It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xaphan
originally posted by: FissionSurplus
I highly doubt the people who smashed the Columbus statue in Baltimore have any of that blood in them. Columbus did not victimize Africans, but hey, jump on that bandwagon with the square wheels and clunk along just because.
A recurrent theme I observed several years back—as politically incorrect as it might seem—is that people whose ancestors came from a culture that had little to no historical achievements, notable inventions, scientific breakthroughs, etc., are more likely to behave in a destructive manner towards more advanced, refined cultures. I'm not saying this is a race issue; I don't know what it is exactly—some kind of deep-seated cultural jealousy? An inferiority complex?
I've already witnessed this 'inferiority complex' in the form of websites made by people of African descent who edit history and claim that they were the leaders of, well... pretty much every single ancient civilization. (You have to scroll to the bottom of the page to see what I mean.)
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: JinMI
Nope. We will put them on government property. Kids will be able to see them in public parks and learn all about mass shooters and serial killers. Everyone will benefit, so everyone needs to pay for them.
originally posted by: FissionSurplus
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: FissionSurplus
Done with this and that, so done I'm starting a thread about it.
Jealousy is an ugly thing. I'm sorry you missed my message.
originally posted by: verschickter
a reply to: Gothmog
Well, by definition of the word "discover", he actually did.
He dis-covered america, currently not known by the society he was living in. If I follow your logic, nothing is ever "discovered" by anyone because you can´t proof it. Nothing is ever "invented" by a single entity because you can´t proof that no one before has ever done it -or not.
English is my third language, yet I´m very confident what you wrote is wrong.
verb (used with object)
1.
to see, get knowledge of, learn of, find, or find out; gain sight or knowledge of (something previously unseen or unknown [sic: to the one in the act of discovering]):
originally posted by: FissionSurplus
a reply to: Blarneystoner
His racially charged rhetoric
Huh? I have never heard the president say anything negative about race. This is one of many accusations that the left uses to excuse their hatred. You are told by the Bobble-Head Dem politicians that he is a racist, and y'all run with it. I HAVE heard Hillary say negative things about blacks, and I just LOVE the picture of her and Bill when he was governor of Arkansas in black face for Halloween.
If you hate him, that's your business. But to parrot lies.....yikes.
This is the key to the globalist agenda. So nazi-esque. If you repeat a lie enough times, people will believe it to be a fact.
How many people are running around fretting because some ignoramus politician here in Georgia said that we shouldn't put too much on the island of Guam because it'll tip over from the weight?
originally posted by: FissionSurplus
You IMBECILES. You destructive, moronic, hateful losers! WHAT are you doing???
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: alphabetaone
The fact that anyone over a certain age knows who he is and what he did makes him historically significant.