It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: DBCowboy
Then we get to fall back on that idea that we can defeat an ideology.
Cultural experts told Cheney/Bush - - you can't fight an ideology.
They thought they could.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: Willtell
With all the technology and military power how is it that the US doesn’t crush the Taliban?
Technology is an interesting thing, it works best when countering other technology around the same level of development. Since the Taliban has little in the way of technology, our tech doesn't do much. Lots of our advantages for example are in electronics warfare... something the terrorists completely blank. Air strikes don't matter much either, since they hide in caves and aren't building infrastructure.
The terrain blanks a lot of our advantage, we've also been traditionally weak to suicide attacks.
Lastly, is the economic difference. Every soldier killed or wounded costs us much more money than it costs them. This creates a financial imbalance that will eventually topple the military.
Assault forces don't do well against decentralized armies. They're great at taking fortified positions, but our enemies mostly don't use those against us.
I was doing some reading earlier and it seems that Trump is open to a diplomatic solution with the Taliban. We leave, they regain power, if they curtail terrorism. He only briefly touched on that in his speech, but it seems to be an option on the table. Of course, to make that happen we probably need to appoint an ambassador to Kabul at some point.
originally posted by: CranialSponge
a reply to: dragonridr
Understood, and that's a valid point.
But you can't help build a nation AND fight at the same time.
Imagine how many troops on the ground it will take to do both of those things at the same time, and for how long.
Because after the war has ended (assuming the terrorists are finally beat) then and only then, can the real rebuilding begin.
So maybe 100,000 troops plus an additional 100,000+ from allied countries for what? Another 5 years ? 10 ? 20 ?
It's 16 years in now...
Ugh, what a nightmare of disaster we've made for ourselves in the middle east.
The war was over in 2001 we had won.
originally posted by: Willtell
This is a very strange war. The Taliban doesn’t have big countries behind them supposedly like N Vietnam did in Russia and China…
originally posted by: CranialSponge
And do you know what makes the guerrilla warfare tactics of these (nothing to lose) terrorists even worse ?
They literally have the entire planet to hide in and conduct their under-the-radar strategies.
They can spread out quietly like rats blending into the environment anywhere and everywhere across the globe and pick us all off one by one by one.
Who we fight and run out of Afghanistan today, shows up in Mongolia the next day, France the day after that, Lithuania the day after that, Tahiti the day after that...
That's not entirely true. Terrorists need areas to train and need support which can be destroyed.
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: Annee
They beat communism...that's an ideology
They beat Nazism...that's an ideology
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: Annee
They beat communism...that's an ideology
They beat Nazism...that's an ideology
originally posted by: Willtell
All that you say convinces me that the only way to win is a massive force. I know that's not a panacea and would be challenging but that would I think finally win...massive numbers. But as of now the US wont go that way...
originally posted by: CranialSponge
So maybe 100,000 troops plus an additional 100,000+ from allied countries for what? Another 5 years ? 10 ? 20 ?
It's 16 years in now...
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: Annee
They beat communism...that's an ideology
They beat Nazism...that's an ideology
They didn't beat communism. There's communist countries today. What we did in the cold war was fight the SPREAD of Communism. Not try and defeat the actual ideology. Simultaneously, the USSR was fighting the SPREAD of Capitalism/Democracy.
The ideology of Nazism wasn't destroyed either, 9% of Americans identify with white supremacists, and we've had many rallies over the past two weeks promoting that very thing.