It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Dumbest Anti-Trump Protestors Ever PJW

page: 2
65
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:32 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Can you point out how it was biased in nature or misleading, exactly?

Don't say it's obvious because I can't see it. You have to actually point it out for me.
edit on 31-8-2017 by toysforadults because: (no reason given)




posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:33 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert




Ok. The real question is...why do so many of you fall for it?


You neglect to mention what we are falling for.

What are we falling for?



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:34 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert




It doesn't prove anything, other than there are people out there that believe what they want to believe, despite proper evidence.


Wouldn' that also apply to the "right" as you call it?

Also, doesn't that also imply that there is no right and left and that there is indeed a spectrum of beliefs?



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RazorV66



What in that video seems taken out of context to you? Because it has been edited to include the commentary by Watson?


No. Complete context requires no edit whatsoever.



The other guy asks questions and gets nonsense answers, none of those parts look cut up.......they then cut to Watson making comments about the stupidity. If I walked through a Trump protest with a camera and asked the same questions, the result would be the same.


Please do so. Give us that context.



But the majority will say "Trump bad"...you ask them why?.....they say "because Trump bad racist"


Please provide that evidence.



It's been shown time and time again to be the case....they will scream Nazi, racist, misogynist, liar etc.


It's also been shown that idiots will believe any edited bull# from Infowars and PJW.



Without any form of reasoning to back it up.


Give me a reason to beleive this propaganda...


But in what way EXACTLY was it biased and misleading, aside from you allegation that it has no context?



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: introvert

Can you point out how it was biased in nature or misleading, exactly?

Don't say it's obvious because I can't see it. You have to actually point it out for me.


It's edited.

Whether it's biased or not is up to you.

It's reasonable to expect an outlet that is willing to produce highly-edited content is trying to push propaganda.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: introvert




Ok. The real question is...why do so many of you fall for it?


You neglect to mention what we are falling for.

What are we falling for?


Propaganda.

I did not neglect to mention that.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: toysforadults

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RazorV66



What in that video seems taken out of context to you? Because it has been edited to include the commentary by Watson?


No. Complete context requires no edit whatsoever.



The other guy asks questions and gets nonsense answers, none of those parts look cut up.......they then cut to Watson making comments about the stupidity. If I walked through a Trump protest with a camera and asked the same questions, the result would be the same.


Please do so. Give us that context.



But the majority will say "Trump bad"...you ask them why?.....they say "because Trump bad racist"


Please provide that evidence.



It's been shown time and time again to be the case....they will scream Nazi, racist, misogynist, liar etc.


It's also been shown that idiots will believe any edited bull# from Infowars and PJW.



Without any form of reasoning to back it up.


Give me a reason to beleive this propaganda...


But in what way EXACTLY was it biased and misleading, aside from you allegation that it has no context?



Can't tell you exactly.

Without compete context, how would we know exactly what was said and the context in which it was said?

If they are not willing to publish the unedited footage, it is pure propaganda.
edit on 31-8-2017 by introvert because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:40 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

It being edit has no bearing on weather or not it is biased or misleading.

Thus far your assertion that it's propaganda is only a hypothesis.

Hypothesis;


a supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: toysforadults

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RazorV66



What in that video seems taken out of context to you? Because it has been edited to include the commentary by Watson?


No. Complete context requires no edit whatsoever.



The other guy asks questions and gets nonsense answers, none of those parts look cut up.......they then cut to Watson making comments about the stupidity. If I walked through a Trump protest with a camera and asked the same questions, the result would be the same.


Please do so. Give us that context.



But the majority will say "Trump bad"...you ask them why?.....they say "because Trump bad racist"


Please provide that evidence.



It's been shown time and time again to be the case....they will scream Nazi, racist, misogynist, liar etc.


It's also been shown that idiots will believe any edited bull# from Infowars and PJW.



Without any form of reasoning to back it up.


Give me a reason to beleive this propaganda...


But in what way EXACTLY was it biased and misleading, aside from you allegation that it has no context?



Can't tell you exactly.

Without compete context, how would we know exactly what was said and the context in which it was said.

If they are not willing to publish the unedited footage, it is pure propaganda.


At least you're willing to admit that you have no evidence to support your notion.

I just wanted to make that clear for everyone who was even thinking about believing you.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:46 PM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults



It being edit has no bearing on weather or not it is biased or misleading.


It also has no bearing on it being truthful.

Correct?

The edit implies they are not willing to let it stand as it is.



Thus far your assertion that it's propaganda is only a hypothesis.


Thus far any assertion that it is truth is a hypothesis.
edit on 31-8-2017 by introvert because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:47 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert




The edit implies they are not willing to let it stand as it is.


Here is the important question you need to answer before anything you say can be true..

HOW was it edit??




Thus far any assertion that is is truth is a hypothesis.


This made absolutely no sense.
edit on 31-8-2017 by toysforadults because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: stosh64
The more the country sees of surreal cluelessness like this the more Trump will win in a landslide in 2020.


See, here's the problem. The longer Trump continues to cater to his base, the greater the anger from the "anti-Trumpers". The greater the anger, the greater the desire to see him gone. If the dems (or independents!) can produce an actual viable candidate next time (I know, big if), that spells serious trouble for Trump. And as far as dumbness goes - I guarantee that the vast majority of anti-Trumpers are far from dumb. I'm sure I could cherry-pick plenty of dim bulbs on the pro-Trump side, too.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:49 PM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults



At least you're willing to admit that you have no evidence to support your notion.


I do have evidence. The video does not provide complete context.

Therefore, my "notion" is validated.



I just wanted to make that clear for everyone who was even thinking about believing you.


What purpose does that serve? Why would I care whom believes me?

My assertion still stands.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:52 PM
link   
a reply to: stosh64

Thanks for sharing. LOL..Fart noises is all they got. Owen Shroyer is a fantastic journalist. I don't care that he's from Infowars. The man knows how to get things done, even when surrounded by a lot of mental cases.




posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: introvert

It being edit has no bearing on weather or not it is biased or misleading.

Thus far your assertion that it's propaganda is only a hypothesis.

Hypothesis;


a supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation.


You answered your own question with a incorrect statement. The fact that it was edited i.e. "cherrypicked from many interviews" shows it is biased. Do you think if a video was made asking "unite the right" folks they would all come out mensa candidates?



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wookiep
a reply to: stosh64

Thanks for sharing. LOL..Fart noises is all they got. Owen Shroyer is a fantastic journalist. I don't care that he's from Infowars. The man knows how to get things done, even when surrounded by a lot of mental cases.



That is not journalism.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:55 PM
link   
Antifa failed

Back to the drawing board....




posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:56 PM
link   
a reply to: ColoradoJens




The fact that it was edited i.e. "cherrypicked from many interviews" shows it is biased.


How do you know it was cherry picked?



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:57 PM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults



Here is the important question you need to answer before anything you say can be true..

HOW was it edit??


It was not presented as is. It was edited.

That's how it's an edit.



This made absolutely no sense.


True. That's why I edited what I posted.

Perhaps you now know how important an edit can be.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 09:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: ColoradoJens




The fact that it was edited i.e. "cherrypicked from many interviews" shows it is biased.


How do you know it was cherry picked?


Seriously?



new topics

top topics



 
65
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join