It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Are solar eclipses proof of God?

page: 9
6
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 10 2017 @ 07:38 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

Tell you what, let me teach you how to construct a "fear of X" word.

You want Fear of Christianity.

Christian-o-phobia. Now shorten it by removing the hyphens. Christianophobia.

I pick that phobia you were trying to suggest, as well there is no "holy preserved bible". It is one of the most heavily edited, heavily mistranslated (inadvertently and on purpose) documents in existence.

Hence a fantasticle beast called the "holy preserved bible" is up there with being afraid of magic nose goblins




posted on Sep, 10 2017 @ 07:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Noinden

Sorry, I didn't think. Of course it would need to be in non erasable ink.

Just put it down to a brain fart lol.



posted on Sep, 10 2017 @ 07:42 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

There's no "might" about it. It's in Collin's.

But I'm not surprised you half heartedly dismiss it. Wouldn't want the fake Christian to be wrong now.



posted on Sep, 10 2017 @ 07:43 PM
link   
a reply to: Noinden

I'm afraid of magic nose goblins.

I'm a magicnosegoblinophobe!
edit on 1092017 by TerryDon79 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 10 2017 @ 07:48 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

Why would I read that cover to cover? Reading a book "cover to cover" does not you understand it. I'm not a Medical Doctor. I've read Advanced Organic Chemistry by March, Protective Groups in Organic synthesis by Greene, because they are applicable to my work. More importantly I understand the practices described in side them. As evidenced by successfully bringing multiple Pharmaceutical projects per year, to cleints. At scale (up to tons).

You have constructed a strawman argument, based on an unverifiable statement of how often you've read a book, that is probably not the most recent edition. Followed by name dropping Medical Students at Yale and Harvard (you do get there are other universities, more prestegious right?): www.timeshighereducation.com...#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats

I'm also going to point out many of your doctors do not hold Doctorates in Medicine. You get those by publishing original research in any branch of medical science. Now do many doctors hold this? Yes. All no. Your standard doctor might not. They are still qualified to be a Doctor.

Once again, you don't understand how things work.

You accused me of using a non English word. You were wrong. You rely on singular works, rather than using research abilities to grok things. Hence just like thinking your bible is the irrefutable word of God, as opposed to the words of Man, means you will fail very often.

On the other hand, I do research for a living, my faith also requires the ability to research. Hence I fail less often.

You created a straw man at the OP and you are clinging to it



posted on Sep, 10 2017 @ 07:49 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

Many co-workers fresh from academia don't get it either. Not a big deal



posted on Sep, 10 2017 @ 07:50 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

I still don't get why you'd read a book that is out of date, cover to cover? But hey, he claims to read the Bible too, probably practices bibomancy



posted on Sep, 10 2017 @ 07:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Noinden

I think it comes down to "look at me! I'm teh smart!!1!1111!!"

His posts here tell me he doesn't have a grasp on English (he tried telling me an X wasn't a cross as well lol) and he's very angry.

It's very amusing reading his replies and trying to wiggle his way out of his own words though lol.
edit on 1092017 by TerryDon79 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 10 2017 @ 09:38 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

Hmm possibly. I just wish he had put the effort into showing how one can demonstrate Deity using mathmatics. It would be nice, instead we got clickbait



posted on Sep, 11 2017 @ 06:25 AM
link   
a reply to: Noinden

Were you expecting anything other than click bait? Every thread that tries "proving god" is the same.



posted on Sep, 11 2017 @ 03:04 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

No, but he's put a great deal of effort into arguing its not click bait
Thus it would be nice if one of this crowd actually put leg work in



posted on Sep, 12 2017 @ 10:31 AM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

You have already proven you believe in God whenever you call on his name to Damn people, call out to Jesus Christ when you hurt yourself or command people to go to hell. By these actions, of which you may say they are just curse words, but in fact they are your spirit bearing record of what you know is spiritually true. These types of calling out are known as FIATS.

Now back to the OP article and my fascination with the mathematics. Definition of mathematics: the science that studies and explains numbers, quantities, measurements, and the relations between them.

Now consider the relationship of the measurements that over millennium the size of the moon remains the same, and at a certain time measurement, the distance the moon passes between the Earth and the Sun when the earth is at a certain distance from the Earth. The size of the Sun's position at this time as seen from the earth (which is not its actual size but it size in position in distance). Like when the analogy was given of the 8 foot beach ball and the distance one would have to travel to make a BB cover the exact size in position of the 8 ft beach ball, which calculated at around 400 ft. Now all of these measurements coalesce at a certain measurement of time to cause an Eclipse. Now if one cannot find this fascination one must be dead.

Does it prove God? No.

But if we are to believe, which many do, that the first measurements of time was given in the preserved word of God as Day and Night making up a literal 24 hour day. This was Jesus very words on the measurements of a day "John 11:9 Jesus answered, Are there not twelve hours in the day . . . " He taught those words in the affirmative meaning as truth, not as a scribe but as one who had authority. It was from that Time measurement, I will use measurement to keep Noinded from being antsy over my use of Quantum.

If it is God, which you TerryDon79 have already affirmed through your many uses of fiats concerning God, His only Begotten and Hell, that has laid the foundation of measurements for us which was Day and Night, so we could figure out distance, heights, widths, depth, displacements, cubits (used later in Genesis 6) or a Square, Rectangles, Circles, called circuits in the Preserved word. Then if anything proves anything it is the one who gave us Light that we might see and divide. The very first mathematical equation is found in Genesis One verse 3-5 Division. We see division again in verse 6-8 when he created a container called the Firmament which contains our known universe. Then gave us later in Genesis 14-19 the Sun, moon and stars for Times (the continuation of the division of day and night), seasons every 3 months, and days (the divisions of the year into a square 4X3 months and 365 days But this calendar is a secular one not God's), and signs.

And if an Eclipse is a sign, or when the day or night lengthened or shortened or staid still we could determine that these may be signs.

Math was given us from God upon making the earth habitable for man. Because God made it uninhabitable for Lucifer and his angles when they tried to exalt a throne, which was not his though he claimed it as such, and iniquity was found in him, who at one time was perfect.

The explanation of the 365.2422 days a year, was the addition of two beings who decided to take the earth into their own hands and give it unto the prince and power of the air, that being Adam and Eve the addition comes from the fall of man. perverting the perfect environment and measurement God had given mankind. Hence the addition of almost a full quarter day per our secular year.

But consider what God gave to Israel, which was plagiarized by Mohamed in the 7th Century (600AD), was four weeks of seven days equaling 28 days in a month, times twelve (one month for each tribe) which is actually 336 day years. Then he commanded that they add every seventh year an additional month to their year a 13 month of 28 days. Which when divided over the previous seven was a 340 day years.

This from the original is now expanded to 365.2422 along with the rest of the second heaven but in 6 million years by hypothesis of corrupted math you would have us believe the moon will be to far out to even cause an eclipse. But at the elliptical system the moon will always be at one time or another a certain distance from the earth, which will be a certain distance from the Sun to cause an eclipse. Though it may last a day or a few seconds depending on where this distance coalesces.

Ah, math and the wonder of it never cease to amaze me, though men of corrupt minds develop corrupt measurements to which they arrive a corrupt calculations to fascinate the corrupted masses.



posted on Sep, 12 2017 @ 10:33 AM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

I do believe it is Noinden, that has been claiming to be the smart one. I like you are just as corrupted as he. I have one advantage of which neither of you have.

Can you guess what that is?



posted on Sep, 12 2017 @ 12:39 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

Oh look. ANOTHER angry rant by the fake Christian thinking that, if someone uses a word, they must be a Christian.

It's not my problem that you can't understand English. Maybe take some night classes?



posted on Sep, 12 2017 @ 12:40 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

I'm guessing your "advantage" is ignorance. That's the only thing that would explain anything you type.



posted on Sep, 12 2017 @ 02:06 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

Insulting people is against the T&C of ATS if you are not interested in the OP of this thread as well as other please go elsewhere.

You have been nothing short of antagonistic which is also against the T&C of ATS.



posted on Sep, 12 2017 @ 02:11 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

I guess you should stop doing it then.



posted on Sep, 12 2017 @ 02:14 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

This is my thread, and you have been nothing short of an unmentionable lower end of the human anatomy. And that is saying it politely.



posted on Sep, 12 2017 @ 02:16 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

And that's not an insult?

You don't like practicing what you preach, do you?



posted on Sep, 12 2017 @ 02:20 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

I did I kept it within boundaries of politeness as I am commanded. That was a loving response considering your antagonism.



new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join