It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO hovers over LA, helicopter starts circling it.

page: 5
142
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 12:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: alldaylong

The "object" between 2.58 and 3.02 is a zoomed in version what we see in the first part of the video, from which I posted those frames.


If that's what you think then screenshot it then and let others decide.

I say not.




posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 12:42 PM
link   
a reply to: ArMaP

I cant see the UFO move away ? Why hasn't he filmed that ?


edit on 92017fAmerica/ChicagopmSat, 02 Sep 2017 12:43:14 -050039 by nofear39 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 12:47 PM
link   
Maybe they are looking for Ramon Watkins...



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 12:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: SeaWorthy
Likely an escaped advertising balloon, probably a hazard to helicopters.
Oh, and they can be ordered in big cube form too.


If it was "escaped" then why was it static.
Can't have it both ways.

It's a good video and I have seen tethered balloons staying still because of the lack of a breeze. Someone, somewhere will come up with the likely answer.



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 01:06 PM
link   
Definitely one of the better UFO videos I've seen in a very long time. I've heard countless stories of government aircraft attempting to investigate a UFO but I've never seen it in such vivid action.



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 01:08 PM
link   
Here is my problem with these types of videos and reports: How did the object depart? Unless it is still hovering in place, there needs to be a posted video or explanation of how it departed.



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 01:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: alldaylong
If that's what you think then screenshot it then and let others decide.

I already posted some screenshots, why should I bother to post more? It's not even the topic of this thread.



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 01:16 PM
link   
a reply to: nofear39

You have to ask him.



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 01:17 PM
link   
a reply to: craig732

I agree, and I think others have mentioned that as well, in an area like that I'm sure many more people have footage of it though.



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 01:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: fromtheskydown
If it was "escaped" then why was it static.

It wasn't, it moved, as you can see on this post.



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 01:19 PM
link   
a reply to: craig732
Why comment when what ya said has already been said ? That's the problem with ats everyone has an opinion but never read other people's comments 😳


edit on 92017fAmerica/ChicagopmSat, 02 Sep 2017 13:20:14 -050039 by nofear39 because: (no reason given)

edit on 92017fAmerica/ChicagopmSat, 02 Sep 2017 13:20:40 -050039 by nofear39 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 01:30 PM
link   
a reply to: ArMaP

Well i have awaited a far while for you to post a screen shot of what you maintain in " Lens Flare " and you haven't bothered to do so.

So i will do it for you.



Lens flare my arse.



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 01:46 PM
link   
a reply to: alldaylong
That's OK, not knowing something is no shame.



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 01:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: alldaylong
That's OK, not knowing something is no shame.


Then feel no shame then.



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 01:58 PM
link   
a reply to: alldaylong

Why should I? Because I posted my opinion and you don't like it?



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 02:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: alldaylong

Why should I? Because I posted my opinion and you don't like it?


Didn't like it ?

No. I disagreed with it. There is a difference.



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 02:13 PM
link   
a reply to: alldaylong

OK, I must have misinterpreted your posts, then.

I suppose this is one of those cases of agreeing with disagreeing, then.



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 02:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: ArMaP

originally posted by: fromtheskydown
If it was "escaped" then why was it static.

It wasn't, it moved, as you can see on this post.

I don't think it moved any great distance to warrant an escaped [untethered] balloon, it was static in that area of the sky for at least seven minutes. An escaped balloon would be moving quite discernibly across the sky, depending on atmospheric conditions...plus, I think it would also be rising. The object, balloon or not, appeared to me at least, to rotate slightly. I think if this was tethered, there would have to be more than one, as just a single fixing would see a spherical balloon spinning more actively.

I'm not being obtrusive here, just thinking that we need more information and supportive sightings to provide a wider perspective of what was occurring at the time.



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 02:33 PM
link   
a reply to: fromtheskydown

If you look very close it does have the general appearance of a birthday balloon. Though it's not clear enough to tell, and I cant gauge how far out it is, but it does look rather large. The only thing stopping me from saying it is a balloon are the movements, I have never seen a balloon sit almost at the same altitude for that long, as well as not make any angle change, nor move horizontally, at least not very much.



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 02:42 PM
link   
a reply to: fromtheskydown

I think you gave the explanation.
Ball-shaped advertising balloons look just like that.



The balloon was NOT stationary, it moved, if slowly. Probably a company testing out their balloon, fixed on a car. Then they drove a bit further when they saw the helicopter and realized that their testing might be considered a problem for air traffic.
edit on 2-9-2017 by SacredLore because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
142
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join