It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Robert Mueller failed to disclose litigation work tied to Russian Government

page: 1
19
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:
+1 more 
posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 08:27 PM
link   
Oh this is deluxe.

Looks like that "special" prosecutor Robert Mueller (Bueller) had recent ties to wait for it...

A Russian company !!!

Yep, even CNN says so.

It was brief and it was litigation work which means he knows a lot of secret confidential stuff.

And there's a question about whether or not he "should have" disclosed this !!

Not too much conflicts of interests going on here is there?

DaaaHaHaHa



Hurry up and scramble to cover this up !!


ROBERT MUELLER FAILED TO DISCLOSE LITIGATION WORK RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT TIED COMPANY


Special Counsel Robert Mueller briefly did some legal work for a company that was part of a Middle East energy and arms project pushed by Michael Flynn, the former Trump national security adviser who Mueller is now investigating as part of the Russian meddling probe.

A spokesman for Mueller told CNN that Mueller did litigation work last year for the entity, called IronBridge, while Mueller was a partner at the WilmerHale law firm. He said the IronBridge work wasn’t listed in Mueller’s ethics disclosure form released last month by the Justice Department because it didn’t meet the threshold for which disclosure is required. Mueller’s filing listed multiple major legal clients including Facebook, Apple, Sony Pictures and the National Football League.





edit on Sep-15-2017 by xuenchen because: ringadingding




posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 08:58 PM
link   
Mueller did some legal work for company tied to Flynn


Mueller did "less than half an hour" on litigation work for the entity, IronBridge, during his time at the private law firm WilmerHale


Stop. The. Presses.


Mueller's work for the company was not included in his ethics disclosure because it did not meet the guidelines that would have necessitated disclosure

...

"The reporting requirement for public financial disclosure reports requires that you report any source that paid more than $5,000 for your personal services in any calendar year," the spokesman said. "In June 2016 while at Wilmer Hale, Mr. Mueller spent less than half an hour on an IronBridge litigation matter that was handled by another partner. That amount did not meet the reporting requirement."


Groundbreaking. Obviously Trump is innocent of all crimes.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 08:59 PM
link   
Let us know when the question of whether he should have disclosed this and whether he did or not is answered.
Til then....:ho hum...

You know trumps team is going to look for anything to discredit the man. He's scared #less about what Mueller is finding and wants him gone. I seriously doubt that he's going to find anything. Mueller is a good man.

Poor trump, thought he was elected king.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 09:00 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Hmmm ... as opposed to the Trump campaign which we already know colluded with Russian agents to affect the election?

Yeah, that's tough. I'm sure the mounds of evidence being compiled will be invalidated.

Gotta love the "law and order" crowd, yessiree.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 09:17 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Your source is a blog and this is an opinion piece. There's nothing to show any collusion it's just someone saying of if it's true for Mike Flynn THEN it must be true for Mueller.

Great article, great source foxy. Way to go

LOL.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 09:19 PM
link   
a reply to: links234

That's DELUXE. Hahaha ha.
Love it.
The End...



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 09:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

Your source is a blog and this is an opinion piece. There's nothing to show any collusion it's just someone saying of if it's true for Mike Flynn THEN it must be true for Mueller.

Great article, great source foxy. Way to go

LOL.


See the CNN "source" in the story.

It's right in the OP.




posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 09:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

Your source is a blog and this is an opinion piece. There's nothing to show any collusion it's just someone saying of if it's true for Mike Flynn THEN it must be true for Mueller.

Great article, great source foxy. Way to go

LOL.


See the CNN "source" in the story.

It's right in the OP.





Then why use the blog that has wrong info?



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 09:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

Your source is a blog and this is an opinion piece. There's nothing to show any collusion it's just someone saying of if it's true for Mike Flynn THEN it must be true for Mueller.

Great article, great source foxy. Way to go

LOL.


See the CNN "source" in the story.

It's right in the OP.





Then why use the blog that has wrong info?


All sources matter.

How else can you klobber anything?




posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 09:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

Your source is a blog and this is an opinion piece. There's nothing to show any collusion it's just someone saying of if it's true for Mike Flynn THEN it must be true for Mueller.

Great article, great source foxy. Way to go

LOL.


See the CNN "source" in the story.

It's right in the OP.





Then why use the blog that has wrong info?


All sources matter.

How else can you klobber anything?



No not all sources matter especially when the source is not being truthful.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 09:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

Whatever you say Professor.

Whatever you say.




posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 09:33 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

See the other link that says it's nothing? Did you see that? Huh? Huh? Huh?
A half an hour that even your own article said fell under the requirements for disclosure.

This man is not about to trip up on something like this. He's known the rules for decades. He didn't just fall off a turnip truck.

Trump would be wise not to underestimate Mr. Mueller.
He has a bad habit of thinking he's smarter than everyone. Big mistake.

Anyway good night Foxy.
I'm bowing out of the thread.
Stay cool.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 09:34 PM
link   



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 09:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: abago71
a reply to: xuenchen
Mueller briefly did legal work for a company involved with Flynn
Here's the CNN link.



Yes.

It's in the OP.

Thank You.




posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 09:45 PM
link   
A lawyer that only does a half hour of work for a client? Is that even enough time to get a contract drawn up and signed? Did the firm do other work for this Russian client?

I am surprised the Democrats commenting aren't a little concerned.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 10:11 PM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye

It was probably, 'Hey Bob, come look at this for a second, what do you think?'

Mueller: "Yeah, I recommend XYZ for this case, looks good."

Lawyer says, "OK, thanks Bob."

Obvious collusion and he should be fired immediately for that >30 minutes of work for the whole calendar year.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 10:18 PM
link   
a reply to: links234

Or, the law firm is hiding the time sheets and records.

It's all confidential information.

They can say whatever they want.

I smell big coverup.




posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 10:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: links234
a reply to: MotherMayEye

It was probably, 'Hey Bob, come look at this for a second, what do you think?'

Mueller: "Yeah, I recommend XYZ for this case, looks good."

Lawyer says, "OK, thanks Bob."

Obvious collusion and he should be fired immediately for that >30 minutes of work for the whole calendar year.


Well, we don't know because he hasn't explained anything about it.

We can speculate all we want, but it would be nice to know the details from Mueller...or I would think Democrats, in particular, would like to be sure there are no conflicts of interest.

But if you guys are good with it, then who am I to argue. Personally, I don't care about any of it.

***

ETA: Just don't go around bellyaching that Mueller is also a Russian puppet if nothing comes of this investigation.


edit on 9/15/2017 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 10:27 PM
link   
a reply to: links234

It's almost as bad as when Trump Jr., who has never held office, met with a "Russian lawyer" for 15 minutes and discussed absolutely nothing.

#doublestandards



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 10:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: xuenchen

Hmmm ... as opposed to the Trump campaign which we already know colluded with Russian agents to affect the election?

Yeah, that's tough. I'm sure the mounds of evidence being compiled will be invalidated.

Gotta love the "law and order" crowd, yessiree.

Dont you ever have anything to back up what you say ? Other than derogatory remarks ? And vague , inane statements in hit and run posts ?
Stand up , let us know how you derive in your "facts"
Talk is cheap , takes money to buy land..




top topics



 
19
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join