It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

How to NOT be a NAZI sympathizer.

page: 2
15
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 05:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
One problem might be the possibility that certain "groups" and "organizations" may be sorta funding and "helping" both sides.

It's and old "Rothschild" trick and would explain all the perfectly timed and executed MSM scripts.



Rothschild...I'm sure you know, as well as Soros and others have been funding both sides for years, as well as 2016. In the case of Trump, they smoothed his path for decades, helped him get the CIA-Mossad money laundering casinos, helped him out of the debt of those same casinos...business is business, there is no sorta.
As for media scripts being scripted, name them all, persons, people and places, then they need to comeback, especially CNN who it seems is not exactly the darling of forums, and spend much of their time calling out Trump and his chaos for yonks while others were licking Donald's nether regions until things got seriously chaotic, and their credibility sorely tested. It doesn't sound like 'perfect' scripts at all.




posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 05:24 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert




So there were more than "two sides". Only "two sides" were violent and the comments he made, and the questions he was asked, was in the context of those groups that were violent.


In the first press conference he said "many sides". In regards to the "both sides" comment (not "two sides") he was using the language of the reporter asking the question, who claimed Trump said "both sides" in his original comment, which he didn't. You would know this had you understood the context instead of having it spoon fed to you.



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 05:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
I'm NOT a Nazi ,I 'm a MONSTER or KILLER ...get it right.


NIce.

Although I prefer this.

NSFW



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 05:54 PM
link   
How to NOT be a NAZI sympathizer?

Apparently, never wear polo or button down shirts and khaki pants again. Not being white is helpful too, although not a guarantee.



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 05:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: introvert




So there were more than "two sides". Only "two sides" were violent and the comments he made, and the questions he was asked, was in the context of those groups that were violent.


In the first press conference he said "many sides". In regards to the "both sides" comment (not "two sides") he was using the language of the reporter asking the question, who claimed Trump said "both sides" in his original comment, which he didn't. You would know this had you understood the context instead of having it spoon fed to you.


Here is what he said. It appears he was the first to mention "sides". The reporter did not mention sides in their question.



Reporter: Is it the same level as neo-Nazis?

Trump: I will tell you something. I watched those very closely, much more closely than you people watched it, and you have- You had a group on one side that was bad and you had a group on the other side that was also very violent. And nobody wants to say that, but I'll say it right now. You had a group, you had a group on the other side that came charging in without a permit and they were very, very violent.


Here he talks about "sides" again:


Reporter: Mr. President, are you putting what you're calling the alt-left and white supremacists on the same moral plane?

Trump: I'm not putting anybody on a moral plane. What I'm saying is this: You had a group on one side and you had a group on the other and they came at each other with clubs and it was vicious and it was horrible and it was a horrible thing to watch, but there is another side. There was a group on this side — you can call them the left, you've just called them the left — that came violently attacking the other group, so you can say what you want but that's the way it is.


And again:


Another reporter: You said there was hatred, there was violence on both sides. Are there-

Trump: Well, I do think there's blame- Yes. I do think there's blame on both sides. You look at both sides. I think there's blame on both sides and I have no doubt about it and you don't have any doubt about it either and- and- and- and if you reported it accurately, you would say it.


And then this:


Reporter: To protest the removal of that-

Trump: [Inaudible.] You have some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group — excuse me, excuse me — I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.
www.cnbc.com...

So I stand by my statement. He boiled everything down to two sides, in the context of violence, said there were "fine people" on both sides and only after that did he try to do some damage control to further clarify.

First step to not being called a Nazi-sympathizer, don't call them fine people, or at least be wise enough to think before you speak so you don't look like an ass.



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 06:00 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert




First step to not being called a Nazi-sympathizer, don't call them fine people, or at least be wise enough to think before you speak so you don't look like an ass.


Again, what Trump said is the exact opposite of what you claimed he said. He called neo-nazis "bad people".


Reporter: Who was treated unfairly? Sir, I'm sorry I don't understand what you were saying. You were saying the press has treated white nationalists unfairly? I just don't understand what you were saying.

Trump: No. No. There were people in that rally — and I looked the night before. If you look, there were people protesting very quietly the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee. I'm sure in that group there were some bad ones. The following day it looked like they had some rough, bad people: neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them. But you had a lot of people in that group that were there to innocently protest — and very legally protest, because you know- I don't know if you know, they had a permit. The other group didn't have a permit. So, I only tell you this. There are two sides to a story. I thought what took place was a horrible moment for our country, a horrible moment. But there are two sides to the country. Does anybody have a final- does anybody- you have an infrastructure question.


It is utterly false he called them fine people. And again, you would know this had you not had not had your narrative spoon fed to you.



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 06:14 PM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope



Again, what Trump said is the exact opposite of what you claimed he said. He called neo-nazis "bad people".


That comment was made after he made the "fine people" comment.

Just like I said, damage control.

He boiled it down to being two sides, not the reporter, as you claimed, and he had to further clarify because of his absolutely stupid comment.



It is utterly false he called them fine people. And again, you would know this had you not had not had your narrative spoon fed to you.


Spoon fed what? I've quoted his comments and have refuted your claim that he was using the language of the reporter.



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 06:36 PM
link   
Problem is the perfect example of how failing to fact check has made you support the Neo-Nazi terrorist attacks planned to take over the US.

Fact numver 1) The European Nazi coaliotion are currently the biggest threat to world peace as they've declared war on Europe using total waar and conveys of nailfilled container lorries to bomb hundreds of cities in Europe until they reach their aim of creating the Fourth Reich -www.dailystar.co.uk...
www.independent.co.uk... 1.html


Fact number 2) Said alliance of Nazi terrorist are already in the US, training and teaching US people on how to do the same in America. terror-alert.com...


Instead of praising the likes of Golden Dawn and Fourth Reich Skinhead terrorists as Patriots and painting claiming AntiFA who've spent over 100 years stopping these groups from installing said reich and regained control of quite large sections of countries in Europe where the openly Neo Nazi groups had shot/stabbed everyone to capture an area to set up their Hitler Youth camp and Neo Nazi police force, do some fact checking.

It's moronic claims like these that allowed Hitler to gain power. So congratulations for being an open supporter of the destruction of the US and Europe - sound like iciting and promoting terrorism, treason etc.. to me - better call the Party Van.



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 06:40 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Every man is God's creation. No man is born evil. Every evil person is a consequence of his circumstances. In China society turns bad people into good people. In America people condemn bad people. As someone from China, I think what Americans do is not right.



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 07:00 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Actually I refuted your "two sides" statement. The only time he spoke about two sides in that presser was when it came to two sides of the story. Neither did his statement include "both sides", which appears first as it was spoken by the reporter. Though I am willing to concede that he was speaking about "both sides" and "two sides", alt-right and alt-left, even if he said "many sides" first the first time around.

But that's the side issue. The issue whether he said called neo-nazis "fine people" is utterly false. You can neither point out where he said that, nor can the media.



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 07:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: introvert




First step to not being called a Nazi-sympathizer, don't call them fine people, or at least be wise enough to think before you speak so you don't look like an ass.


Again, what Trump said is the exact opposite of what you claimed he said. He called neo-nazis "bad people".


No that was what he said in his fourth speech - he refused to condemn them after being called up and offered the chance to clarify in the first two and chose to walked out the room.



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 07:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: tannerc
a reply to: introvert

Every man is God's creation. No man is born evil. Every evil person is a consequence of his circumstances. In China society turns bad people into good people. In America people condemn bad people. As someone from China, I think what Americans do is not right.


Hi. Would you mind telling me more about China, and how you feel about China and things? Bless you.



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 07:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Wedni

In China bad people are turned into good people through the process of lao dong gai zao, transformation through labor. Bad people are given labor to do, and once people do labor, they change into good people. It works very well.

People are not inherently bad. Those who are bad are because they got nothing to do and are bored as hell.



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 07:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: introvert




First step to not being called a Nazi-sympathizer, don't call them fine people, or at least be wise enough to think before you speak so you don't look like an ass.


Again, what Trump said is the exact opposite of what you claimed he said. He called neo-nazis "bad people".


Reporter: Who was treated unfairly? Sir, I'm sorry I don't understand what you were saying. You were saying the press has treated white nationalists unfairly? I just don't understand what you were saying.

Trump: No. No. There were people in that rally — and I looked the night before. If you look, there were people protesting very quietly the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee. I'm sure in that group there were some bad ones. The following day it looked like they had some rough, bad people: neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them. But you had a lot of people in that group that were there to innocently protest — and very legally protest, because you know- I don't know if you know, they had a permit. The other group didn't have a permit. So, I only tell you this. There are two sides to a story. I thought what took place was a horrible moment for our country, a horrible moment. But there are two sides to the country. Does anybody have a final- does anybody- you have an infrastructure question.


It is utterly false he called them fine people. And again, you would know this had you not had not had your narrative spoon fed to you.


He downplayed the narrative, twisted it even...some people...bad, (said it twice) while it was the vast majority of who were the chanters, not some... If you look, there were people protesting very quietly the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee. I'm sure in that group there were some bad ones. The following day it looked like they had some rough, bad people: neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them.

The 'fine people' remarks were just throwaway generalisations at that time.
The picture of Kelly at the Trump Tower press conference really said it all for most regardless,



Why? Trump blew it, he was advised not to take any questions other than infrastructure, but he just couldn't shut up.



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 07:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: introvert

Actually I refuted your "two sides" statement. The only time he spoke about two sides in that presser was when it came to two sides of the story. Neither did his statement include "both sides", which appears first as it was spoken by the reporter. Though I am willing to concede that he was speaking about "both sides" and "two sides", alt-right and alt-left, even if he said "many sides" first the first time around.



So he did say "both sides", without having to refer to the comments of a reporter.

Ok.

Again, he said what he said in that particular context and he had to backtrack quickly.

Why can't we agree he said something incredibly stupid? I don't think he is a racist or bigot. I just think he is lacking the ability to think before he speaks and he is trying to push a specific narrative in order to spoon feed his apologists.



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 07:56 PM
link   
a reply to: tannerc

Thank you very much. God bless you.



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 08:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: havok
I don't understand why folks need to feed the idiots.


Because they're idiots themselves. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that, the minute you give them attention you're giving them exactly what they want.



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 08:55 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

"How to NOT be a NAZI sympathizer."

My wife's taxi driver this morning. lol.



Can a chinese guy be a nazi?

She asked him about it, he said it's his trademark.

Maybe it's the Hindu sign? Will that be eradicated next?




posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 09:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: introvert




First step to not being called a Nazi-sympathizer, don't call them fine people, or at least be wise enough to think before you speak so you don't look like an ass.


Again, what Trump said is the exact opposite of what you claimed he said. He called neo-nazis "bad people".


Reporter: Who was treated unfairly? Sir, I'm sorry I don't understand what you were saying. You were saying the press has treated white nationalists unfairly? I just don't understand what you were saying.

Trump: No. No. There were people in that rally — and I looked the night before. If you look, there were people protesting very quietly the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee. I'm sure in that group there were some bad ones. The following day it looked like they had some rough, bad people: neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them. But you had a lot of people in that group that were there to innocently protest — and very legally protest, because you know- I don't know if you know, they had a permit. The other group didn't have a permit. So, I only tell you this. There are two sides to a story. I thought what took place was a horrible moment for our country, a horrible moment. But there are two sides to the country. Does anybody have a final- does anybody- you have an infrastructure question.


It is utterly false he called them fine people. And again, you would know this had you not had not had your narrative spoon fed to you.



They don't care.

Trump could have called BLM, cop killing black racists and Antifa, commie terrorists and the left still would have had a problem with what he said.




posted on Aug, 29 2017 @ 05:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert


Why can't we agree he said something incredibly stupid? I don't think he is a racist or bigot. I just think he is lacking the ability to think before he speaks and he is trying to push a specific narrative in order to spoon feed his apologists.


He knew what he was saying and meant that not everyone there was a nazi or ANTIFA. But folks like you want so badly for him to screw up that you latch onto something like this and won't let it go. Sure he could have said it better, or he could have been a stuffed shirt and spoke about nothing but infrastructure, as he was told. Perhaps that is what you people want. A #ing drone telling you what you want to hear. How pathetic.

You can't wait for him to trip or stub his toe so you can make it into a national crisis. This among many things are why I have ZERO respect for you.
edit on 29-8-2017 by network dude because: bad spler




top topics



 
15
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join