It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: luthier
Shapiro is willing to debate with logic instead of propaganda
Sure.
But what exactly happened now to justify the whining? Anyone hurt, broken windows, burning cars? What am I? Where am I? Let's see what happens when BLM rolls up in the KKK headquarter to hold rallies and speeches. Will the people there react equally civilised? Maybe that's a good strawman for the collection, we already know the answer.
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Grambler
Not much more to say. Just ask some of our left leaning ats members.
Ben Shapiro is an agitator for speaking a berkeley. No reason needed, the mere fact that he dares to have a conservative opinion proves he is just an agitator.
How tolerant!
If you KNOW you're going to stir up #, yes, you are an agitator.
So, because you KNOW a campus is full of violent idiots, it's your own fault if you decide to speak there, rather than the violent idiots fault?
A fire doesn't start itself. It needs a spark.
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: Grambler
You and I know that's an entirely different thing.
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: seeker1963
So you really think there is a conservative at Berkley? I certainly doubt it.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Grambler
I don't get it. I lean liberal when it doesn't have to do with the federal government and am in no way offended by his dialogues. In fact I find it refreshing he is articulating problems coherently even I don't agree with him.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Grambler
He was great on the Joe Rogan show a while back. It was a good forum to see him not have to fight for votes on YouTube and see him just talk.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Grambler
Not much more to say. Just ask some of our left leaning ats members.
Ben Shapiro is an agitator for speaking a berkeley. No reason needed, the mere fact that he dares to have a conservative opinion proves he is just an agitator.
How tolerant!
If you KNOW you're going to stir up #, yes, you are an agitator.
So the civil rights fighters that had sit ins in white only establishments were agitators?
What is so inflammatory to the left that he says? He is an orthodox jew. Not a white supramicist.
A decade later, however, Shapiro reversed his position. In an article published on March 13, 2013, Shapiro wrote, "Some on the right have proposed population transfer from the Gaza Strip or West Bank as a solution. This is both inhumane and impractical. Moving millions of Palestinians out of areas they have known for their entire lives will certainly not pave the way to peace" and while "both right and left agree that a population separation is necessary," he proposes that Israel "has no choice but to weather [the anti-Israeli propaganda]" until a realistic solution comes to light.
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Grambler
Not much more to say. Just ask some of our left leaning ats members.
Ben Shapiro is an agitator for speaking a berkeley. No reason needed, the mere fact that he dares to have a conservative opinion proves he is just an agitator.
How tolerant!
If you KNOW you're going to stir up #, yes, you are an agitator.
So the civil rights fighters that had sit ins in white only establishments were agitators?
Yes. I didn't say agitation is wrong. You guys are considering it so. Sometimes it's needed. The goal is what matters. If it's agitation for the sake of it or to score political "points" it's not a decent goal imo.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Grambler
Pretty farAnd the unfortunate response is the alt right which ironically Shapiro is also weary of as negative identity politics.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Grambler
Not much more to say. Just ask some of our left leaning ats members.
Ben Shapiro is an agitator for speaking a berkeley. No reason needed, the mere fact that he dares to have a conservative opinion proves he is just an agitator.
How tolerant!
If you KNOW you're going to stir up #, yes, you are an agitator.
So the civil rights fighters that had sit ins in white only establishments were agitators?
Yes. I didn't say agitation is wrong. You guys are considering it so. Sometimes it's needed. The goal is what matters. If it's agitation for the sake of it or to score political "points" it's not a decent goal imo.
I would not consider the sit ins agitation. Agitation to me implies a desire to provoke a negative reaction.
I think the sit ins were about brave people showing how disgusting racism was, not about provoking a reaction.
Someone like Milo is provoking. But I think Shapiro is different, he actually wanted to discuss ideas.