It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Fossil footprints challenge established theories of human evolution Date: August 31, 2017

page: 4
43
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 07:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Blaine91555

Our high Sierra silt makes for great short term prints. In this case a hoax is out of the question, the tracks were laid down over the tracks of friends that were 10 minutes ahead of.
And I heard the ? moving, crashing actually, through the brush, down a ravine that the tracks led into from the trail, as I was coming up to the track in the trail.
It crossed the same trail several times as it moved down the mountain. There were even places where you could see it slipped and slid down the hill to the trail bed, before crossing the trail.
Where we first found the track, it stopped and shuffled around before moving down the trail, several times , just as one might do when stopping to listen.
There were 3 reported encounters, within a 5 mile radius of mine, within 2 months.




posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 07:17 PM
link   
a reply to: punkinworks10

I'm interested and open minded, but I think this is best left for another thread. If you already made a thread, please U2U me a link so we don't derail this one. I am interested.



posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 07:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Blaine91555

Well, techically since we are talking about tracks and homonid foot structure its mot really a derailment, more of a slight reroute.
Please feel free to msg me with any questions.
I may have done a thread on it years ago, i know i have commented on BF posts in that forum.



posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 07:33 PM
link   
a reply to: punkinworks10

Yes, I guess it does apply when talking about how tracks appear in real life, as opposed to the TV/movie driven idea of tracks and tracking. In any case, scat is more telling than tracks are. Of course that does not matter when talking about fossil tracks.

I found it interesting in the PDF that bears were included in those that could not be discounted out of hand.

I can't help but think that most Bigfoot tracks are from bears and a case of mistaken identity. I can only imagine how hard it must be to without any doubt identify a fossil track.



posted on Sep, 18 2017 @ 10:05 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04why should it not exist there? Evolution is screwy at its best? We are finding new fossils (a piece of the puzzle) everyday.
No one really knows when or how we can to be. But the evidence that hominids have been raining the earth is piling up and pushing dates back further. It's just a matter of time till we figure out the truth of our roots and existence.



posted on Sep, 18 2017 @ 10:38 AM
link   
a reply to: punkinworks10
The best way I found from reading articles is that when a fossil is found they take a sample from the layer it is found in or any plant material they find as well.
The dating is not exact usually within a few million years give it take.



posted on Sep, 18 2017 @ 05:18 PM
link   
PEOPLE SUCK @$$,

Sadly the site was vandalised in the last week, with four or five of the 29 tracks stolen. We are fortunate that many of the best tracks remain – the people who did it clearly didn’t know what they were looking for. Our guess is that they were simply intending to sell them.

The theft occurred despite the site being afforded protection under Greek heritage law and being in the care of local officials. Police, we are told, have made an arrest in connection with the incident, and it is hoped that the missing material will be returned soon. The damage, however, is irreparable.


www.heritagedaily.com... =facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer



new topics

top topics



 
43
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join