It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That one just strikes me as completely abnormal.
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: kurthall
I can see the allowed to happen theories.
However THERE IS NO EVIDENCE the buildings at the WTC were brought down by CD.
There is no evidence the USA government was the mastermind of 9/11.
The cry the towers fell at free fall speed is a lie.
The cry the towers fell through the path of greatest resistance is a lie. The truth movement is founded on lie.
originally posted by: Flatcoat
originally posted by: neutronflux
Hey, let's starts with the lies of the truth movement.
False claims of thermite with experiments never performed in an inert atmosphere. Experiments who's results were never reproduce.
Results improperly published and peer reviewed in a pay for pay magazine
You know that's been explained many times. They didn't perform the tests in an inert atmosphere because LLNL didn't perform their tests in an inert atmosphere. They wanted to compare the results.
originally posted by: kurthall
originally posted by: neutronflux
Hey, let's starts with the lies of the truth movement.
False claims of thermite with experiments never performed in an inert atmosphere. Experiments who's results were never reproduce.
Results improperly published and peer reviewed in a pay for pay magazine
Uh, if you have read the 911 report, you would realize the U.S. Intel had known and been warning about these attacks. That was our own government.
originally posted by: kurthall
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: kurthall
I can see the allowed to happen theories.
However THERE IS NO EVIDENCE the buildings at the WTC were brought down by CD.
There is no evidence the USA government was the mastermind of 9/11.
The cry the towers fell at free fall speed is a lie.
The cry the towers fell through the path of greatest resistance is a lie. The truth movement is founded on lie.
Have you not heard all of the Firefighters, police and people who were there and in the buildings state there were explosions before the planes hit? Not just one or two but allot of people. There are quite a few Firefighters who were there who are truthers.
Bringing Closure to the 9/11 Pentagon Debate
www.911truth.org...
Conclusion
Despite the clear evidence and its analysis using the scientific method of large plane impact, a substantial portion of the 9/11 truth movement, including accepted leaders and those involved in major organizations, continues to publicly endorse, adhere to, or promulgate talks, writings and films on false Pentagon hypotheses. Some simply offer criticisms and reject or ignore evidence that would bring closure to the argument. There is clear evidence by way of disintegrating truth groups that these endorsements and communications are injurious to the movement. Public feedback shows that the false Pentagon hypotheses undermine public acceptance of other highly credible scientific findings, such as the demolitions of the Twin Towers and Building 7 (WTC7) in New York City.
Most rank and file members of the 9/11 truth movement take their cues on the Pentagon from well-known speakers, writers, and acknowledged leaders of the movement. The quickest way to end the ongoing damage to the movement’s credibility and bring closure would be for these prominent individuals to publicly repudiate their former endorsements, views, and statements on the Pentagon event and acknowledge the scientific method and its conclusion of large plane impact. In the absence of public repudiations, the damage caused by false Pentagon hypotheses is likely to continue indefinitely, even if those who fueled their spread cease to promote them. Consequently, the surest way to end the debate and enhance the credibility of the movement is for each individual to study, without bias or prejudice, the evidence for themselves.
The recent papers by scientists, engineers and others showing large plane impact at the Pentagon have been collected together on a website that invites feedback and discussion. Comments can be sent to the Scientific Method 9/11 website which specifically invites feedback on many of the papers listed below.
originally posted by: neutronflux
originally posted by: Flatcoat
originally posted by: neutronflux
Hey, let's starts with the lies of the truth movement.
False claims of thermite with experiments never performed in an inert atmosphere. Experiments who's results were never reproduce.
Results improperly published and peer reviewed in a pay for pay magazine
You know that's been explained many times. They didn't perform the tests in an inert atmosphere because LLNL didn't perform their tests in an inert atmosphere. They wanted to compare the results.
Showing "thermite" burned in dust samples collected by mail years after 9/11 in an inert atmosphere would prove the presence of thermite, Funny jones never conducted the experiment. Didn't individuals that were pushing the thermite claim they would conduct the experiments in an inert atmosphere. Where are those results published?
originally posted by: Flatcoat
originally posted by: neutronflux
originally posted by: Flatcoat
originally posted by: neutronflux
Hey, let's starts with the lies of the truth movement.
False claims of thermite with experiments never performed in an inert atmosphere. Experiments who's results were never reproduce.
Results improperly published and peer reviewed in a pay for pay magazine
You know that's been explained many times. They didn't perform the tests in an inert atmosphere because LLNL didn't perform their tests in an inert atmosphere. They wanted to compare the results.
Showing "thermite" burned in dust samples collected by mail years after 9/11 in an inert atmosphere would prove the presence of thermite, Funny jones never conducted the experiment. Didn't individuals that were pushing the thermite claim they would conduct the experiments in an inert atmosphere. Where are those results published?
You've missed the point. LLNL conducted experiments with nanothermite igniting it in a normal atmosphere. Jones replicated the experiment to compare results.
Scott Creighton's conventional (PETN/RDX) Trade Center demolition hypothesis, + Steven Jones' "Thermite Fraud".
u/mmfb16Mar 10, 2016, 11:12 PM
However, criticisms and weaknesses have been pointed out:
It hasn't shown in the "Active Thermitic Material" paper, that "super nano-thermite" is a high-explosive. Please ignore the kook "directed energy weapons" website; the article itself is fine.
The paper has poor experimental design, and does not demonstrate what it claims to.
Harrit, the paper co-author, is a novice in using scanning electron measurement methods, the main method used in the paper.
Paper was not peer reviewed, and two journal editors resigned over it.
Dr. Jones has not performed the inert atmosphere ignition test for his alleged thermite chips. A successful test published in a credible, peer-reviewed journal -- and multiple independent replications -- would give a large boost to the thermite hypothesis.
It seems likely that Jones and Harrit were analysing LaClede primer paint, or even rust.
originally posted by: Iconic
a reply to: neutronflux
If you want to ignore when I clearly tried to tell you that you were derailing my post,
Then go make your own thread about thermite.
originally posted by: Flatcoat
Sorry, but are you purposely being obtuse? I can't make it any clearer. Lawrence Livermore National Labs experimented with nanothermite. They conducted their tests in a normal atmosphere. Jones wanted to replicate their experiments to compare results with the material found in the dust. If you can't understand this then discussion is pointless.