It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is There an Official USA-Certified List of HATE SYMBOLS?

page: 2
9
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 24 2017 @ 09:16 PM
link   
Here is what think is a symbol of hate. It fact, it is quite "deplorable" to me.




posted on Aug, 24 2017 @ 10:52 PM
link   
a reply to: myselfaswell


I had to have My Wife do the apple™ I-Tunes and "We" just got done...

Security Question #2) On March 21, 1974 You were on a bus and a Lady w/a white hat gone on. How much change did She receive from the bus driver?

#3) The grade You received in 4th grade less the 'extra credit'?

Then I had to do an account for ChinaMart™ for My new iPodnano..



posted on Aug, 24 2017 @ 11:30 PM
link   
I found another symbol of hate. It is a subtle one, but it does deal in the hateful job of manipulating its viewers with politically based and biased reporting. That, IMO, is hateful.


I think I now know what ESPN stands for:

Extreme
Socialist
Programming
Network


edit on 8/24/2017 by Krakatoa because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 01:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
I found one.





That symbol certainly belongs in the National Hate-Symbol Registry, if the USA decides to develop one.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 01:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: WUNK22
No, he really has sucked as mayor. Can't get to work on time, late for everything, he's a reply to: carewemust

A total communist sympathizer and leftist troll.


Thanks, I didn't know de Blasio was so pitiful. I suppose the people of New York didn't know all that about him when electing this guy as their mayor.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 03:41 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr




To me the peace symbol is marred by official narrative, associating it with communism. Really, it was an anti war symbol used by demonstrators in the 60s, subverted to communist symbology by the MSM, the same way symbols are still subverted today.


The " Peace Symbol " was designed by British Artist Gerald Holtom. It was commissioned by CND ( Campaign For Nuclear Disarmament ) for a rally at Canterbury Cathedral in 1958.

It has no links to Communism.

mentalfloss.com...



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 04:50 AM
link   
a reply to: CynConcepts

If they have a swastika on a white circle, with a red background, then they are NOT indulging in ancient spiritualism, but engaged in hate.

There were no wannabe Jainists, Buddhists, or Hindus marching around with legitimate symbols of goodness in Charlottesville, which is what that combination is, and ALL it refers to. If you see that flag carried anywhere outside of a re-enactment or a war movie, then there is a Nazi around.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 05:03 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

This is not good. If this keeps up it is going to get real ugly real soon. Don't people feel like they are being pushed or herded?


edit on 25-8-2017 by Tarzan the apeman. because: I need coffee.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 05:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krakatoa
Here is what think is a symbol of hate. It fact, it is quite "deplorable" to me.

You know that symbol "H" for Hillary also represents the twin towers, the arrow symbolic for 'forward' (Obamas second campaign slogan), his first was change we can believe in. The same as Trumps, make america great again.

There is no difference between then and now...

There has been no change, their game et al, remans the same.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 06:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: intrptr




To me the peace symbol is marred by official narrative, associating it with communism. Really, it was an anti war symbol used by demonstrators in the 60s, subverted to communist symbology by the MSM, the same way symbols are still subverted today.


The " Peace Symbol " was designed by British Artist Gerald Holtom. It was commissioned by CND ( Campaign For Nuclear Disarmament ) for a rally at Canterbury Cathedral in 1958.

It has no links to Communism.

mentalfloss.com...


I know that. But ask the current generation in the uS what it is associated with, they will tell you hippies from the 60s.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 06:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96


Mayor de Blasio said he already has one specific target in mind: a sidewalk marker in downtown Manhattan for Nazi collaborator Henri Phillipe Petain.




Well they better ban George Soros.

He was a nazi collaborator.


Let's see if the mayor has the guts to follow his own prescribed criteria of hate symbols.........won't be holding my breath. I mean Democrats can't be symbols of hate, only Republicans can do that.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 06:26 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust




(i.e. The "Fighting Irish")


This for one will never happen.
Have you ever been to Indiana?
They are a little nutty over the Fighting Irish
.

I think the whole thing is dumb personally.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 06:56 AM
link   
Oh look, found two more:





posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 07:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Kromlech

Well, you may as well add the British Flag to your list then.

I mean, my people killed a heap of Nazis and were proud to do it in the main. My forebears certainly were. And lets face it, if it ever goes down like that again, I will be under one of those flags, and I will ensure it drinks its fill of fascist blood, so you may as well include it, if being against fascism and Nazism and prepared to kill to defeat it, is a metric you are genuinely trying to apply for inclusion in a list of hate symbols... utter poppycock of course, but since we are all being good and stupid about this, and failing to see there is a difference between hate itself and the combating of it, you may as well.

Damned incompetents are everywhere.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 07:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Kromlech

Well, you may as well add the British Flag to your list then.

I mean, my people killed a heap of Nazis and were proud to do it in the main. My forebears certainly were. And lets face it, if it ever goes down like that again, I will be under one of those flags, and I will ensure it drinks its fill of fascist blood, so you may as well include it, if being against fascism and Nazism and prepared to kill to defeat it, is a metric you are genuinely trying to apply for inclusion in a list of hate symbols... utter poppycock of course, but since we are all being good and stupid about this, and failing to see there is a difference between hate itself and the combating of it, you may as well.

Damned incompetents are everywhere.


Oh I know, ANTIFA and BLM's VIOLENCE gets a "free pass." Anyone with differing opinions to these idiots is a "Nazi" by default. How much more does their actions have to speaker LOUDER than their words? Evidently your head has been in the sand this passed year, or in denial...


Damned incompetents are everywhere.

Agreed.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 08:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
I ask this question, because America's largest city, New York City, has started an intense 90 day investigation to identify all "hate symbols" in the city, and take appropriate action.

The city has already identified one "symbol of hate" for removal.

Mayor de Blasio said he already has one specific target in mind: a sidewalk marker in downtown Manhattan for Nazi collaborator Henri Phillipe Petain.
Full Article: nypost.com...

It seems that without a government-certified list of symbols that constitute HATE, identifying all of them is too subjective...too open to interpretation. And probably some lawsuits as well.

Do you prefer that each city determine what constitutes "hate"? Personally, I think the entire movement is crazy. A slippery slope that can end up making America barren of Statues, Christmas Trees, Crosses, along with banning certain nicknames and mascots for sports teams. (i.e. The "Fighting Irish")

-CareWeMust


The list will include anything that could help and not hurt DeBlasio's reelection campaign.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 08:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Kromlech

So, you think that all those people with Swastikas, chanting Blood and Soil, throwing Nazi salutes, and screaming about white power, were somehow not Nazis? Would you rather ACTUAL fascism was not challenged? Because the only people challenging actual fascists in this day and age, are ANTIFA. The police are not doing it. The secret service are not doing it. Trump is not doing it. There are no people in MAGA hats beating down Nazis and laying the law down to the fascist horde, so what do you propose? Appease them? Allow them a platform?

Do you know nothing of history, or are you eager to see it repeat perhaps? How deep is YOUR head in the sand?



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 08:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: CynConcepts

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: carewemust


along with banning certain nicknames and mascots for sports teams. (i.e. The "Fighting Irish")


Like Washington Redskins or the White House?

Symbols are different than icons or monuments (like statues).

Everyone knows a swastika, that it represents hate. But What about the cross, the peace symbol, the smiley face ?Someone is always offended.

I vote to ban traffic signs. But that represents the road we're all on, the future will be hieroglyphic, everything has symbols in the new multiculture.







Seriously, everyone? Hindus, Buddhists, and Jainists all have recognized the swatsika as a very good symbol. That is why the Nazi's claimed it for themselves. The other religions have a much longer symbolism than the limited and short lived nazism.

Source:India Times

Believe me...America is still a melting pot and there are many of those faiths who live and visit here. Just because someone has a swatsika, does NOT mean they are a nazi or HATE!




This is the single most absurd and ridiculous thing I've ever read on ATS.

Just because someone has a swastika, does not mean they are a Nazi or hate.

I mean. I'm just speechless. Really.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 08:06 AM
link   
1st Amendment

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.



posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 08:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Kromlech

So, you think that all those people with Swastikas, chanting Blood and Soil, throwing Nazi salutes, and screaming about white power, were somehow not Nazis? Would you rather ACTUAL fascism was not challenged? Because the only people challenging actual fascists in this day and age, are ANTIFA. The police are not doing it. The secret service are not doing it. Trump is not doing it. There are no people in MAGA hats beating down Nazis and laying the law down to the fascist horde, so what do you propose? Appease them? Allow them a platform?

Do you know nothing of history, or are you eager to see it repeat perhaps? How deep is YOUR head in the sand?


Let's see, ANTIFA/BLM accomplishments so far: Rioting, looting, mobbing/bullying white voters, arson, and trying to stop free speech through violence. Oh look, FASCISM is what they've accomplished. THEY are the NEW KKK.




top topics



 
9
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join