It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Univ of Alaska findings on WTC 7

page: 13
32
<< 10  11  12   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 26 2017 @ 08:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Salander


And that would be you.

You accept that Russian pyscho's explanation as truthful regarding nukes.

That alone permanently discredits you




posted on Jan, 15 2018 @ 10:17 AM
link   
Has anyone ever isolated the noise in the video before the Penthouse collapse? Between the start and 1 second of the video, you hear a boom or crash noise.





posted on Jan, 15 2018 @ 11:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Jesushere




you hear a boom or crash noise.

I hear it but it's hard to tell which direction it came from.
Things go boom all the time in fires.
There were other fires and collapses in the same block that day. So it could have been from one of those.
Or it could be a beam snapping in 7 starting the penthouse collapse.

But if you are suggesting it was CD then why don't we hear a repetition of loud booms as in normal CD?
One boom does not make a building collapse.



posted on Jan, 15 2018 @ 03:02 PM
link   
a reply to: samkent


The fires were supposedly 1000 feet above the ground.

It was clearly CD, even Dan Rather said it.



posted on Jan, 15 2018 @ 04:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Salander

Fires 1000 feet up ??

That's pretty good Gruber, considering WTC 7 was 47 story (610 feet)

Made it was a nuclear device detonating inside the building ?



posted on Sep, 12 2020 @ 02:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: audubon
a reply to: daftpink

I'll give it a go, although I'm not optimistic about changing anyone's mind here.

WTC7 was in fact very damaged, it's just that everyone was paying more attention to 1&2. Here is an NYPD photo in which you can see that a large amount of the lower floors had been knocked out. Nothing suspicious there, it was right in the 'firing line' of the collapse debris from three nearby buildings (one of which was WTC6, which no-one ever mentions, and which disappeared completely).

As for the BBC report in which it was stated that WTC7 had collapsed when it hadn't, if you can remember that day's blizzard of news, there were hijacked planes being reported everywhere (one I especially remember is four planes heading up the Potomac - never heard another word about them), casualty estimates running into tens of thousands, claims of car-bombs elsewhere in NYC, etc, etc, etc. No-one, but no-one, had a f*cking clue what was happening. In all that chaos, someone hits the "7" instead of the "6" on their keyboard, and a report that "WTC6 has collapsed" (which it had) turns into a report that WTC7 had collapsed instead.

TL;DR - WTC7 is a complete dead end, it's utter nonsense.


If it was a simple 'typo' surely they would have corrected it immediately? That's what people do with typo's right? especially on something that important? Also they had plenty of time to say it was a typo 'after' the fact.

Sorry but it seems like you're clutching straws.



new topics

top topics
 
32
<< 10  11  12   >>

log in

join