It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

White Supremacy is a big nothing burger

page: 8
28
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 05:00 PM
link   
a reply to: eNumbra

Give him a break, Numbra. It's his phrase of the week and he's gotta get some mileage out of it.




posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 05:07 PM
link   
reply to: Wardaddy454
How right you are except you left out the part where they also donate to the Republican Party so where does that get us?



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 05:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Xianb

It isn't about supremacy anymore. It used to be. There used to be a real issue with racism in the western world, based on the use of slavery.

Can't be denied, shouldn't be denied.

Nowadays though it isn't about supremacy or racism at all.

It is about subjugation and control. The masses (I know, sounds socialist), us, the average guy, we can not be allowed to have a common thought together.

We can not hope to help each other, it is discouraged.

How many blatantly racist people have you known in your life?

I guess less than a handful in my case.

We are being played.



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 06:32 PM
link   
Nothing burger, nothing. Burger burger. Nothing. Nothing burger nothing burger.

Ommmmmmmmmmm.



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 06:46 PM
link   
I read this entire thread and carefully considered weighing in on this topic. I have, however decided to not opine and rather just wish all you folks to have a nice day.



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 06:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: enlightenedservant
a reply to: Wardaddy454

Yet on ATS, the ones constantly making apologist threads for white supremacists are always on the right wing. Funny how that works, huh?

There have literally been dozens of threads here taking up for white supremacists since the Charlottesville protests, with people even taking up for literal neo-Nazis and their "free speech" rights at "Unite the Right" rallies. Yet we should ignore that because you think they're actually donating to the DNC? (facepalm)



I didn't say anything about ignoring it. But let's break this down. So even if the speech is disgusting, you are against their right to say it? I guess I shouldn't be surprised.

Why stifle that speech? let them shout it from the mountains and let society determine if they have merit or not.



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 07:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Shamrock6

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: Xianb


So again Name a White Supremacist who poses a threat to society off the top of your heads without Google Searching them. I guarantee you that Roof will be the only coming to mind. O and before you say KKK the Dems founded them. Nazis? Copied the Lefts tactics.


I'm not a 'lefty' whatever that is, but why is McVeigh not on that list?


Because apparently prior to 2017, nobody ever talked about white supremacists. We got that gem several pages ago.


I always look at your posts especially since they always have proper order, no matter how daft the content of the thread...and I did look at other posts in general and obviously missed it in any case. Mea Culpa!
Anyway, why is this thread not in the hoax bin? or is a/politic exempted.



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 07:44 PM
link   
The O.P is simply asking you to go back to sleep, nothing to see here, don't treat W.S as the threat they are, dont name them expose them and shame them, never mind the infiltration of White Supramacist into law enforcement according to the FBI going as far back as 2006.

I say wake da fk-up !!..don't eat that rat meat burger or drink that cool aid.

More than one poster on different threads quoted Morgan Freeman,the best way to end racism is to stop talking about it,
With all due respects, that's just wishing it away instead of confronting it.
edit on 1-9-2017 by Spider879 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 08:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: Shamrock6

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: Xianb


So again Name a White Supremacist who poses a threat to society off the top of your heads without Google Searching them. I guarantee you that Roof will be the only coming to mind. O and before you say KKK the Dems founded them. Nazis? Copied the Lefts tactics.


I'm not a 'lefty' whatever that is, but why is McVeigh not on that list?


Because apparently prior to 2017, nobody ever talked about white supremacists. We got that gem several pages ago.


I always look at your posts especially since they always have proper order, no matter how daft the content of the thread...and I did look at other posts in general and obviously missed it in any case. Mea Culpa!
Anyway, why is this thread not in the hoax bin? or is a/politic exempted.


It's probably the best example I've ever read of just why white supremacism isn't a 'nothing burrger' , how absurd their views are, and how despite the way things feel a lot of the time - there are actually some clever, entertaining and sane people on here that aren't nazi appologists.

Been a while since people called out this site being so obviously used as a terror recruiting tool for young, dumb, impressionable wannabe fuhrers. If anything this should be stickied in case anyone ever needed the bleeding obvious pointing out to them that there's billions of people and thousands of political ideologies in the world, things are a bit more complex than left vs right or good vs evil.



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 08:11 PM
link   
This thread and many others just prove how easily manipulated most of the people on the right are. Their phrases and terms are always word used by TV personalities, blogs or right wing websites.

They begin to use these terms like good little sheep in their everyday interactions.



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 08:14 PM
link   
People who have used the term "nothing burger" more than 5 or 6 times have a big "nothing burger" between their ears.



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 08:29 PM
link   
San Berdino. Now I have to listen to Frank Zappa. He puts an apostrophe in his, though.

Antifa and the ctrl-left are responsible for breeding more white supremacists than the Ku Klux Klan. The more they try to push them underground and shut them up, the more white nationalists they'll produce.



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 08:43 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Except they did and more than once. And for the most part until recent history each party had a liberal, moderate and conservative faction of their own.

Here's the thing... even if you were right (which is laughable) how do these vile POS's vote these days? You're foolishly focused on party affiliation and ignoring ideology. I can call myself a Republican does that make me a Right Winger?

Who are the Ws's voting for Neo? Conservative candidates or liberal candidates? They voted for Trump.

ETA: I forgot to caveat for the Neo-PC and snowflakes...

*I do not believe that all Republicans and Conservatives are racist.




edit on 9/1/2017 by Kali74 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 08:49 PM
link   
What I don't understand is, when someone on the left says that all Muslims are not a threat, we get labeled as Muslim extremists sympathizers but when people like the OP says that all Nazi's (he/she does not state "white people") are not a threat, they are not thought of as Nazi sympathizer.

See the difference?



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 08:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Onslaught9966
What I don't understand is, when someone on the left says that all Muslims are not a threat, we get labeled as Muslim extremists sympathizers but when people like the OP says that all Nazi's (he/she does not state "white people") are not a threat, they are not thought of as Nazi sympathizer.

See the difference?





I am very concerned about anyone who finds this argument compelling.



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 09:00 PM
link   
a reply to: eNumbra




Has anyone kept a running tally on how many times Neo has uttered "Nothing burger" in this thread?


Did anyone actually bother reading the thread title?

On ATS we're suppose to discuss the topic instead of making asinine ad homenims.



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 09:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Xianb

This is legitimately may be the single dumbest thing I have ever read, and I couldn't possibly have less respect for you as a person for being ignorant enough to write it.



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 09:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Onslaught9966
This thread and many others just prove how easily manipulated most of the people on the right are. Their phrases and terms are always word used by TV personalities, blogs or right wing websites.

They begin to use these terms like good little sheep in their everyday interactions.


And the Left is so much better at being original right?



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 09:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: eNumbra




Has anyone kept a running tally on how many times Neo has uttered "Nothing burger" in this thread?


Did anyone actually bother reading the thread title?

On ATS we're suppose to discuss the topic instead of making asinine ad homenims.


Hopefully mods have more sense than to ban people for calling out nazi sympathisers like yourself and the OP. The disgusting behaviour requires adressing before they end up in jail for radicalising some terrorist sympathising/promoting wrong-un of any political flavour.

The ones by the OP, yourself and that Xuenchen guy are by far the worst examples of justifying crimes against humanity I've read on these boards.
edit on 1-9-2017 by bastion because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 09:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: eNumbra




Has anyone kept a running tally on how many times Neo has uttered "Nothing burger" in this thread?


Did anyone actually bother reading the thread title?

On ATS we're suppose to discuss the topic instead of making asinine ad homenims.


*Ahem*



Definition of ad hominem

1 : appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect an ad hominem argument

2 : marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made made an ad hominem personal attack on his rival

merriam-webster

An observation or question about the things you may have, or may not have said in this thread is categorically not an "ad-hom".

It is certainly not an attack on your character.

I think it's helpful to remind ourselves on exactly what constitutes an "ad-hom attack", to keep us from falsely trying to martyr ourselves as a victim.


edit on 1-9-2017 by Kettu because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
28
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join