posted on Sep, 15 2017 @ 01:51 PM
a reply to: Krazysh0t
No worries, man. I actually respect how you call out BS, even when that BS comes from people you're cool with (like me lol). I have no clue how I'd
be able to follow up on most of this stuff, though. And the people who would potentially be involved would be so powerful that I wouldn't be able to
do anything if I had the necessary evidence.
The only one that I can imagine getting "busted" would be the Saudi Prince Bandar and that's because of the info in that 28 page 9/11 document. He's
also the one who supposedly threatened Putin with a Chechen Wahhabi insurgency if he didn't go along with some anti-Iran plan a few years ago (I think
it was opposing the Obama-Iran deal). And it was one of his "rebel" groups that supposedly did the first chemical weapon attack in Syria in order to
call Obama's "red line" bluff.
Then again, he's got multiple properties in the US & was on such good terms w/Dubya that he got the nickname "Bandar Bush". And when the West needs
"boots on the ground" in our proxy wars on Muslim soil, he's sure to be involved in some capacity. I don't know Saudi domestic politics well enough to
know if they would hand over Bandar if our govt actually followed up on any of this, but I also doubt that our political powerbrokers would go after
him in the first place. Then again, maybe it's his assets that some of these 9/11 lawsuits are going after? Who knows.
As for the super lobbyist Jack Abramoff, he went to jail for a while over a completely unrelated scandal. But he's supposedly back as a lobbyist now.
And the hijacker Atta's appearance on his casino boat could've easily been an exchange of funds between Atta & some other guests without Abramoff's
knowledge. Or Atta could've just gone there coincidentally because he wanted to gamble. I wouldn't even care about him if it weren't for the fact that
Abramoff was a powerful lobbyist back then & some of his clients could've also had a hand in the conspiracy I'd outlined in my previous plan. So maybe
the appearance on the boat was to let his clients meet their high priced merc and confirm the final details?
Of course, most of my interpretations are just speculation. And like I said before, even if I could get the info I want, I doubt anything would
happen. I mean, a Democratic controlled House, Senate, and Presidency wouldn't even prosecute the torture policy writers or any Bush officials for
their roles in that or the lead up to the Iraq War. At this point, I don't even think most people in the US care about 9/11 or any extra people who
may have been involved in it.