It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

South Florida Judge Dismisses DNC Fraud Lawsuit Against Debbie Wasserman Schultz

page: 2
10
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 26 2017 @ 09:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Christosterone

yeah that too !!

and another irony is the fact that Nazis and Fascists in the 20th Century killed 20 or 30 million White People

but they're all "White Supremacists"

Confusing





posted on Aug, 26 2017 @ 09:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Sure he absolutely insisted on protecting private property.

As long as the "Owners" fit the "Profile".




posted on Aug, 26 2017 @ 09:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Right!

Hitler was that 'other' kind of socialist!

Everyone please kindly ignore that Nazi's.

Were the NATIONALIST SOCIALISTS WORKERS PARTY.



But we National Socialists wish precisely to attract all socialists, even the Communists; we wish to win them over from their international camp to the national one.


en.wikiquote.org...



posted on Aug, 26 2017 @ 09:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Christosterone




Why does my yard have better landscaping than some of my neighbors and not as good as others??


your neighbours dogs use it as a toilet so is well fertilized.

as for the rest of what you stated, lol.



But to expect a leftist to be educated is a dream...socialism is the refuge of the mentally feeble..


bless



posted on Aug, 26 2017 @ 09:53 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

a reply to: xuenchen

You guys obviously understand the inner workings of Mr. Hitler's mind and his motivations far better than I do ... I just know what I read.

You know ... the facts.

And what I read is that when he said socialism he meant hyper-nationalism, the Cult of the Volk, I understand that he hated Marxism and Leninism/Stalinism (even though he admired Stalin's authoritarianism, you know, kinda like Mr. Trump admiring Putin) and that he nationalized corporations ... which took them far away from being owned by the People (which would be an element, you know, of ACTUAL SOCIALISM.)

But, as usual, I defer to the "experts" on Nazism and Hitler; I only know the facts.
edit on 26-8-2017 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Aug, 26 2017 @ 09:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

We dont ?




You guys obviously understand the inner workings of Mr. Hitler's mind and his motivations far better than I do ... I just know what I read.


LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL.

Apparently someone didn't read this.



You will never learn what I am thinking. And those who boast most loudly that they know my thought, to such people I lie even more.


en.wikiquote.org...

Neo shoots.

Neo scores.

The crowd goes 'white supremacist'.

NEIN.,

NEIN.

NEIN.

NEIN!



posted on Aug, 26 2017 @ 10:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Gryphon66

We dont ?




You guys obviously understand the inner workings of Mr. Hitler's mind and his motivations far better than I do ... I just know what I read.


LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL.

Apparently someone didn't read this.



You will never learn what I am thinking. And those who boast most loudly that they know my thought, to such people I lie even more.


en.wikiquote.org...

Neo shoots.

Neo scores.

The crowd goes 'white supremacist'.

NEIN.,

NEIN.

NEIN.

NEIN!




Heheh. But you just said he was a Socialist ... and now you're saying that he was lying.

As I said, I guess you understand his internal workings better than I do.

Also ... in your little self-congratulatory bit there ... let me congratulate you on your honesty and self-awareness.

At least you realize which team you're on!



Neo shoots.

Neo scores.

The crowd goes 'white supremacist'.





posted on Aug, 26 2017 @ 10:24 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Yeah he was nuts alright.

So crazy and "Supremacist" that he got angry and killed 20 or 30 million Whites.




posted on Aug, 26 2017 @ 10:25 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

And nazi haters have murdered millions of definitions to suit their own agenda.



posted on Aug, 26 2017 @ 10:25 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

[loudantifarally]
NEIN!

NEIN!

NEIN!

NEIN!
[/loudantifarally]




posted on Aug, 26 2017 @ 10:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Gryphon66

Yeah he was nuts alright.

So crazy and "Supremacist" that he got angry and killed 20 or 30 million Whites.



You can't "make an autocratic omelet without busting a few million heads," amirite?

Again, you guys are the ones who so deeply understand Nazi motivations and distinctions... not me.

You think of Jews, Slavs, Spaniards, and so forth as White ... Mr. Hitler and his buddies didn't seem to make the same distinctions.
edit on 26-8-2017 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Aug, 26 2017 @ 10:49 AM
link   
This is one reason amongst several that I don't feel fully compelled to support the mainstream liberal "Resistance" to Trump.
The leaked emails showed Podesta trying purposefully to set up "pied piper candidates" on the other side, including Trump. It was pretty clear to me during the election cycle that the media totally shilled for Clinton and subtly put down Sanders. We were accused of being sexist and "bernie bros," at times even racist for not supporting Clinton, somehow.. The leaks showed that Sanders was sidelined by the DNC, when he had a strong chance of winning. Finally, the DNC and media propped up a horrific, corrupt, deep state politician: Clinton. The Democrats and media hold just as much to blame for the election loss and rise of Trump as anyone.

The DNC does need to be held accountable for trying to stack the primaries in favor of Clinton. We've been told for years that these primaries are fair and open. It appears that was a lie.

a reply to: Sublimecraft



posted on Aug, 26 2017 @ 10:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

The DNC does need to be held accountable for trying to stack the primaries in favor of Clinton. We've been told for years that these primaries are fair and open. It appears that was a lie.



Again, party primary elections in the US are managed by the respective State governments. Care to prove this contention?



posted on Aug, 26 2017 @ 11:07 AM
link   
The murder of a definition.



Definition of white supremacist : a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races


www.merriam-webster.com...

Neither white or black are RACE's.

They are colors.



posted on Aug, 26 2017 @ 11:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

The DNC does need to be held accountable for trying to stack the primaries in favor of Clinton. We've been told for years that these primaries are fair and open. It appears that was a lie.



Again, party primary elections in the US are managed by the respective State governments. Care to prove this contention?


You are being obtuse, quite clearly.

I'm not saying the DNC controlled the state processes. They accomplished the swaying of the primaries through complicit media partners, actually referred to in the leaks, and by also conspiring to discredit Sanders. It's all in the leaks.

Regardless, the DNC Charter states they have to be impartial during the primaries. The leaks show definitively they were not.

observer.com...

"The release provides further evidence the DNC broke its own charter violations by favoring Clinton as the Democratic presidential nominee, long before any votes were cast."

Whether or not they can be held to account legally, voters have to know, and the Democratic Party should be held accountable by the voters, especially us liberals. It's not congruent with fair and open elections.



posted on Aug, 26 2017 @ 11:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14

You can't back up your wild claim and I'm being "obtuse"?

LOL ... way to take responsibility for your own words.

Here's what you said again:


originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14

The DNC does need to be held accountable for trying to stack the primaries in favor of Clinton. We've been told for years that these primaries are fair and open. It appears that was a lie.



You suggested that the primaries weren't fair and open. That could only happen if the State election processes were corrupted. Now you want to say that's not what you were saying, and cry about media collaboration.

DWS wasn't completely impartial, and she resigned as did the folks who worked with her. Why do you think she did that? She was directed to by Democratic Party Leaders.

You seem to be confused that one or two individuals are an entire party.

Sanders got what he needed from the Democrats (national exposure), and went back to being an Independent. So you may want to ask yourself ... who betrayed who?

So, it's basically your opinion that the primaries were unfair to Sanders, but you have no proof aside from your belief that the primaries were unfair.

Gotcha, thanks!
edit on 26-8-2017 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Aug, 26 2017 @ 11:56 AM
link   
By "stacked" i didn't mean controlling state primaries. You are using semantics to try to manipulate this discussion away from the crux of the matter. Won't work with me, I assure you.

And it wasn't just DWS, by any means. The leaked emails definitely show a whole list of actors, from Podesta to media personalities. This was a concerted effort.

Then, DWS, even after this "soft" corruption in violating the DNC charter, was IMMEDIATELY offered a position by HRC. At best that was extremely unwise and poor form. In reality, it's more evidence of the Establishment protecting its own, and her not being punished but rewarded for loyalty.

I'm a liberal, but I know that the Democratic elite with few exceptions and DNC are corrupt. I can't support it anymore.

a reply to: Gryphon66



posted on Aug, 26 2017 @ 12:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14

The word "stacking" in the context you used it in commonly means "to alter, change or cheat" ... it generally derives from "stacking the deck."

I'm not a mind-reader ... so you'll pardon me if I'm not aware of all your personal usages for words, speaking of semantics.

It's funny, you guys remember details the way you want to. There were one or two comments in the emails about Sanders and the press. Aside from that ... did any votes get flipped? Was there massive voter fraud in the Primaries that you have proof of?

I'm a moderate with more than a bit of classic liberalism and a smidgeon of anarchy; I don't trust ANYONE in politics - they are all psychopathic liars.




top topics



 
10
<< 1   >>

log in

join