It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why are the Left and RINO's not interested in our freedoms

page: 5
8
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 10:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Justoneman

As evidenced by the fact that I can operate a computer keyboard, I have many brain cells, neurons, and all the connective tissues, nerves and other neural infrastructure required to indulge in a cerebral existence.

As evidenced by the fact that you have no idea how to differentiate properly between communism, socialism, and things you do not like more generally (which is an appearance you have done absolutely everything to promote in this very thread), you are probably in need of a greater degree of assistance with regard to the use of your grey matter, than I am.



A robot can do those things you do understand? A robot would have machinistical thinking like you appear to bring to the table.




posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 10:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Justoneman

Please put that stupidity where it belongs.

My position is that I love the Constitution and I despise insipid empty rhetoric like the OP and similar posts. Particularly as put forth by incompetent promoters as is evidenced herein.


I see that is only despised by you when it stings of the truth that exposes the left even as it exposes the far right also. The freedom of the people is in danger. Those of the Alt left and KKK, who are also left along with the frickin' NAZI's who are also left, have a plan and it does help the 'progressive' point of view. They thank you for not understanding it clearly. They want big government and to tell other people what to do.They want to help the NWO usher in a totalitarian state for all the earth but CANNOT do it without wiping the US out of the equation IMO.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 10:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Justoneman

A robot? No, you might be thinking of one of the many attempts at creation of a true A.I. but a robot probably could not. They have to concentrate on far too many things, like being able to remain upright, oriented correctly and being aware of the space they are in, to engage in any kind of debate, leave alone operate a significantly nuanced capacity for read and response.

And with regard to my having "machinistical" thought processes, you might have meant mechanistic, which is a word, rather than what you said which is rather emphatically NOT a word. Again, I need no help where the operation of my grey matter is concerned, but you appear to be having linguistic problems now, which is of significant concern, unless this is a common feature of your manner of communication. If it is not common to your manner of communication to use non-words in a serious setting, it might be wise to either take a break, or, in the event that you are also experiencing any auditory or visual interference, to seek medical attention, in case stroke, or something similar, proves imminent.

As for my method of thinking specifically, I have to protest. I do not think like a computer. I think like a human being damned well ought to, which is carefully, clearly, and with zero tolerance for nonsense and illogical prattle. If I appear machine like to you, it may be because you are insufficiently experienced at the art of cogitation, which is sad, but not my fault, and only your own responsibility to improve upon.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 11:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Justoneman

Well I see you are dropping all pretenses at blaming both sides now. Not that I believed your sincerity anyways.


Something neat. You get to believe whatever makes you happy. I will be the one pointing out the truth that lands wherever truth is.

Cheap cliches and slogans aren't substitutes for the truth.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 11:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Justoneman

LOL you'll have to provide some truth for anyone to be stung. All your posts are doing is squawking the garden variety right media twaddle.

Your understanding is primative.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 11:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Justoneman

A robot? No, you might be thinking of one of the many attempts at creation of a true A.I. but a robot probably could not. They have to concentrate on far too many things, like being able to remain upright, oriented correctly and being aware of the space they are in, to engage in any kind of debate, leave alone operate a significantly nuanced capacity for read and response.

And with regard to my having "machinistical" thought processes, you might have meant mechanistic, which is a word, rather than what you said which is rather emphatically NOT a word. Again, I need no help where the operation of my grey matter is concerned, but you appear to be having linguistic problems now, which is of significant concern, unless this is a common feature of your manner of communication. If it is not common to your manner of communication to use non-words in a serious setting, it might be wise to either take a break, or, in the event that you are also experiencing any auditory or visual interference, to seek medical attention, in case stroke, or something similar, proves imminent.

As for my method of thinking specifically, I have to protest. I do not think like a computer. I think like a human being damned well ought to, which is carefully, clearly, and with zero tolerance for nonsense and illogical prattle. If I appear machine like to you, it may be because you are insufficiently experienced at the art of cogitation, which is sad, but not my fault, and only your own responsibility to improve upon.


When it comes to illogical prattle I have seen you dish out a fair amount of it. I have considered your posts in the past to be spot on but recently, you have slipped into a totalitarian fan.

I am debriefing, here in this thread, the events that are creating the fall of our society. You are spouting the ol' "beat up the talkers" just like they did in Germany and the Soviet Union in the last century and blaring NAZI right winger BS all over ATS. I merely point out what seems obvious in an attempt to draw out those who have been properly duped into a discussion so the logical thinkers get all sides AND the truth for their own discernment. Many others are like me here.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 11:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Justoneman

LOL you'll have to provide some truth for anyone to be stung. All your posts are doing is squawking the garden variety right media twaddle.

Your understanding is primative.


So be it if you feel that way. I would consider your drivel at Neanderthal level but would not say that in front of polite company nor should you. There are many here who have mopped the floor with you excuse makers for the violence. I am but one who have given you a way to prove me right.

I put this in the mudpit so people could speak freely. You will see that is a personality trait and not grandstanding. I want you to say what you feel so I can understand what makes the destroyers of our society tick. Silencing you causes people to speculate and appearances affect speculation. I am sure you normally care not to comprehend from your posts on ATS.
edit on 31-8-2017 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 11:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Justoneman

LOL you'll have to provide some truth for anyone to be stung. All your posts are doing is squawking the garden variety right media twaddle.

Your understanding is primative.


I would consider your drivel at Neanderthal level but would not say that in front of polite company nor should you.

I don't want to insult you by calling you a caveman, but I will do it anyways by talking about that being my true feelings. Lol.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 11:27 AM
link   
a reply to: Justoneman

Thanks for a good laugh. I'm pretty arrogant, but you take the prize. Enjoy your self-congratulations and silly praise ... for yourself.

You probably don't get a lot of that from others, lol



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 11:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Justoneman

Thanks for a good laugh. I'm pretty arrogant, but you take the prize. Enjoy your self-congratulations and silly praise ... for yourself.

You probably don't get a lot of that from others, lol


That you are pretty arrogant is a step in the right direction. I am pretty factual.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 11:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Justoneman

Nah, your posts just bore folks into ignoring you.

/shrug



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 11:31 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Too slick for me, LoL

/grunt



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 11:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Justoneman


Heh...


Yes this is the mud pit. I CAN take it.


I guess you were wrong.

You cannot even stand to be called out when you are clearly in the wrong sir. You can take precisely nothing, as evidenced by that tired little rant above. As for your appeal to bipartisanship, that is the most two faced, double speaking crap I have heard out of any mouth bar Trumps, for some considerable time. I do not know whether to be impressed or disgusted. You have no respect for any line of reasoning, other than the one which continues to trample the actual meaning of the Constitution into the dirt, and continues to piss on the memories of those who ACTUALLY fought for freedom, as opposed to those who fought for mineral wealth and easier access to opium sources.

Do not compound your stupidity by getting into a dispute with me! Doing so would be like trying to kidney shank a bear with a safety pin, in that will not work, and you will be metaphorically ripped to bits if you try.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 11:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Justoneman

How many republicans do you think stand up for the constitution? I can count about three.

Your op is just bs. The GOP trashes the constitution as a whole not as a faction or small group.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 11:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Justoneman


We have people with hate who get to say what they want and beat others up in public who disagree that is driving us to anarchy.

Because anarchy, state sanctioned or otherwise, justifies increased control measures and more legislature that deprives everyone of their freedoms and liberties.

IOW, more police state.


Yes and we need to crack down on violence at these rally's. Put them in jail and hit them with big charges as they are disrupting the Republic in an effort to destroy what they don't like. By choosing violence, they have no logical position to go but down to the gray bar motel.

Then arrest the whole gubment apparatus, for they are behind the 'violence'.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 12:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Justoneman

How in the world did this OP go so completely off the rails? Haven't read them all but it looks to me like my comment and maybe one or two more are the only "On Topic" comments in the whole thread.

What's up with that?



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 01:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Justoneman

Because towing the antihuman antiamerican propaganda lines their parties shovel them are all they know. Its mere neuroscience, to oversimplify it, its not all their fault.




posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 02:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

One leads to the other.


so·cial·ism
ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/Submit
noun
a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
synonyms: leftism, welfarism; More
policy or practice based on the political and economic theory of socialism.
synonyms: leftism, welfarism; More
(in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of communism.



com·mu·nism
ˈkämyəˌnizəm/Submit
noun
a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs.


It is disingenuous at best to imply that they are not at all related.

And for there to be social justice, you must have at least one and more likely both forms but ideally the final form.


so·cial jus·tice
noun
justice in terms of the distribution of wealth, opportunities, and privileges within a society.
"individuality gives way to the struggle for social justice"


Of Marxist theory in order to even come close to realizing the utopia you all imagine you can impose.

And the kicker is that while they all have you chasing your utopia (no place), they gain power: power to control and power to take and give as they see fit.

Why now do you think pretty much every sociopath who seeks power is all for it?
edit on 31-8-2017 by ketsuko because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 03:50 PM
link   
Appeal to Definition



Using a dictionary’s limited definition of a term as evidence that term cannot have another meaning, expanded meaning, or even conflicting meaning. This is a fallacy because dictionaries don’t reason; they simply are a reflection of an abbreviated version of the current accepted usage of a term, as determined by argumentation and eventual acceptance.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 04:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: Justoneman

How in the world did this OP go so completely off the rails? Haven't read them all but it looks to me like my comment and maybe one or two more are the only "On Topic" comments in the whole thread.

What's up with that?


A very good question and IgnoranceIsntBliss has an answer that seems to fit. I clearly implicated members of both parties but it turns into a left wing spin session gone awry once again as it must only be the right that are guilty..... SMH


edit on 31-8-2017 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
8
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join