It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

White Supremacists are not Nazis.

page: 20
23
<< 17  18  19    21  22 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 03:49 PM
link   
a reply to: TheTory

And even form clubs with other people that hate the same people.

And talk together about how they hate them.

And stand around in a park talking about how they hate them.




posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 03:49 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

So ... we'll put you down as Nazi-okay-with-me then.




posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 03:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Dudemo5

That is what it says in that GD piece of paper.

For the life of my I wonder why so many mini GW's have been running around.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 03:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Shamrock6

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Gryphon66




You can't make this stuff up.


From this vantage.

Nazi haters are making a hell of a lot of snip up.


Something wrong with hating Nazis then in your book?

How would you describe yourself then? Nazi-liker? Nazi-appreciator?


Ever hear of the Constitution Comrade?



Can you point us to where in the Constitution it says you can't hate Nazis?


You can hate anyone you want.

It's when you hate them so much you defend becoming violent towards them when it becomes a problem.
Christ, I thought someone who claimed to be a LEO would GET IT?
edit on 25-8-2017 by seeker1963 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 03:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Dudemo5

That is what it says in that GD piece of paper.

For the life of my I wonder why so many mini GW's have been running around.


Good to know how you really feel about the Constitution.

(PS, GW Bush never said that ... I can tell it stuck with you though)



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 03:52 PM
link   
a reply to: seeker1963

What Griffin said:

Something wrong with hating Nazis then in your book?


What you responded with:

Ever hear of the Constitution Comrade?


Nowhere in his comment did Gryphon say anything about becoming violent towards anybody.

I do get it buddy. I know you get your little chubby going good when you think you've got me on something, but I'm not the one that just tried to point to the Constitution in response to somebody asking if it was okay to hate Nazis.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 03:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

Well, to be fair, some have postulated that hatred is tantamount to violence, that Nazis marching is tantamount to invasion, etc.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 03:54 PM
link   
It has been proven beyond any shadow of any doubt that those who came to the UTR rally intended violence.

They were met by those that chose to stand up against that violence.

Next?



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 03:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Nikola014

You're trying to make race simply a matter of skin color and then argue that because Nazis had a far more nuanced system of racial categorization that they were actually "targeting" people on the basis of nationality.

That argument falls flat without even getting into the specifics of Nazi race theory.

The Jewish people didn't have a nation and neither did or do the Romani. In fact, the Jews and Romani that concerned them most were those in Germany. Slavs are spread across a number of nations. Nazis did in fact see blacks as an inferior race — on par with Slavs — and any blacks in Germany were covered under the same Nuremberg Laws as the Jews (as were Romanis).

EDIT:

It's true that Nazis weren't white supremacists because they viewed as inferior, people most today would lump into the category of "white" but it's not because, as you're clearly trying to assert, that they weren't racist. They were uber racists. Their racism was just more complex than white supremacy.
edit on 2017-8-25 by theantediluvian because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 03:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66




Good to know how you really feel about the Constitution.


I have more respect for it than our resident comissar does.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 03:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: seeker1963

What Griffin said:

Something wrong with hating Nazis then in your book?


What you responded with:

Ever hear of the Constitution Comrade?


Nowhere in his comment did Gryphon say anything about becoming violent towards anybody.

I do get it buddy. I know you get your little chubby going good when you think you've got me on something, but I'm not the one that just tried to point to the Constitution in response to somebody asking if it was okay to hate Nazis.


Ummm, you cherry picked. One exchange of words to try and prove your point.

My answer to you is, "You can hate anyone you want". It's when violence comes in because of that hate things become a problem.

Let's say I HATE YOU! Does that give me a right to assault you?

So keep on chirping Mall Cop!



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 04:00 PM
link   
Nazis were definitely bad. But make no mistake. Genocide happens every day without the attention of MSM. What about the Rwandan genocide for example? America didn't enter WW2 to fight Nazis. It was because Germany declared war on America. America stood by for 10 years while Nazis killed Jews. Don't tell me what Americans did was completely moral.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 04:03 PM
link   
a reply to: intrepid

Sorry man most of the ideology and hate talk are quite similar. In this case that quacking, waddling mallard is a duck



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 04:04 PM
link   
NM. My bad.
edit on 25-8-2017 by Gryphon66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 04:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66




Or is it merely your intention to degrade America?


Like our country is some shiny beacon ?

Between the japanese interment.

segregation.

slavery.

Native American genocide.

Giving STDS to african americans.

Segregated military units during war against nazis.

The LEFT wanted war.

The Right were isolationist.

And today the right is getting called natzees!

That degradation is duly earned.

Not to mention dropping two nuclear weapons on civilians.

Fire bombing both Germany, and Japan.

That era was complete and utter SNIP.
edit on 25-8-2017 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 04:08 PM
link   
a reply to: TheTory

Of course. And for some, words are somehow violence, and can be responded to with actual violence.

But in the context of what Gryphon asked, I don't think one can reasonably draw the conclusion that he was equating hating Nazis with going out and physically attacking them.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 04:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Gryphon66




Or is it merely your intention to degrade America?


Like our country is some shiny beacon ?

Between the japanese interment.

segregation.

slavery.

Native American genocide.

Giving STDS to african americans.

Segregated military united during war against nazis.

The LEFT wanted war.

The Right were isolationist.

And today the right is getting called natzees!

That degradation is duly earned.

Not to mention dropping two nuclear weapons on civilians.

Fire bombing both Germany, and Japan.

That era was complete and utter SNIP.


Yeah, tried to get rid of that silly comment ... oh well.

I'm sorry you have such hatred in your heart for America Neo.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 04:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

If you fight Nazis with violence, then you are no better than a Nazi.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 04:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66




I'm sorry you have such hatred in your heart for America Neo.


Well I guess I could have ran around calling half the country deplorable, a presidential candidate a rapists,russian spy, and white supremacist, and all his supporters nazis.

That wasn't HATEFUL at all.
edit on 25-8-2017 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 04:11 PM
link   
a reply to: seeker1963


Ummm, you cherry picked. One exchange of words to try and prove your point.


Ummm Gryphon asked a question. You responded to it. Responding directly to your response is not cherry picking.


My answer to you is, "You can hate anyone you want". It's when violence comes in because of that hate things become a problem.


Great, we agree then.


Let's say I HATE YOU! Does that give me a right to assault you?


Is this you challenging somebody to a fight again? Oh, wait, no...given the context of your question, I can infer that you're simply asking a question and not implying a wish to visit physical harm on anybody. Kinda like Gryphon's question.


So keep on chirping Mall Cop!


It's like you think if you say it often enough you're going to upset me or something? You need to seriously up your game if that's what you're going for.



new topics

top topics



 
23
<< 17  18  19    21  22 >>

log in

join