It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

N.Korea: 'Hydrogen bomb' test a success

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 06:12 AM
link   




North Korea's state-run Korean Central Television announced at 3:00 PM, local time, on Sunday that the country had conducted its 6th nuclear test. It said the test was for a hydrogen bomb that can be mounted on an intercontinental ballistic missile, and it was successful.


N.Korea: 'Hydrogen bomb' test a success

Yesterday some jets were flying over Yamaguchi Prefecture ( I live here in this area), but something weird is happening, the actual "I going to war" signs are not present between Japan and North Korea. What I mean by that is , the missile that went over Hokaido, was just about a lot of hot air. If NK shoots a missile over Okinawa, don't you think it would be shot down.

America is sitting back and taking note, when the time comes to take action, it will happen, Trump will not all North Korea to attach first, Okinawa, Guam, and Hawaii.

That is NK goal, for petes sake. Don't you guys here get it.




posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 06:21 AM
link   
a reply to: musicismagic




That is NK goal, for petes sake. Don't you guys here get it.

Yes I get it , they want the US to throw the first punch so they can justify an attack on South Korea , the US President is playing their game.

They are supplying the rope Trump is tying the noose.



posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 06:23 AM
link   
I would not put it pass China to supply them the bomb to "test".



posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 06:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: musicismagic




That is NK goal, for petes sake. Don't you guys here get it.

Yes I get it , they want the US to throw the first punch so they can justify an attack on South Korea , the US President is playing their game.

They are supplying the rope Trump is tying the noose.


If the US strikes first , there will be no response . Well , except maybe rock throwing from the North side. Which will be quickly eliminated as well...
The US reduced the 3rd most numerous and well equipped military in the world down to a rabble within hours.
Remember ?
Or is this time going to be different ?
Naw , I would say less now the US has drones.



posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 06:33 AM
link   
a reply to: musicismagic

here
or
here
or
here



posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 06:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Gothmog




The US reduced the 3rd most numerous and well equipped military in the world down to a rabble within hours.
Remember ?

No , must have missed that .



posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 06:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Gothmog

The US has a tendency of underestimation.

Not in munitions, but aftermath.

We are good at blowing shlt up, but never consider the repercussions.



posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 07:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Gothmog

The US has a tendency of underestimation.

Not in munitions, but aftermath.

We are good at blowing shlt up, but never consider the repercussions.



someone with common sense is speaking here, thank you



posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 07:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Gothmog

The US has a tendency of underestimation.

Not in munitions, but aftermath.

We are good at blowing shlt up, but never consider the repercussions.

Got any examples ?
No , I didnt think so
Done
Next.



posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 07:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Gothmog




The US reduced the 3rd most numerous and well equipped military in the world down to a rabble within hours.
Remember ?

No , must have missed that .

Yeah , I figured you didnt know.....



posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 07:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Gothmog

The US has a tendency of underestimation.

Not in munitions, but aftermath.

We are good at blowing shlt up, but never consider the repercussions.

Got any examples ?
No , I didnt think so
Done
Next.

Example 1 - Iraq
Example 2 - Afghanistan.

Next?



posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 07:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Gothmog

The US has a tendency of underestimation.

Not in munitions, but aftermath.

We are good at blowing shlt up, but never consider the repercussions.


I would say it's less about considering the repercussions and more that the press is good at manipulating the public. Anyone with half a brain knows that if you reduce a country with no history of being a peaceful and productive society to nothing, then you will need to set up shop there for decades in order to make sure the first few generations raised their are raised to your liking and not raised to be more in line with how things have always been.

The US public are like squirrels with all the attention span and stomach of the same. We lost our focus and resolve to build something out of that nothing.

If we do something similar in North Korea, then we would have to commit to it as a long-term (generational) project. If we go in and then leave, it will fall to China who will have the fortitude we lack.
edit on 3-9-2017 by ketsuko because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 07:47 AM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

War equals money, that's why it continues. EVERYONE we hate gets paid when there is war. War buys opinions, and influences masses.

The US isn't alone in this guilt.



posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 07:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Gothmog

The US has a tendency of underestimation.

Not in munitions, but aftermath.

We are good at blowing shlt up, but never consider the repercussions.

Got any examples ?
No , I didnt think so
Done
Next.

Example 1 - Iraq
Example 2 - Afghanistan.

Next?

I expected as much. Yeah , the US basically took out the bad guys.
You still weepin for em ?
Will send you some tissues



posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 08:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: musicismagic

here
or
here
or
here


Please use one of the existing threads.

Closed.




top topics



 
4

log in

join