It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“You have not sufficiently demonstrated that the public’s interest in disclosure outweighs personal privacy interests of the subject,” FBI records management section chief David M. Hardy told Mr. Clevenger in a letter Monday.
www.politico.com...
Grassley released a letter Thursday to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in which he raised concerns about McCabe’s independence. The letter comes as conservative media outlets are increasingly targeting McCabe and other officials involved in the investigation into whether the Trump campaign coordinated with Russia in the Kremlin’s efforts to influence the presidential election. Grassley noted that the Justice Department inspector general is investigating whether McCabe should have recused himself from the Hillary Clinton email probe, since McCabe’s wife got donations from Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a Clinton ally, when she ran for a Virginia state Senate seat. Grassley also hit McCabe over a gender-discrimination complaint filed against the FBI. The senator said Flynn filed a letter of support for the FBI agent who reported the discrimination.
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: GuidedKill
Why is it so hard to find info on who this guy is. The only thing I found is that he has been in this position since 2002.
So, that means he is an entrenched bureaucrat. I think Christopher Wray, the new FBI Director, should get an earful from The American People. Dammit...we ARE interested. The absurdity of this man's response is unbelievable.
“You have not sufficiently demonstrated that the public’s interest in disclosure outweighs personal privacy interests of the subject,” FBI records management section chief David M. Hardy told Mr. Clevenger in a letter Monday.
Christopher Wray and Jeff Sessions need to hear "sufficient demonstration" from the public that there is more than sufficient interest in disclosure.
originally posted by: jhn7537
a reply to: GuidedKill
I honestly almost thought this was an "Onion" article or something.... How the hell do they say there's no public interest?? I'm laughing as I type this.. How can they really believe this? lol...
I have no idea who this person is either not that is saying much. I can however say he seems to wield quite a bit of power as the judge and jury of FOIA request....
I think his position and it's power needs to be revisited that's for sure!!!
originally posted by: GuidedKill
Hillary Clinton’s case isn’t interesting enough to the public to justify releasing the FBI’s files on her, the bureau said this week in rejecting an open-records request by a lawyer seeking to have the former secretary of state punished for perjury.
“You have not sufficiently demonstrated that the public’s interest in disclosure outweighs personal privacy interests of the subject,” FBI records management section chief David M. Hardy told Mr. Clevenger in a letter Monday.
Link
Well I'm the public and I'm interested... are you ATS?
Discuss...