It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I'm Done With The Left's Nonsense

page: 14
149
<< 11  12  13   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 9 2017 @ 09:29 AM
link   
a reply to: pteridine

Bernie is not a democrat so of course he wasn't the DNCs first choice. I don't care about Podesta's emails. Only Republicans and Hillary haters do. So that debate is moot with a democrat. The primaries are a lawless contest.




posted on Sep, 9 2017 @ 11:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: pteridine

Bernie is not a democrat so of course he wasn't the DNCs first choice. I don't care about Podesta's emails. Only Republicans and Hillary haters do. So that debate is moot with a democrat. The primaries are a lawless contest.


Of course the deck was stacked. We had a black president and the mob needed a female president regardless of her shortcomings. Many saw through her and were put off by her behavior and apparent greed. Had she been elected, many of her supporters would have been shocked at her actual positions on things which were much further right than she let on during the campaign. Had she not played the part she did for the votes of the far left, she might have won. She didn't bother to campaign in some states which said that she either wrote them off or presumed she would win.
As to the Podesta emails, some of my liberal friends refuse to read them. They are in the "la la la I can't hear you" mode because they don't want the bubble to burst. It would also lower the level of their unreasonable hatred of Trump and they don't want that either.
Actually, a good portion of my Dem friends are open-minded enough to happily debate any issue.



posted on Sep, 9 2017 @ 12:31 PM
link   
a reply to: pteridine

The democrats lost. What's to debate. You won't sway my opinion nor can I sway your opinion of why.



posted on Sep, 9 2017 @ 01:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: pteridine

The democrats lost. What's to debate. You won't sway my opinion nor can I sway your opinion of why.


My opinion of why is that she was a worse candidate than Trump. Now we watch and wait until the next election to see what happens. Trump is trying to light a fire under congress and, if he is successful, they may get something done after many years of gridlock under Barack "Executive Order" Obama.
McConnell, Schumer, and Pelosi should leave, along with Watters and Jackson-Lee.

No more Bush, Clinton [Including Chelsea] or Obama candidates are needed.



posted on Sep, 9 2017 @ 02:38 PM
link   
a reply to: pteridine

The worst of the two. That is true if you believed the pizza parlor child slavery rumors. Who wouldn't vote for the groper.



posted on Sep, 9 2017 @ 03:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: pteridine

The worst of the two. That is true if you believed the pizza parlor child slavery rumors. Who wouldn't vote for the groper.

Pizza parlor stuff was difficult to take seriously. I think most ignored it. Groping was just locker room braggadocio. Bill, on the other hand, was a serial philanderer. He couldn't touch Kennedy when it came to philandering but he was giving it a try.
Hilly would have been an Obama 2 in many ways and appointed as many females and minorities to positions of power based on gender and race. With the GOP in the Congressional majority, she would have had to rule by executive order but I think she could have negotiated better than Obama.



posted on Sep, 10 2017 @ 08:06 AM
link   
a reply to: pteridine

This is a revealing post. I have been baffled why people wanted believe all the horrible lies about one woman. Why anyone but Hillary, even an anti christ.
It was The Fear that you can't compete with women and minorities. Thank you for lifting that veil.



posted on Sep, 10 2017 @ 09:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: pteridine

This is a revealing post. I have been baffled why people wanted believe all the horrible lies about one woman. Why anyone but Hillary, even an anti christ.
It was The Fear that you can't compete with women and minorities. Thank you for lifting that veil.


This was a truthful post. I understand that Obama put minorities and females in place to provide the proof that they could perform as any other groups. Hilly would have done the same with females in another identity politics play and we would have been swamped with all sorts of her cohorts. Would you trust Huma as Security? Debbie as SoS? I do think Hilly would have been able to get more done than Obama did but that seems to be a low bar.

As to me, I have no fear of competing with anybody head-to-head and have not ever had that fear. How do you know I am not one of those "minorities?" I don't wear a veil to lift.
When I hired people, I hired for skill. If a one-legged purple hermaphroditic Martian named "Hoppy" had the right engineering skills, I would hire hrim without a second thought. I never hired to fill my Martian quota. The executives carry enough dead wood as it is.
I didn't believe all those "horrible lies" but I did look at the evidence. Pay for play while Hilly was SoS was evident. Laundering donations from foreign governments and heads of state through the Clinton Foundation was greed personified. A 12 million dollar donation by Morocco resulted in weapons for them. The appearance of conflict of interest IS conflict of interest. The appearance of Hilly selling influence for personal gain is COI. She should have suspended donations to the Foundation from foreign entities during her term as SoS.....but she didn't. She lied to congress about her DIY server. She lied to Congress about classified documents on a non-secure system. She destroyed evidence and obstructed justice. She tried to blame Powell and anyone else she could think of for her actions. She is a duplicitous, greedy, self-serving individual and I am relieved that she gave away the presidency through poor campaigning.
Your claim of Trump as the anti-Christ is most telling of your bias. What has he done to earn that title? I remember that immediately after the election, all the wailing that Trump would do this and do that and that he had to go. Pink hatted marchers with that muslim shill Linda Sarsour who would bring Sharia to the US and suppress all the women marching with her. Had Hilly won, would the hats have had cigars crowning them?
Trump has done nothing so far but try to light a fire under a Congress that has been idle for years. Calling him the anti-Christ is amusing to those who are not invested in identity politics. Wait four years and see if the idiots who run the DNC have learned anything.

Stay Calm and Politic on.



posted on Sep, 10 2017 @ 09:59 AM
link   
a reply to: pteridine
Your use of hilly shows your bias. I notice that you don't say trumpy.

Personally, my plan is to encourage the DNC to forget DC. Let the Republicans have the problems. Democrats need to find solutions for bad times ahead. They do that by democrats talking to people locally for the next few years.



posted on Sep, 10 2017 @ 06:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: pteridine
Your use of hilly shows your bias. I notice that you don't say trumpy.

Personally, my plan is to encourage the DNC to forget DC. Let the Republicans have the problems. Democrats need to find solutions for bad times ahead. They do that by democrats talking to people locally for the next few years.


I use Hilly as that is what others call HILLarY. I don't remember calling her anything else. I don't have a bias; I have a preference for those not named Clinton [Hillary, Bill or Chelsea] or Bush, or Obama.

The DNC will not "forget" DC because that is where the power is. No swamp dweller will leave the power of the swamp. The Republicans have inherited the problems from Obama just as Obama inherited problems from Bush. They will muddle through even though the Republicans and Democrats do not like Trump's proposed changes and Trump may well be a force of unity merely by being where he is.






























































edit on 9/10/2017 by pteridine because: clarification



posted on Sep, 10 2017 @ 07:55 PM
link   
a reply to: pteridine

Sorry, I don't buy you are not bias just as you accuse others.

I think it is time for the buck to stop somewhere. The next 3.5 years would be a good time to let the Republicans try their ideas without obstruction. If were asked, I would tell the DNC to kick back.



posted on Sep, 10 2017 @ 08:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: pteridine

Sorry, I don't buy you are not bias just as you accuse others.

I think it is time for the buck to stop somewhere. The next 3.5 years would be a good time to let the Republicans try their ideas without obstruction. If were asked, I would tell the DNC to kick back.


If you can't buy it, you can't. I have never referred to Hillary as the anti-Christ as you and others have called The Donald. I find it amusing. If he was the 666th President, you could have a connection.

The DNC as an organization can't stop. Hillary can't stop and is pushing her new book and mouthing off. She is somewhat immune from prosecution because it would look bad to put a former First Lady on trial. Politically, she is done and now will do her best to earn money. She should walk away from the DNC so as not to poison the next candidate but she loves the limelight too much.

There are some DNC folks that are kicking back. Debbie is laying low over her choice of IT contractor. She will take a fall for the party. Huma and the Weiner are in hiding. Podesta has disappeared.



posted on Sep, 10 2017 @ 08:40 PM
link   
a reply to: pteridine

That sounds like good stuff. There is no one obstructing the Republicans from governing and investigating.



posted on Sep, 13 2017 @ 11:11 PM
link   
I've had no choice but to shift my focus away from the leftist idiots. I'm sure they aren't all idiots, but the loudest ones are. They perceive the world through their subjective feelings rather than using reasoning and logic. Logic is fairly objective and can be applied to any perception of the world to help make sense of it. But it doesn't work if you whine and cry at the drop of a hat over some emotionally perceived wrongdoing. I just made a video on this topic exactly on my YouTube channel. I talk about how the with the advent of the internet, everyone has a voice, even the people that we don't want to hear! If you're interested in watching it I'll link it below. I hope that more of us will just realize giving them all of our energy is exactly what they want and it's not conducive to a healthy life for us. They can cry and complain until they're blue in the face, and I just don't care anymore.



The Internet Gives EVERYONE A Voice - Even Idiots...



posted on Sep, 14 2017 @ 10:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lab4Us

originally posted by: usernameconspiracy
The left has no more to do with the morons doing this dumb crap than the right has to do with the far fringe of it's party. A vocal minority. Most of the left, like most of the right, has nothing but contempt for the extreme fringes of their respective parties.


Technically that is incorrect. As long as the talking heads of the left (Shumer, Pelosi, CNN, et al.) continue to promote the myth that destroying property and removing history is going to turn all of America into rainbows and butterflies for those that are disenfranchised, the Left absolutely owns the vandalism as a collective. Once they (the leaders of the Left) denounce the actions, then your argument will hold water.


In what way? How can you possibly argue anything technically on an opinion based tirade against a legitimate claim to not roping people together? "All Muslims are terrorists because extremist Muslim leaders condone terrorism"



posted on Sep, 18 2017 @ 02:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: pteridine

The worst of the two. That is true if you believed the pizza parlor child slavery rumors. Who wouldn't vote for the groper.


pizza parlour was a preposterous exaggeration to hide the smoke from things like the lolita express, attempted child kidnappings in haiti(Laura Silsby), and strange language in the podesta emails. Not to mention the 50,000+ dollars in hot dogs for some activity at the white house(note that hot dog has an underground pedo meaning in some circles).

The thing is the owner of the pizza parlour appeared to host online images of children in highly inappropriate pictures and had sexual commentary on photos of infants. They also apparently host a music group that uses known pedo symbols. Of course that, and the weird art involving minors of those involved in the scandal, does not mean actual minors were ever harmed.
edit on 18-9-2017 by Xenogears because: (no reason given)

edit on 18-9-2017 by Xenogears because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 18 2017 @ 03:39 PM
link   
Everyone always paints the left as easily offended, but last I checked, you are the one being offended by this statue business. Sorry but the right also gets offended easily. You guys get offended any time an atheist speaks out against unconstitional religious positions even though they are right, you are offended when people stand up for themselves when being oppressed, offended by abortion, offended by gay marriage, offended by climate change science and being told to reduce pollution, offended by gun regulations and the list goes on and on. But the left are the snowflakes, right?

Columbus is like what? Part of the THIRD group (maybe even 4th) to make it to America and he gets all the credit to appease the Italians and give them a special holiday and cute false story for children in school. The guy did bad things in the name of religion, conquest and profit. He wasn't on a discovery quest, he was on a take over quest. Honestly, I'm all for ditching Columbus day as a national holiday. It's dumb. The Vikings were here long before Columbus as were the "native" Americans. We don't have a Vikings day, or a national Native American holiday that closes schools and government agencies.

Sorry I just find the whole one side blaming the other for everything to be old and redundant at this point. Both sides are annoying and they are offensive to intelligence. Claiming the end is near because people remove offensive statues or try to correct the false narrative of history that we have been fed all these years, and saying that the eclipse is a sign of end times is just the oldest nonsense in the book and it gets old. The world isn't ending, unless we end it ourselves by ignoring the state of our planet for short term profit and gain.



new topics

top topics



 
149
<< 11  12  13   >>

log in

join