let's be honest here, you don't get much uglier than Camilla where as Diana was attractive by that standard set lol. So for Charles to cheat on Diana with Camilla and to still be with her today he obviously loves the woman as it's got to be more than attraction surely (must be a great personality), so let's just let them get on with it...it's no big deal...


Hey! You know, I am Canadian,eh... and I do not feel Charles hands on my dress! In fact I would cut them off if I did!


When you say he couldn't get much uglier than Camilla so then, he must love her....well, ya, I think it's because she makes him look
pretty in the tabloids!

Maybe he'll turn into a handsome Prince on their wedding night?


[edit on 10-2-2005 by realorritt]



posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 04:46 AM
link   
Really who cares, I mean its a difference of cultures, In america we confine our inbred idiots to appalachia, in the UK they call em royals.



posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 04:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by realorritt
When you say he couldn't get much uglier than Camilla so then, he must love her....well, ya, I think it's because she makes him look
pretty in the tabloids!

Maybe he'll turn into a handsome Prince on their wedding night?



Yes it's true Charles ain't exactly budding in the looks department, but the sad fact is that he's a Prince worth millions and could pretty much take his pick of any woman wanted within reason (money grabbing, high society types anyway) whereas Camilla could not. So for him to go for her shows there must be something there...

As for the royal family having Canada, I can't believe there's a Canadian who actually took the bait on that wind up, I was just taking the piss hence the tongue.

Relax...don't do it.


[edit on 10-2-2005 by John Nada]



posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 05:07 AM
link   
Yes it's true Charles ain't exactly budding in the looks department, but the sad fact is that he's a Prince worth millions and could pretty much take his pick of any woman wanted within reason (money grabbing, high society types anyway) whereas Camilla could not. So for him to go for her shows there must be something there...

I have never seen Charles with any 'socialites', have you? I mean, I don't think after having Diana, he went on looks, he is looking for what he got,
someone who won't make more headlines in the press than him. I think that was the downfall really, besides having loved Camilla. Diana left Charles in the shadows when he felt he should be in the limelight, the headline of the day.
But, hey, once a cheat always a cheat, I wonder who will be his his next victim once he's maried, after all he can have a 'lover' he is royalty. I pity whoever it is.



posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 05:16 AM
link   
Well it was always going to happen, some people will see it as the end of the World, but once it happens well people will accept it as sure as the Sun will rise to-morrow. But what about the Church? What about the Goverment? What about his Sons, What about Mummy has he told her? Will she become a Queen? Got no time for the man Spineless & Gutless. Remember a standing prick has no conscience............



posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 05:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by Asteroid
Well it was always going to happen, some people will see it as the end of the World, but once it happens well people will accept it as sure as the Sun will rise to-morrow. But what about the Church? What about the Goverment? What about his Sons, What about Mummy has he told her? Will she become a Queen? Got no time for the man Spineless & Gutless. Remember a standing prick has no conscience............



From what Cnn.com, says,Charles would be the supreme governor of the Church of England if he took the throne, and some Anglicans remain opposed to the remarriage of divorcees.

www.cnn.com...

His sons, what could they say to their father? I expect that William will not be happy, but, he will have to put a smile on for the cameras, click click, as they will be doing all the time until the marriage on April 8th.
As far as the Queen, she has given them both her 'blessing."
I am royally piffed!
I am a huge fan of Diana, and the work she did with the Aids victims, the poor and the landmines she made known to the world about well, at least to me as I had no idea about them and how they mangled those people
Camilla will not become Queen! SHe will have the title, HRH, but if Charles becomes King, she will noot be known as the Queen, but as a Duchess I believe..not sure..

edit: When Charles becomes King, Camilla will not be known as Queen Camilla but as the Princess Consort.

[edit on 10-2-2005 by realorritt]



posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 06:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by mwm1331
Really who cares, I mean its a difference of cultures, In america we confine our inbred idiots to appalachia, in the UK they call em royals.


Spot on, I think I've devoted far too much time to the subject already but...

if you think Charles in his early manhood wasn't getting into every beautiful woman who wanted him behind the scenes you must be mad...

Get married, don't get married, I couldn't care less...



posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 07:05 AM
link   
WHY?? WHY are they bothering??

These two unrepentant adulterers have never understood
or respected marriage vows in the past. She's a bar-hag
and he's ... well... he is what he is
. After decades of
causing their families pain and embarrassement, not to mention
decades of them lying and adultering ... they now decide
that they do understand and respect marriage???

PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE!


I just hope like heck that she's too old to breed anymore.
THAT is such a disqusting thought. YUK!
Anyways ... whatever.



posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 12:50 PM
link   
You know, Charles and Camilla should have just married way back when. Then a lot of tragedy would have been avoided.

This whole "gotta marry a virgin" thing is stupid when you consider the double-standard--the guy can screw around all he wants.

I don't deny that the two may very well be very happy together, and compatible...but that doesn't take away from the fact that Diana was put through sheer hell.

I'm sure she wasn't exactly a goody-two-shoes herself, but still....



posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 01:33 PM
link   


"What Wedding?"



posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 01:38 PM
link   
They deserve each other- The rutweiller is finally getting hitched to the man- I know, i'm being mean, I can just see Di turning in her grave.


This is one wedding i will not watch- Good luck to the homely pair.



posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 05:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by dgtempe
The rutweiller is finally getting hitched to the man-

Camella is a bar hag. Charles used to say that he was
envious of her tampons and wanted to be one of them.
Sickos. Both of them.

(remember all that?? his phone calls got tapped or something
and he was gushing on and on to her about how he wanted
to be her tampons?
)


dh

posted on Feb, 10 2005 @ 05:31 PM
link   
Charles' best treat is with his mansevants

Didn't someone demonstrate that Camilla is really a man?



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join