It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: theantediluvian
Uh oh. Wonder if this is what will cross the line and spur some kind of action?
originally posted by: fleabit
While action should be taken, it should be taken by Japan, not the U.S. If they had fired a missile over the United States.. then sure, we could take action.
originally posted by: pompel9
originally posted by: fleabit
While action should be taken, it should be taken by Japan, not the U.S. If they had fired a missile over the United States.. then sure, we could take action.
With what? They are still demilitarised, they have been since WWII.
USA has a treaty with Japan, Japan will not arm themselves and USA will protect them.
So you are for abandoning your this treaty and your ally?
originally posted by: pompel9
originally posted by: fleabit
While action should be taken, it should be taken by Japan, not the U.S. If they had fired a missile over the United States.. then sure, we could take action.
With what? They are still demilitarised, they have been since WWII.
USA has a treaty with Japan, Japan will not arm themselves and USA will protect them.
So you are for abandoning your this treaty and your ally?
source
The changes would allow Japanese troops to fight abroad for the first time since World War Two.
The legislation has already been passed by Japan's lower house and is expected to be endorsed by the upper chamber.
Under its constitution, Japan is barred from using force to resolve conflicts except in cases of self-defence.
But a reinterpretation of the law will now allow "collective self-defence" - using force to defend allies under attack.
originally posted by: openminded2011
a reply to: theantediluvian
Kim and his country will cease to exist 10 minutes after he hits anyone with a missile. Fat boy knows this, he is just seeing what he can get away with and keeping himself in the limelight. I am really pretty sure that any time now one of his soldiers is going to park a round in his brain pan. Hungry people tend to get unruly.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
This is breaking so fast that it sounds like the missile might still be in there air. The first to announce it appears to be South Korea.
AP on Twitter:
BREAKING: South Korean news agency says North Korea has fired an unidentified missile.
5:23 PM - 28 Aug 2017
Looking for the Tweet from Japan.
EDIT:
Fox News - North Korea fires unidentified missile, reports say
North Korea fired an unidentified missile into the East Sea, South Korean media said on Monday.
South Korea's military said the missile was fired from Pyongyang and that it passed over Japan.
Published August 28, 2017
Fox News
This image made from video aired by North Korea's KRT on Saturday, Aug. 26, 2017, shows a photo of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, second right, speaks with officials during what Korean Central News Agency called a "target=striking contest" at unknown location in North Korea. (KRT via AP Video)
This image made from video aired by North Korea's KRT on Saturday, Aug. 26, 2017, shows a photo of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, second right, speaks with officials during what Korean Central News Agency called a "target=striking contest" at unknown location in North Korea. (KRT via AP Video)
North Korea fired an unidentified missile into the East Sea, South Korean media said on Monday.
South Korea's military said the missile was fired from Pyongyang and that it passed over Japan.
The move comes after North Korea fired three short-range missiles on Saturday -- all successful -- despite initial reports suggesting failure, according to the U.S. military.
Seoul's Joint Chiefs of Staff said the projectiles fired during the weekend from the North's eastern coast flew about 155 miles.
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: residentofearth
Ya, it's been a point of contention in Japanese politics for years, at least a decade that I'm aware of. The lack of a military due to the WW2 treaty has passed. Japan doesn't maintain an official standing army out of a sense of national identity. There's not actually treaties with other nations barring them from having one. It's basically this loophole that has allowed the SDF to become what it has.
I think that eventually they'll get around to building an army again, and they'll be a major military power when they do.