NASA lies about space exploration - uses CGI, Green Screen, Zero Gravity Planes and Stage Props

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: usos90

Just saying that space is not habitable. No oxygen, no water supply, no agriculture, VERY HIGH RISK POTENTIAL etc.

I'm impressed with the depth of your research.

Space is NOT habitable.

Star Trek etc is for the science fiction novels.

Stay on Earth and quit being greedy.

a reply to: usos90

Space is NOT habitable.

So is the ocean.
Are submarines fake too?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: usos90

Space is NOT habitable.

So is the ocean.
Are submarines fake too?

Yeah, their under water for PERIODS of time but not as long as in space.

They constantly resurface for aire.

Had a friend that did 2 years in the Navy as a cook and was in a submarine.

Got out and said never again.

OP, please explain why we shouldn't assume this is just another thread by a Youtuber posting his own vids to get a boost in ad revenue? It's the only reason I can fathom someone posting such obvious drivel.

a reply to: usos90

They constantly resurface for aire.

Not really. No.
But you know that there are supply missions to the ISS, right?

originally posted by: usos90

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: usos90

too many risks, too many liabilities, too much of a hazardous job.

By this "logic" we wouldn't have planes, trains, cars, coal mines, nuclear power plants, electricity, running water, oil, modern medicine and just about anything because of "too many risks".

Risk takers and innovators are what get things done. Not people who sit there and go "Nope! Too risky."

You're right, those are definitely dangerous jobs and not too many people can handle them.

Just saying that space is not habitable. No oxygen, no water supply, no agriculture, VERY HIGH RISK POTENTIAL etc.

At least with the careers you posted their is oxygen and businesses available to the workers/clients. Not so much in space.

Would be worse than being stranded in the mountains.

OK.

Deep sea welding, shipwreck scavengers, any job under the sea.

Just because you wouldn't take the risk because you're too scared, doesn't mean others wouldn't to progress our knowledge.

Does it really matter I mean after Obama Calvin and Hobbes have a better space program that NASA.

a reply to: usos90

A nuclear powered submarine has no need to surface for air. They have oxygen generators on board. The only limit to how long they can stay underwater is the amount of food they can carry.

a reply to: Zaphod58

Yup electrolysis. Plenty of electricity on a nuke sub and plenty of electricity on the ISS.

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: usos90

A nuclear powered submarine has no need to surface for air. They have oxygen generators on board. The only limit to how long they can stay underwater is the amount of food they can carry.

Nuke subs are obviously fake. The only proof I have is the film The Hunt for the Red October. If they can fake that, they obviously fake all or some of the other subs.

/sarc

originally posted by: audubon
That video (Titled "NASA fails") is about the most R-worded thing I have ever seen about NASA. Just dreadful nonsense. I battled some way into it (skipping over the stage presentation clips, which had such poor sound quality that I couldn't make head nor tail of them) but finally gave up the fight when that nerd with the whiny voice started claiming that GPS satellites don't exist, basing that statement on the fact that there are no photographs taken by GPS satellites. There is no arguing with that sort of stupidity. None.

Go to the 25:00 marker.

Totally obvious that the moon landing was faked.

They constantly resurface for aire.

haha. I love these factual comments that back up an argument.

a reply to: roadgravel

They still resurface for air.

Yes, they can be underwater for long periods of time but they still resurface.

You don't have as much as the same luxury in space.

a reply to: usos90

They still resurface for air.

No, they don't.

I see you've put a lot of research into nuclear subs, too.

a reply to: usos90

They still resurface for air.

They resurface for a number of reasons, but not a requirement to get air.

a reply to: usos90

Nuke boats will vent when they surface, but a big part of that is simply because they have to open hatches out to the outside. They don't have to take air on at any point. Diesel electric boats take on air, in large part for the engine, but a nuke boat doesn't.

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: usos90

A nuclear powered submarine has no need to surface for air. They have oxygen generators on board. The only limit to how long they can stay underwater is the amount of food they can carry.

Yeah, but they're getting oxygen from the water.

They still resurface for air just for the sake of sanity of the seamen as well as resupplying.

You still can't do that in space.

A nuclear powered submarine is not the same thing as being in a rocket ship in space.

You're comparing apples to oranges.

a reply to: usos90

Sorry. Landings were not faked. Kind of hard to simulate the Moon's gravity...and no, it's not CGI back then. It's called physics. Learn some of it:

originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: usos90

They still resurface for air.

They resurface for a number of reasons, but not a requirement to get air.

True, but they still resurface for other practical reasons.

You can't be underwater for the rest of your life.

Space is even more unsuitable than being underwater.

originally posted by: eriktheawful
a reply to: usos90

Sorry. Landings were not faked. Kind of hard to simulate the Moon's gravity...and no, it's not CGI back then. It's called physics. Learn some of it:

Yeah, start watching at the 25:00 marker in this video



Moon landing was obviously faked.