It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Arpaio is Free

page: 21
53
<< 18  19  20    22 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 04:16 PM
link   
a reply to: DanteGaland

NAW we just want the FEDERAL STATUTES OBEYED for immigration control as they are SUPPOSED to be by support from local officers by legal definition as a state of the union,not the world according to an identity political, activist who is in place as a judge right now.




posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 04:19 PM
link   
a reply to: cavtrooper7

Ideally, judges should uphold the law and the constitution. Sadly, many judges are political activists. That's why we have the SCOTUS to override them.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 04:23 PM
link   
a reply to: cavtrooper7

The MCSO admitted in the appeal to Ortega Melendres v. Arpaio that they had engaged in unconstitutional racial profiling. Their issue is they thought it was just their saturation patrols. The judge on the other hand said it was everything they were doing.

If the MCSO is willing to admit guilt then how is it an activist judge?

It's just like Arpaio's contempt conviction. He actually pleaded guilty to civil contempt. What he went to court over were the charges of criminal contempt. There is no activist judge to be seen. Just those willing to admit wrongdoing for lesser charges hoping that it will absolve them of the greater charges.

Either way, the MCSO never complied with the ruling of the Ortega Melendres v. Arpaio case. A case where they admitted wrongdoing. And that's why Arpaio was charged with contempt.

But feel free to keep harping on about activist judges when the guilty parties admitted as much.



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 04:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: windword
157 dead inmates listed in Sheriff Joes jail, but nobody knows the real head count. At least $140 million paid out to victim's family by tax payers.



That sucks but if they took the money, then everything is on the level, no?



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 04:34 PM
link   
Root Boy Slim - "Rich White Republican"

www.youtube.com...



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 04:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

So federal rules of law enforcement and immigration are now optional?
Sanctuary cities are illegal only.
ONE case won't change that now will it?



posted on Aug, 31 2017 @ 05:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Butterfinger


The victims and their families sued for the money, why wouldn't they take it?



posted on Sep, 1 2017 @ 07:53 AM
link   
a reply to: windword

Its sort of like a pay off, take it no problem but its supposed to clear the slate.

Take the money; you were paid off, you cant revisit the issue asking for more.

or

Dont take the money, go to court for a larger sum.

The end to both scenarios is that the debt is settled.



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 10:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: tannerc
a reply to: cavtrooper7

Ideally, judges should uphold the law and the constitution. Sadly, many judges are political activists. That's why we have the SCOTUS to override them.


Are you suggesting that those on SCOTUS are not political activists?



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 05:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes


Law enforcement employing racial profiling is illegal. Law enforcement following, stopping and detaining people because of the color of their skin is illegal, Holding an individual indefinitely for suspicion of being an illegal alien is illegal.


Such laws are BS, though. If police are seeking a suspect, race MUST be a factor in locating them, if the race of the suspect is known. You don't arrest Chinese guys if seeking some blonde dude, for example. Claiming it's somehow "racist" to factor in race, as applicable, is just foolish. If soeone is arrested, and can't even identify themselves, that's a problem.



Sheriff Joe's case went through the court system and his tactics were ruled to be unconstitutional and criminal. He was ordered to stop his illegal practices. He refused and was legally charged and convicted with criminal contempt by a Republican appointed judge.


No, a judge told him not to follow the law, in arresting illegals, and the charges were BS.



Sheriff Joe is as guilty as the criminals that he held in his jails. He'll be remembered and go down in history as no less than a murderous racist, regardless of Trump's pardon.


No, he's not guilty at all. Plenty of people respect this man, and all the hard work he did in office, and that won't be forgotten.



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 05:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: links234
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Something like 70% of the people in the county jails were awaiting trials. They weren't criminals.


Awaiting a trial does not mean one isn't a criminal. If someone is arrested for a crime, and can't make bail, or is a flight risk, it's both legal and acceptable to hold them in jail till a trial.



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 05:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Constitutionalists should be very concerned as this is a direct usurpation of powers by the Executive against the Judicial.



When some in the judicial branch stop overstepping their bounds, and trying to make laws, then come complain.



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 05:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: tannerc


Your world is getting smaller and smaller labeling everyone a liberal.



You mean like so many are labeling everyone not on the Left as a Nazi?



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 06:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: roguetechie

So you get to pick what laws are just and which aren't.

There's a term for that: anarchy.


No. that's what the judge was trying to do, who ordered hi not to follow the law, and arrest criminals.

See how that works?



posted on Sep, 2 2017 @ 07:07 PM
link   
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes



No, he's not guilty at all.


.......Said every inmate, ever! "I didn't do nuffin wrong!"

The Judicial system disagrees with you!



posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 07:16 AM
link   
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

But the "Right" are suppose to be better people.

I guess Jesus gives the Right a pass on do unto others as you would have done to you......



posted on Sep, 3 2017 @ 07:29 AM
link   
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

Police need probable cause to detain a person. If you match a suspect's description that is probable cause. Being brown however is not probable cause. Even if every illegal immigrant in Maricopa County is Hispanic they're still far outnumbered by the legal Hispanics.

Also, all the judge said is for the MCSO to fix their practices to comply with the law and that a monitor would be appointed. It was the DHS, the agency responsible for immigration enforcement, that told them to cease enforcing immigration laws. That came after the DOJ investigated what was going on in Maricopa County. An investigation that was well within their power.

At the end of the day the only people that overstepped their bounds were Arpaio and his deputies. And those parties have admitted as such. The MCSO admitted they were employing unconstitutional tactics in Ortega Melendres v. Arpaio. While Arpaio plead guilty to contempt during the civil trial on the matter.



posted on Sep, 6 2017 @ 04:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes



No, he's not guilty at all.


.......Said every inmate, ever! "I didn't do nuffin wrong!"

The Judicial system disagrees with you!


No, the "judicial system" doesn't; a couple of activist judges, telling someone to not follow the law, are not representative of the entire judicial system.

BTW, he's still free, and clear.

I didn't hear you complaining when O released drug dealers, and other scum.



posted on Sep, 6 2017 @ 04:42 PM
link   
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes


Everyone that Obama pardoned admitted their guilt and served time. Arpaio is guilty, that's why he needed a pardon. However, no pardon will wash the criminal stink off that POS, Arpaio.



posted on Sep, 6 2017 @ 04:44 PM
link   
a reply to: windword

Now watch him beat John McCain in a Senate race in AZ...




top topics



 
53
<< 18  19  20    22 >>

log in

join