It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: jacobe001
a reply to: face23785
True or False
All parties involved in Capitalism should have bargaining rights?
True, but that doesn't necessarily mean equal rights.
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: jacobe001
This isn't a philosophy class. Real world economics is a lot more complicated than true and false questions from one of your electives in college. There are literally thousands of laws to protect workers in this country. There are still people that get exploited, and that sucks. All I'm saying is overall we've got it really good here. You may not have it as good as you want it. There's # I want that I don't have because I can't afford it. Tough.
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: jacobe001
This isn't a philosophy class. Real world economics is a lot more complicated than true and false questions from one of your electives in college.
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: jacobe001
It's not textbook capitalism just like it's not textbook democracy. It's colloquially called that because many aspects of it represent that system, even if it doesn't meet the technical definition.
And even assigning the word fascism to it is a historically illiterate comment.
originally posted by: jacobe001
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: jacobe001
It's not textbook capitalism just like it's not textbook democracy. It's colloquially called that because many aspects of it represent that system, even if it doesn't meet the technical definition.
And even assigning the word fascism to it is a historically illiterate comment.
That is a matter of opinion insofar as whose definition we use, I mean definitions are always changing especially when it comes to politicians and propaganda
Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power
Benito Mussolini
Some say that this quote is not accurate
Mussolini was most definitely a Fascist and he most definitely supported corporatism from his writings
I get what your saying, don't rock the boat since we all have it good
No, we do not all have it good
There are tent cities in America, there are people in debt to their eye balls because of Expensive healthcare that can charge whatever they feel like, there are more people on the off ramps with signs for food that I have seen in years
This country is in debt up to our ears, we have infrastructure falling apart and yet we always seem to have trillions for more wars.
What we have is not WORKING
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: jacobe001
With a representative republic like we have, even if you only put the most altruistic people in power, you're naturally going to wind up with a patchwork of extremely complicated laws over the course of several hundred years. Not that I think our leaders have been altruistic, but it definitely doesn't take some secret society master plan to wind up like this. All it takes is hundreds of representatives of millions of people all with different views on how it's best to run things, and a lot of time.
I can't argue it would be nice to see a lot of things simplified. Like the tax code.
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: jacobe001
I can't argue against the concept it would be better to get more varied representation in DC. We're in total agreement there. But whose fault is that? I remember a discussion about Congress in the front office a few years back. Someone labeled Congress a bunch of dummies and our old retired Chief corrected him with "They must be smarter than you think because about 90% of them get re-elected."
Translation: we're the dummies.
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: jacobe001
Luckily there's only so much damage the president can do without help from Congress. So what about Congress? A lot of people seem to have the illusion that their rep isn't the problem. It's always the other guy. So someone vote them out, but I'm keeping my guy! And then most of them are back next session and nothing changes.
originally posted by: TruMcCarthy
I have to ask, what the hell are people spending their money on? I don't make that much money, yet still have plenty in the bank, and plenty in cash. I don't have children, so I'm wondering, are kids that damn expensive? I don't know how people live paycheck to paycheck, I would die from the worry and stress.