It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: CreationBro
OK - so what is it about official story you don't like
Be specific. Provide hard verifiable evidence
Your opinion does not matter ........
The passport was recovered by NYPD Detective Yuk H. Chin from a male passerby in a business suit, about 30 years old. The passerby left before being identified, while debris was falling from WTC 2. The tower collapsed shortly thereafter. The detective then gave the passport to the FBI on 9/11. See FBI report, interview of Detective Chin, Sept. 12, 2001
.On Oct. 12, it arrived inside a second envelope at Mrs. Snyder's modest white house on Main Street here, and the instant she took it out and saw it, she says, ''chills just went over me.'' It was singed and crumpled. A chunk was ripped out, giving the bottom of the envelope she had sent the look of a jagged skyline. Mrs. Snyder's lyrical script had blurred into the scorched paper. The stamp, depicting a World War II sailor embracing a woman welcoming him home, was intact.
Along with the letter was a note: ''To whom it may concern. This was found floating around the street in downtown New York. I am sorry if you suffered any loss in this tragedy. Sincerely, a friend in New York!''
Since then, Mrs. Snyder, a customer service representative at a grocery store, has discovered that she has one of only two pieces of mail known to have been recovered from the planes that crashed into the World Trade Center.
originally posted by: ventian
a reply to: firerescue
Mind if I jump in on this one, I will make it quick.
The 9/11 commission being set up to fail, in which Dr. Husley just showed, it did. Here is the word from the horse's mouth. 9/11 commissioner admits they were set up to fail.
Footage from Pentagon being withheld from the public. (Do you really need a source)?
Passport of the hijacker found blocks away from the crash site, because jet fuel can't melt passports. www.youtube.com...
So as the question goes, what is it you like about the official story?
29 Structural and Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Demolition of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11
Obeid, S.E., ponders
it. “A localized failure in a
steel-framed building like
WTC 7 cannot cause a
catastrophic collapse like a
house of cards without a
simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building.”
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: MALBOSIA
What would be the purpose of exposing the OS as a lie at this point? Seems like an odd question to be, but one answer is very obvious and very simple: pursuit of the truth for one's own peace of mind. And that can be extended from the individual to the social level too.
But for the curious man with an open mind, the OS was exposed as a lie many years ago. The honest debate was over many years ago, when about 80% of respondents to a poll regarding the accuracy of the 911 Commission Report thought it was dishonest, set up to fail as its heads said in public, and following in the pattern of the public disbelief of the Warren Commission all those years later.
Who really believes the government anymore? No element of the official story can be proved, from airliners to destruction at WTC horribly inconsistent with the NIST report.
The report that I believe does the best job to date in taking into account all info re the condition of the building is the Weidlinger Associates' expert report that was prepared in connection with the Aegis Insurance ligitation. That report (which was one of only three engineering research projects in the world to receive an ACEC Diamond Award in 2015) was in response to the plaintiffs' expert report in the same litigation and I believe persuasively corrected several issues therewith. Notably, however, both reports AGREE on situations in which the collapse would occur due to fire; they merely disagree at a high level as to whether the proximate cause of the collapse in such scenarios is attributable to negligent design/construction
originally posted by: samkent
You only have to watch 15 seconds of that 1 hour and 22 minute video to see where they are headed.
19:30 to 19:45 says it all.
"Our study shows fire was not the cause. Now I'm not gonna tell you what did it. I'm just gonna tell you it wasn't that."
More of the same crap from Gage and his crew.