It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
i feel bad for the beings who have to maintain the universe.
originally posted by: Dudemo5
Well, in point of fact, the entire universe is a quantum computer simply by virtue of the fact that it can be quantized, and the state of every object can be decomposed into various collections of quantum states.
As to whether the universe is actually a computer simulation in the sense that some higher power created it to simulate something is unknown and likely beyond the purview of science, although not necessarily beyond scientific interest.
I think the whole "universe as simulation" argument is most compelling when the wave function is treated as what happens inside the black box of a remote server that is never physically coupled to our reality, as it cannot be observed without collapsing the wave function (ie forcing quantum probability distributions to manifest as a singular reality).
And it makes even more sense if the points on the wave function NOT manifested in our reality are manifested in other realities (ie many worlds).
So, in this proposed architecture, the quantum world exists on remote servers, and the classic physics we see all around us is what it looks like once it reaches the servers we exist on.
originally posted by: Wolfenz
COINCIDENCE proves we live in a Simulated Reality
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: Wolfenz
COINCIDENCE proves we live in a Simulated Reality
Coincidence proves nothing. People attribute meaning to ALL their life experiences. What a coincidence means is purely a subjective choice. You post just confirms people choose to believe exactly what they want to believe regardless of evidence to the contrary.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Wolfenz
Ignoring the evidence with regard to the wave nature of reality doesn't make it go away. If you prefer a certain dogma then just go on believing what you want. But the evidence doses not support your superstitious beliefs.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Wolfenz
Lacking the ability to speak in complete sentences is not adding to your arguments. If you think the Universe is a computer simulation what is your evidence?
I have stated the evidence present by the study of quantum mechanics and the wave nature of the fabric of reality is proof the Universe is not a computer simulation. A computer simulation has certain properties. The Universe does not have those properties.
But go ahead and prove the Universe is a computer simulation. What is your evidence? Or is everything you say just imaginary BS? I think you are a low quality thinker. You are not giving your posts anywhere near the amount of time I spend on the OP. Maybe you could spend some time learning about the limitations of physical measurements before you start mouthing off your opinions as facts.
Maybe you could spend some time learning about the limitations of physical measurements before you start mouthing off your opinions as facts.