It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Autodeification.

page: 1
11
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 02:44 PM
link   
Having paid real attention and reading between the lines, I have concluded that what really winds people of my generation up is the smugness of our current elites. They’re all hubris, no perspective. Giant walking talking egos which must constantly feed, or deflate instantly with the tiniest puncture to the moral, lifestyle and credentialati bubbles they live in. They haven’t just abandoned noblesse oblige, they’ve trashed it and replaced it with its evil twin noblesse malice. Whatever tenuous organic and emotional connection the Western ruling class had to the nation which they deign to lead is now totally severed. They act more like usurpers than as sons and daughters of the land.

Our elite buttress their entitlement and vanity with the requisite empty rhetoric deployed with no other purpose than to shut down criticism of their rule. Take Paul Ryantifa. For once I’d like to hear a reporter ask Ryan et al what they mean by “that’s not who we are”? Who are we, specifically, Mz. Ryan? Explain in clear English and with no recourse to tautologies that invoke killwords like racist and white supremacy. Push these globalist traitors against the wall with their own vapid rhetoric. You don’t get to tell us who we are, we tell you who we are!.

Our Globalist rulers seem to think they are gods, dispensing wisdom and truths which are only accessible to them through divine sanction. “WE will tell you who you are, pleb!” It’s like vile Hilary saying she wouldn’t give “absolution” to those voters who didn’t bother to vote for her, as if she is some earthbound deity before whom the rabble must bow, and from whom mercy, or divine judgment, flow unchallenged. This mental vanity pins the causative factor in its infectious spread on postmodernism, or Globalist Equalism. Postmodernism has resulted in Autodeification. They think they are divine by their own hand. It’s not an illusion, it’s not rhetoric. It’s insanity, but true.

Pride cometh before the fall, and there’s no greater pride than thinking oneself arbiter of all that is holy and right and those who would oppose you as unholy and immoral deplorables. What happened, Hillary? What happened is you thought yourself a god among mere mortals, when you are nothing but a rancid psychopathic narcissistic virago of the most foul self-entitlement pedigree. And now you have jumped the precipice, and to shield you from the abject humiliation you so karmally deserve and which you have spent a lifetime imposing on your enemies through cackles of sadistic glee, your morbidly obedient Liberal left lackeys assiduously scrub one star reviews from your book’s Amazon page.

But the tenor of the times have changed, thanks in no small part to outposts of TruthLove and HateUgly that are to be found on the internet. We see through you and your ilk. The Harpy Queen has no pantsuit. We point and mock and soon, the people will see you and your priestess aristocrats for what you all are: nakedly self-serving spoiled rich brats hawking a Fake Morality for a Fake Religion called Globalism, aka the vanity project of greedy rootless deracinated wealth capturers.

Equalism/Globalism should be attacked like the start-up religion that it is. All value is derived from inequality. If we are all totally equal we are all totally unnecessary.
It really is a start-up religion. Equalism is the perfect un-truth for the Globalism to proselytise, because it presupposes equal outcomes and that any difference in outcomes is the result of discrimination by Bad Whites. The Good Whites who sit at the top of the human hierarchy cashing in on their inherited suite of cognitive traits that allows them to maximally exploit the currently operative environment governing human status wars bear the duty to enlighten the anti-Globalists and, failing that, to ostracise and silence them. An amorphous and ill-defined enemy is identified (White Males), and the elite are inoculated from the threat of precision-targeted rage of the masses. Equalism allows the elite to have their cake and eat it.




posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 02:52 PM
link   
a reply to: CulturalResilience

With true equalism there wouldn't be an elite. Globalism is unstoppable.
But you will be gone when it comes, so don't worry, angry white man.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 02:55 PM
link   
Holy batman, what a beautiful rant.

And they can continue to live in their purple reality because they so rarely come into contact with us peasants. They mingle in completely different circles behind their gated community walls. The economy they live in is far detached from the one that us mortals have to live in and abide by.

Their greatest thirst is for power and control. It is time to dethrone these robber barons.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 02:58 PM
link   
Equalism is only for the masses as far as the elite are concerned, which was the crux of my post. The elite push Equalism because it is the best way for them to hold on to their treasonous sinecures. Calling criticism anger is one of tautological deflections the elite make full use of.
a reply to: Peeple



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 03:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Peeple

What if equal-ism is a pipe dream? What if trying to accomplish that pipe dream causes more strife and decay of our once proud nation?

To have equal-ism, pride and ego must be eliminated. Do you thing that will actually lead to beneficial results?

I see the sorry state of our nation as the direct result of trying to accomplish equal-ism. It is an unattainable goal that may just be evil in itself.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 03:03 PM
link   
Equalism serves the Globalist agenda and that is all it does.
a reply to: ClovenSky



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 03:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: CulturalResilience

With true equalism there wouldn't be an elite. Globalism is unstoppable.
But you will be gone when it comes, so don't worry, angry white man.


Globalism is unstoppable?
Is that your thought or did Hillary say that (or mb it was Kissinger)?
You are echoing exactly what the OP is writing about, the "inevitable" future, what "truth" and equality are.
Seems to me listening to them and accepting their dictates is how we arrived at our current miasma.
We don't need leaders in a free society, we need good examples of how to live.
Light will always shine and the fact is people don't like the darkness.
That is why no future is inevitable, especially not the totalitarian world super-state they think we need.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 03:05 PM
link   
a reply to: CulturalResilience

Equalism refers to gender, race and social status. Who you're ranting about are people trying to build a dynasty, like Bush, Clinton, Morgan, etc. which obviously couldn't achieve that without the masses looking for a leader. That's why the only way forward is equalism, globally.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 03:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Asktheanimals

The crux lies in the nuances. Saying you want to stop globalism is just denying reality. We have to overcome nationalism, make the masses the sovereign and this planet a place where everybody has the same rights and obligations.
Obviously I am not promoting a police state as vision for global equalism.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 03:13 PM
link   
The problem with centralized power is that pinnacle draws the most ambitious self centered people to try and climb it. The result is a nest of snakes all competing wth each other for the top tier.

They don't care who they trample to get there or what destruction lies in their wake.

When we speak of equality it means equal rights, the right to life liberty and pursuit of happiness, for all.

As soon as you centralize, nationalize, federalize everything, then you make it the gubments job to take care of everyone and thats where equality of individuals ends. Now someone has to run this unequal top down system, making blanket decisions that favor the richest and most powerful, while marginalizing the lesser than, then oppressing them when they revolt.

Decentralized and Limited Gubment is long forgotten in favor of bureaucratic and overburdensome power structure.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 03:53 PM
link   
The problem with equalism is simply, who is more equal than me?

There will ALWAYS be people gaming the system in their favour. Eventually it might be AI granted, but still!



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 04:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: CulturalResilience
Equalism is only for the masses as far as the elite are concerned, which was the crux of my post. The elite push Equalism because it is the best way for them to hold on to their treasonous sinecures. Calling criticism anger is one of tautological deflections the elite make full use of.
a reply to: Peeple



I suspect it is rather that 'the little people' aren't considered to be human. That would be a definition of elitism.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 04:06 PM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

You're not wrong.


The problem with centralized power is that pinnacle draws the most ambitious self centered people to try and climb it. The result is a nest of snakes all competing wth each other for the top tier.

They don't care who they trample to get there or what destruction lies in their wake.


No, they do not. When the ambition to reach that pinnacle is totally ego driven, the ego has a bad habit of not caring who get squashed on the way up.


When we speak of equality it means equal rights, the right to life liberty and pursuit of happiness, for all.


Yep. All. Everyone. Irregardless of what our personal preferences may be. None of our business. Certainly not the govt's.


As soon as you centralize, nationalize, federalize everything, then you make it the gubments job to take care of everyone and thats where equality of individuals ends. Now someone has to run this unequal top down system, making blanket decisions that favor the richest and most powerful, while marginalizing the lesser than, then oppressing them when they revolt.


I'm detecting a trend here...are we in agreement??

That, unfortunately, means that it'll be the ones with that nasty ambition that makes them stomp on others to get there. Because the ones who actually do give half a damn aren't about to put themselves through it.


Decentralized and Limited Gubment is long forgotten in favor of bureaucratic and overburdensome power structure.


Unfortunately, again, this is never going to happen. Not without a lot of blood being shed.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 04:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: CulturalResilience

Having paid real attention and reading between the lines, I have concluded that what really winds people of my generation up is the smugness of our current elites.


I like your thinking, but am (over time) ask questions about certain remarks:

Why do you say "your generation", don't you believe this is a fairly universal feeling among the working class having nothing to do with age? By stating it in this manner you are appearing 'age elite'.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 04:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: CulturalResilience

They haven’t just abandoned noblesse oblige, they’ve trashed it and replaced it with its evil twin noblesse malice. Whatever tenuous organic and emotional connection the Western ruling class had to the nation which they deign to lead is now totally severed. They act more like usurpers than as sons and daughters of the land.



I truly like your coining of Noblese malice. But Noblesse 'oblige'/'malcie' don't apply to representative democracies, it applies only to 'constitutional' monarchies where there are quote 'nobel' unquote families in mostly figure head positions that have from birth learned of their absolute 'dependence' on their 'subjects'. That's why we have constitution monarchies - they adapted to reality from 'below' to survive.

In the US, France and other republican democracies, one's without a historical Blood Elite or that obliterated one (France, Russia, China) the concept doesn't apply to Capital Elites and never did they have no family or historical imperative nor understanding of their complete dependence on the 'masses'.

These Elite's share the entitlement with royality in their, your words, "Usurpation" of the commons, property and resources alike from We The People.


Usurpation means taking someone's power or property by force.

edit on 15-9-2017 by FyreByrd because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 05:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Joneselius
The problem with equalism is simply, who is more equal than me?

There will ALWAYS be people gaming the system in their favour. Eventually it might be AI granted, but still!


Just like there will always be people thinking they should profit from my, or others, labor while they do absolutely nothing to contribute, even to their own well-being. This is why there will be no globalism in the short term...most of us aren’t willing to assume responsibility for another dozen dependents “just because”...



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 05:01 PM
link   
a reply to: seagull


Unfortunately, again, this is never going to happen. Not without a lot of blood being shed.

Empires always wind up on the ashheap of history.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 05:03 PM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

Yes, they do, unless they adapt to the changes both within, and without.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 05:21 PM
link   
a reply to: seagull

Thats the problem wth Imperialists though, that same ambitious, never wrong, never quit mentality drives them to exceed their resources and defenses, spreading themselves to thin, absorbing too many refugees form war torn regions. Look at whats happening in the EU. We are witnessing one of the precursors to implosion.

The same thing that eventually destroyed Nazi Germany.

Too greedy, to drunk with their own power and delusions of Grandeur.



posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 06:18 PM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

Again, agreed.

That's why it's up to us to ensure, by all legal--or even illegal, should that become necessary--means at our disposal. If we, the prollys, won't do it, who will?




top topics



 
11
<<   2 >>

log in

join