It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Charlottesville Police ID and arrest more white supremacists

page: 6
15
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 27 2017 @ 06:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

LOL, yep big bad tough talker cries when confronted with the reality of his ignorant hateful actions.

K~




posted on Aug, 27 2017 @ 06:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: aethertek


I'm all for arresting criminals, but I gotta wonder.
Why hasn't this technology been used previously to identify other rioters like in Ferguson?


Weren't there hundreds arrested at ferguson?



posted on Aug, 27 2017 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Teikiatsu



1) There is no festering white supremacy in the USA.


Spare us your BS, oh & so long as the klanazi scum feel the need to march, there will be counter protestors of good decent Americans values there to march against the vile klanazi terrorists.



22 million Americans think white supremacy and neo-Nazism are acceptable




A recent Washington Post/ABC News poll asked people about Charlottesville and Donald Trump’s response to Charlottesville.

Question 7 asked: Do you yourself think it’s acceptable or unacceptable to hold neo-Nazi or white supremacist views? Do you feel that way strongly, or somewhat?

A full 9 percent said acceptable, with somewhere between 3-4 percent saying strongly acceptable.

That 9 percent of the current voting age population (VAP) in the United States is nearly 22 million people (242.8 million x 9 percent = 21.85 million).

This isn’t some small fringe. This is the Republican base. These are the folks who Trump claims will stick with him even if he shoots someone on Fifth Avenue.

www.dailykos.com...

K~



posted on Aug, 27 2017 @ 07:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: aethertek

The tech isn't the point.
We have video of people breaking the law and nothing happens.
Why has law enforcement not used the existing tech to catch rioters?
Facebook has a few times but that's hardly taking advantage of all resources.


People were arrested during/after the Ferguson riots after being captured on television breaking the law.



posted on Aug, 27 2017 @ 07:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: aethertek
a reply to: Teikiatsu



1) There is no festering white supremacy in the USA.


Spare us your BS, oh & so long as the klanazi scum feel the need to march, there will be counter protestors of good decent Americans values there to march against the vile klanazi terrorists.



22 million Americans think white supremacy and neo-Nazism are acceptable




A recent Washington Post/ABC News poll asked people about Charlottesville and Donald Trump’s response to Charlottesville.

Question 7 asked: Do you yourself think it’s acceptable or unacceptable to hold neo-Nazi or white supremacist views? Do you feel that way strongly, or somewhat?

A full 9 percent said acceptable, with somewhere between 3-4 percent saying strongly acceptable.

That 9 percent of the current voting age population (VAP) in the United States is nearly 22 million people (242.8 million x 9 percent = 21.85 million).

This isn’t some small fringe. This is the Republican base. These are the folks who Trump claims will stick with him even if he shoots someone on Fifth Avenue.

www.dailykos.com...

K~


Jesus. That's terrifying.



posted on Aug, 27 2017 @ 07:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: aethertek
a reply to: Teikiatsu



1) There is no festering white supremacy in the USA.


Spare us your BS, oh & so long as the klanazi scum feel the need to march, there will be counter protestors of good decent Americans values there to march against the vile klanazi terrorists.



22 million Americans think white supremacy and neo-Nazism are acceptable




A recent Washington Post/ABC News poll asked people about Charlottesville and Donald Trump’s response to Charlottesville.

Question 7 asked: Do you yourself think it’s acceptable or unacceptable to hold neo-Nazi or white supremacist views? Do you feel that way strongly, or somewhat?

A full 9 percent said acceptable, with somewhere between 3-4 percent saying strongly acceptable.

That 9 percent of the current voting age population (VAP) in the United States is nearly 22 million people (242.8 million x 9 percent = 21.85 million).

This isn’t some small fringe. This is the Republican base. These are the folks who Trump claims will stick with him even if he shoots someone on Fifth Avenue.

www.dailykos.com...

K~


So the dailykos is your source of analysis. Did you see the next question that showed 78% of the people polled were non-Republican? Hardly a GOP base.

Did you also see where it asked if those people questioned "think it’s acceptable or unacceptable to hold neo-Nazi or white supremacist views? Do you feel that way strongly, or somewhat?" That doesn't mean that the person is a neo-Nazi or white supremacist. It means they don't restrict freedom of individual thought, even if those thoughts are vile.

But like most progressive lemmings, some people will believe what they want.



posted on Aug, 27 2017 @ 07:12 PM
link   
a reply to: scraedtosleep

Of course the city officials let it happen on purpose and hoped for the worst.

In leaked emails, the city manager said to "let it play out".



posted on Aug, 27 2017 @ 07:16 PM
link   
a reply to: aethertek

Wow a whole 1,014 people polled. 33% Democrat 42% Independent 22% Republican 1% Other 2% No Opinion

And yet this is supposed to show how Trumps base (and America) is full of white supremacist. You "progressives" really need to get a grip.

Link to poll



posted on Aug, 27 2017 @ 07:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: aethertek



Charlottesville Police ID and arrest more white supremacists — raise number of injured in car attack to 35




Police arrested 52-year-old Richard Wilson Preston — a high-ranking member of the Ku Klux Klan — for discharging a weapon within 1,000 feet of a school.
,,,,,
Daniel Patrick Borden, 18, is in custody in Cincinnati, OH on charges of malicious wounding, most likely in conjunction with the attack on 20-year-old Deandre Harris.
Harris, a black man, was viciously attacked by a group of white men brandishing metal rods.
,,,,,,
A second man, 33-year-old Alex Michael Ramos — most recently a resident of Mariette, GA — is wanted in conjunction with the same attack.

www.rawstory.com...


Good! A few of the cowards who ganged up on one guy 5 to 1 with metal pipes are in the pokey.

The charges for the sick freak with the car (James Alex Fields) are going to bury him in time.
Though in his case execution should be the punishment, well maybe they can get him on the murder rap.

Wow, just look at those pics at the link, why do all the racist morans(sic)TM. look like such genetic losers?

K~



For someone peaceful and tolerant, you sure hide your violence and bigotry well. It's amazing how the left jumps at the chance of executions and resorts to statements like "genetic losers" when they are allowed to speak freely.

Sad thing you aren't much different than a Nazi, the targets are just different, but the attitude is plain to see.



posted on Aug, 27 2017 @ 08:34 PM
link   
a reply to: pavil


when they are allowed to speak freely.



But "Muh Freeze Peach"



posted on Aug, 27 2017 @ 09:57 PM
link   
I keep hearing they didn't cause trouble, were peaceful, were defending themselves. However, were arrested. Must be a FF to take away guns, freedom of protesting and freedom of speech!
edit on 27-8-2017 by dreamingawake because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 27 2017 @ 10:03 PM
link   
a reply to: LockNLoad

Maglite vs what he was beat with. Soo scurry!



posted on Aug, 27 2017 @ 11:29 PM
link   
a reply to: dreamingawake

If he would have stuck to just running his mouth (freedom of speech) he probably wouldn't have had his a$$ beaten, but he decided to escalate his actions with an act of violence. Again... Stupid games, stupid prizes.

And here is what a Maglite can do:



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 06:22 AM
link   
So an update,,,the Maryland klan leader Richard Wilson Preston was arrested Saturday.

www.baltimoresun.com...

So how is it that he can pop a cap in the middle of a crowd & only be charged with discharge of a weapon?

That's reckless endangerment at least & during a verbal confrontation?, should be a charge of intent there as well.

That is the "cracker code" in action, white kkk scum fires a weapon into a crowd of people, gets a minor nuisance charge.
Had that been a black man, pfft cops would have executed him on the spot, & you wonder why people been marching.

See that's the difference right there between the sides.

Folks like BLM & those that support them just want minorities, of whatever rainbow you want to label them with, to be treated equally without prejudice.

Where the klanazis are only marching because they feel the minorities are getting too uppity & why wont they just learn their place,
"It has always been whites first, everybody else after,,, heritage, history blah blah".

Don't bother "anti fa antifa" I don't want to hear it.
Don't care about them, as far as I can tell they're just anarchists flying a different flag.
Like the libertarians they got no better plan than to blow it all up.
FEmA

K~







edit on 28-8-2017 by aethertek because: space

edit on 28-8-2017 by aethertek because: kantspel



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 09:22 AM
link   
a reply to: aethertek

He was charged with discharging a firearm within 1,000 feet of a school, probably because it appears he was shooting at the guy with a flame weapon, and prosecutors want to try to avoid him getting off on a "defense of others" defense.

Found some information on Virginias self defense laws:

Finally we get to defending a third person, whether or not this person is a family member. You first need to understand all of the ramifications above. In Virginia, whether the person you defended is a daughter or a stranger, that person had a right to life and you had the right to defend his or her life. (This doesn’t hold true for all states – many states only allow defense of a third person when that person is a family member.) Legally, the right to defend another is “commensurate with self-defense” – you are put into the third person’s shoes and are judged from their perspective – did the person who you defended have a right to use force of that magnitude against the assailant? Additionally, the third person cannot have appeared to have been at fault for the conflict from your perspective in order for you to invoke this defense. “One may avail himself or herself of the defense only where he or she reasonably believes, based on the attendant circumstances, that the person defended is without fault in provoking the fray.” Foster v. Commonwealth, 13 Va. App. 380, 412 S.E.2d 198 (1991).


Cite



posted on Aug, 28 2017 @ 09:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: LockNLoad
a reply to: aethertek

He was charged with discharging a firearm within 1,000 feet of a school, probably because it appears he was shooting at the guy with a flame weapon, and prosecutors want to try to avoid him getting off on a "defense of others" defense.

Found some information on Virginias self defense laws:

Finally we get to defending a third person, whether or not this person is a family member. You first need to understand all of the ramifications above. In Virginia, whether the person you defended is a daughter or a stranger, that person had a right to life and you had the right to defend his or her life. (This doesn’t hold true for all states – many states only allow defense of a third person when that person is a family member.) Legally, the right to defend another is “commensurate with self-defense” – you are put into the third person’s shoes and are judged from their perspective – did the person who you defended have a right to use force of that magnitude against the assailant? Additionally, the third person cannot have appeared to have been at fault for the conflict from your perspective in order for you to invoke this defense. “One may avail himself or herself of the defense only where he or she reasonably believes, based on the attendant circumstances, that the person defended is without fault in provoking the fray.” Foster v. Commonwealth, 13 Va. App. 380, 412 S.E.2d 198 (1991).


Cite



Lol, you don't go to place of conflict willingly for self defence. The same goes for the people on the anti side who came with weapons for "self defence"


Most legal systems would not call this self defence. But your right the charge will make it easier it also may have a stiff penalty.
edit on 28-8-2017 by luthier because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 29 2017 @ 10:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: SuperJosephed
Yup a few cowards ganged up 5 to 1 on this guy. This is the moment that caused the parking garage attack and surprise; Deandre Harris is shown casting the first blow. But, yeah, Deandre Harris was viciously attacked.

i.magaimg.net...


Do you have a link to this in video form?



posted on Aug, 29 2017 @ 11:34 AM
link   
Good another one down.




Authorities arrested another suspect in the beating of a black man during this month’s violent white supremacist march in Virginia. Alex Michael Ramos turned himself in Monday to sheriff’s deputies in Monroe County, Georgia, on malicious wounding charges, reported WXIA-TV.

www.rawstory.com...

From the looks of him another poor example of genetic mutation.

K~



posted on Aug, 29 2017 @ 12:04 PM
link   
a reply to: aethertek

LOL

They keep getting the guys with the "3 names".

Very effective reporting.

Stigmas and Stereotypes are today's "theme"




posted on Aug, 29 2017 @ 12:18 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Clearly a Deep state Soros conspiracy to rid the world of Three Namers



new topics

top topics



 
15
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join