It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why are the Left and RINO's not interested in our freedoms

page: 7
8
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 05:18 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

I can agree but that wasn't done or suggested by either side.

Accept maybe Rand Paul and his father.




posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 05:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: ketsuko

I can agree but that wasn't done or suggested by either side.

Accept maybe Rand Paul and his father.

Making freedom lovers like us needing to keep a stiff upper lip and continue following the truth, wherever it leads us.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 05:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: ketsuko

I can agree but that wasn't done or suggested by either side.

Accept maybe Rand Paul and his father.


Actually, it was if you looked. There were a fair few conservatives who lean more libertarian who were suggesting it. Thing is that most people mistake Republicans for conservatives and libertarians. Many of them are a different brand of a thing being more authoritarian. The best way to think of them is that they believe just as much as democrats in the power of big government; they just believe they can run it smarter.

Everyone points to Kansas as such an ultra conservative state, but the truth is that it's a perfect marriage between big government Republicans and democrats. Each side seeks to enforce their morality through government and both sides love to grow government for the power they think they'll get. That's why the tax cuts failed - no one wanted to cut government in order to balance the budget.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 05:55 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

So a few out of hundreds.

Not very compelling reason to support the party.

Edit. Just did some digging, almost impossible to find a Republican say they support getting the government out of marriage. Some say it's states rights. Which is not correct either. Since you still denying contracts.

I see Rand, Ron, and that's it. But enlighten me and send me some of these people.

I would assume Amash is one but I can't find anything regarding that debate.
edit on 31-8-2017 by luthier because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 07:51 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

Still crying about marriage equality, Ketz?

And they say Clinton supporters can't let a loss go ... sheesh.



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 02:34 AM
link   
It's how the division game is played to keep the voters interesting in sides or least of the worst for those who don't want the sides.



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 07:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Krazysh0t

One leads to the other.

No. They don't.

It is disingenuous at best to imply that they are not at all related.

No one said they aren't related.


And for there to be social justice, you must have at least one and more likely both forms but ideally the final form.

Stop making up arguments because you think they sound good. This is all one big strawman stemming from your lack of knowledge on the nuances between Democractic Socialism, Socialism, or Communism. It isn't a slippery slope where you start at point A and end up at Communism at the end. That is stupid.

By that same ridiculous reasoning I could say that conservatism leads to anarchy.
edit on 1-9-2017 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
8
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join