It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Are solar eclipses proof of God?

page: 13
6
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 03:12 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

NO I have tried to maintain it is "corrupted", you interpret that to mean wrong. In the eyes of corrupted man corrupted math is correct and accurate, but to those who are of truth know that the basis of math the Day and night models that was corrupted by sin/man's fall know that it is corrupt and thereby not to be trusted, hence why God calls it, "science so called".

This is also why a new earth and heavens must be created then and only then can we calculate truthfully because we will know what is "from everlasting to everlasting". Now 1 plus 1 is always 2, that basic will not change. But when it comes to calculating the date of things past or yet to be, the futures our math does not work because we lack the understanding of the Everlasting Time Measurement/Quantum. We start off thinking that all material started on the same day and it did not. It all came from an Eternal source that we do not have the measurement of, yet anyway. That is why a fossil made on MT Saint Helen's when dug out three years later was dating over a million years. The material, the earth in this case which encased the leaf, was from the eternal source but the encasement of the leaf was three years prior.

Most of this info was deleted from digital copies of the magazines of the day, and is currently kept from your eyes for if you knew the truth then we would have to throw out some of our thoughts on the Age of our own planet and there goes the whole theory of Evolution. These theory's (theory's do not mean truth) are there so men can ignore their creator to whom they are accountable too.

But let's not get ahead of ourselves now.

now if the moon has moved 266.6666666666667 feet in 2,000 years the earth would cease to be habitable.

and if the Earth moves away from the sun 83.33333333333333 feet from the sun in 2,000 years then the earth would be inhabitable.

Now can you see how ridiculous it all is to claim the moon will move out the earth is moving out to or is it the sun and moon that are moving. Can't be known because both models will show the same issues.




posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 03:16 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

You said the maths is wrong, in a thread trying to use maths to prove your god.

It's hilarious!

And now you're trying to say the planet would be uninhabitable?

I'm just going to leave now. I don't think my sides can take any more laughter.



posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 03:19 PM
link   
Also ever wonder why you can see almost perfectly round craters on the moon. Very few are oblong to support science so called theory of that craters on the moon were caused by meteorites and other objects.
edit on 17-9-2017 by ChesterJohn because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 03:31 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

the math int he article was very interesting, and so far over 3000 years men have been calculating the eclipses and yet the moon is moving away from the earth at 1.5 (roughly) each year. If that be true then the Aztecs and the Chinese could not have predicted then unless they knew that and they couldn't because no one could until instruments were accurate to a mille-inch were made. i.e. the computer age which is what about 60 year old now. and at that some time the moon has moves over 83 feet away a phenomenal amount of space when it comes to the physical effects it would have on the earth alone. and the earth moving from the Sun the distance it is said to be moving would have already wiped out earth.

But the so called math about the moon being to far away in 600 millions years wile scientist believe the Sun is only 10 billions years old. If they are correct the earth has already moved out to far to support life in the last 10 billion years. Now seeing no man has ever scooped up a hand full of Sun to time date it via Urainium depletion rate. How did they ever come up with 10 billion years. Yet they can date a three year old fossil as millions of years old using that method.



posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 03:41 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

I've only messaged you my email. I do so again



posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 03:44 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

uninhabitable shows just how ridiculous the calculations are.

Something is wrong Terry when it comes to their calculations.

The earth would have ran past the point to support life by now.

imagine 1.5 inches a year time 10 billion. you know how far we would be from the sun at that rate?

Science is claiming the rates are a Constant we can rely on.

we are currently 92.96 million miles from the sun. If the earth has move from its original orbit where life could be started 3.8 Billion years ago, then we would currently be 5.7 billion miles out from the sun. Based on Science so called calculation of the age of the Sun and Earth. Life could not exist that distance from the sun


edit on 17-9-2017 by ChesterJohn because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 03:45 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

For the love of the Gods, at least know how long the plant has been here ....

The age of the Earth is approximately 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years



posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 03:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Noinden

googling again are we.



posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 03:48 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

No I went to a source I have in my office. I can access Journals via Search engines specialized to science.



posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 03:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Noinden

yeah still had to search which shows you ind is not with it.

1.5 inches per year for 3.8 Billion years ago when life supposedly started would put the earth at 5.7 billion miles out from the Sun



posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 03:53 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

You don't do metric? Typical


A scientist ALWAYS checks their facts. After all, findings get updated. You don't understand that do you? You got it wrong. Ten (10) Billion years vs 4.5 billion years is a very large margin of error. You just guessed the age, did you guess the oribitt change? I will get back to you after an Ops meeting. Oh and I will be using metric



posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 04:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Noinden

I am sorry thought I was still dealing with Terry.

the earth is currently 92.96 million miles from the sun

the Sun is 10 billion years old according to the source

4.8 Billion +/- the earth age according to the source

3.8 billion life began life according to the source, and in order for life to Evolve according to the source it need a constant distance from the Sun.

You were correct I gave the wrong calculation but still look at what it is

If the earth moves away form the sun at a conservative 0.5 inches or half an inch a year then we will be at 158,333,333.3333333 miles away from the Sun since life started on earth. 158 Million miles is further out that where we are today. So the math is wrong. I know the standard answer is the rotation of the sun is slowing thereby the slowing down of the earth going out. But to this date at the current rate we would already be a 158 plus million miles out even more, way to far for life to exist on the earth.

158,333,333.3333333 is further out than mars from the sun



edit on 17-9-2017 by ChesterJohn because: (no reason given)

edit on 17-9-2017 by ChesterJohn because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 04:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Noinden

do I have to convert it to metric?

You can do it.



posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 04:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Noinden

so what do I want with your email address?
edit on 17-9-2017 by ChesterJohn because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 04:39 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

You clearly are a lazy Scholar

So since you seem to be into making up facts (alternative facts perhaps?)

A few things

(a) The Earth as a Main Sequence star, is likely to be around 10 billion years. Its been here just under half of that.
(b) In that 10 billion years the sun will consume abot 0.1% of its mass.
(c) The distance from the sun is about 150 000 000 km
(d) The distance the earth will move in that time (ignoring when the sun gets to a larger size nearer the end of its existence) is going to be about 15 000 km
(e) Thus (Since you like ratios lets do a percentage) 15 000 / 150 000 000 x 100 = 0.01 % change
(f) This works out to be about 1.5 cm (less than an inch!) per year.
(g) That is nothing to worry about.



posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 04:40 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

You asked for it earlier. To send myself and Terry something. If you have forgotten... that is on you



posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 04:40 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

1.5 cm not inches! Learn to read the Units, who are you NASA trying to land a Mars rover? (Joke will be funny to those who remember)



posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 04:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Noinden

1.5cm is equal to .590551 inches which is over half an inch.

I asked for a mailing address to send Terry a preserved Bible. Do you want one?



posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 04:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Noinden

and .5 inches per year times 3.8 billion when life started would put the earth about 158.333,333.3333333 miles away from the Sun.

Giving up the .090551 of an inch to allow variable for mass loss of the sun and earth movement away simultaneously
edit on 17-9-2017 by ChesterJohn because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 17 2017 @ 05:03 PM
link   
a reply to: ChesterJohn

Sigh

You are wrong. Just accept it.

1 cm is 1/100 of a meter, which is 1/1000th of a km.

Thus in one year it changes by 0.000015 of a km.

The age of the sun is 4.5 not 3.8 billion years. Stop pulling numbers out of your rear!


This is about 67500 km, over the entire life of the sun to this point.

I admit I missed a zero out in my previous post. SO over the entire 10 billion years we expect the sun to be a star.... 150 000 km, which means 0.1% change. My bad.

None the less it is NOT 158 33 333 3333 miles. Well actually you typed 158.333,333.3333333 which I have no idea what sort of number that is. It looks like you had a stroke after 158.333 but I am assuming you mean 158 333, 333 333 333 miles. Which is suspiciously more than the distance from the sun


Fun!

Oh and sure send that bible. I like a laugh. You asked us both.







 
6
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join