It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kyle325is
Well, I can tell you firsthand that U.S. military morale is NOT at an all-time low. You probably won't believe me, but that's to be expected. As for not believing in what we are doing, that is a jaded presumption also. The prevailing attitude is more one of "lets finish our job, as to ensure that those who died before us haven't died in vain." Did you serve in the modern U.S. military? If so, when, where? For purposes of comparing morale, of course.
I for one believe that if Kim really was smart, and not completely paranoid and egocentric, he'd dismantle his political infrastructure, and submit to the South. His citizens would thank him immensely. He has no good reason to keep his country the way he does, he actively perpetuates the suffering of his own people. I don't think this is too smart in any situation.
Originally posted by malcr
You're sitting at a negotiating table on nuclear weapons and somebody at that table accuses another member of being tyrannical and evil, publically to the world. Why should it come as a suprise when the accused sticks two fingers in the air and leaves (one finger in the US). To say this not very diplomatic would be an understatement! Irrespective of whether it is true or not hence why diplomacy is a difficult art that Bush will never master.
Originally posted by DrHoracid
ALL diplomacy is stupid. Beat the enemy into submission. Total, complete surrender. They must be made to understand, pursue nukes and DIE.
Originally posted by paranoia
Originally posted by DrHoracid
ALL diplomacy is stupid. Beat the enemy into submission. Total, complete surrender. They must be made to understand, pursue nukes and DIE.
That doesn't quite work though does it? when you talk about Nukes, the last thing you want to do on either side is "beat the enemy into submission". Oh dear.
Originally posted by DrHoracid
It is the only way it works with nukes. Complete total destruction of the enemy before they can strike back. Overwhelming force. Negotiating only allows the enemy to gain strength. Kill it NOW.
Originally posted by infinite
Originally posted by DrHoracid
It is the only way it works with nukes. Complete total destruction of the enemy before they can strike back. Overwhelming force. Negotiating only allows the enemy to gain strength. Kill it NOW.
So you want World War III??
If North Korea had no nuclear arsenal, then the US would probably invade, but i doubt the US would use military action towards a state who isn't scared to use nukes.
Originally posted by DrHoracid
N Korea has nukes now. They also have a very large standing army. They need to be "stopped" before they can do anymore damage. If that means crazy Kim alone or the entire population it needs to be done and soon.
Originally posted by infinite
This is why you cannot just say "we are coming after you". North Korea needs to be planned with extreme detail because if the US has to use force, it will be nuclear weapons, if you use nukes, the first strike has to count.
Originally posted by soficrow
IMO - Bush has backed everyone against the wall. Is he so stupid he doesn't expect us all to fight back? Or is that what he wants? Which means he thinks he's got it covered at home and abroad. ...I'm thinking bioweapons now. Must be bedtime.
as posted by infinitie
If North Korea had no nuclear arsenal, then the US would probably invade, but i doubt the US would use military action towards a state who isn't scared to use nukes.