Are solar eclipses proof of God?

a reply to: TerryDon79

then you know this "Professing themselves to be wise they have become fools".

originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: TerryDon79

then you know this "Professing themselves to be wise they have become fools".

That fits you VERY well.

a reply to: TerryDon79

and you as well or even more so. No insult just a pure observation as you claim to say of me.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

Because I can verify that maths work and you can't verify it doesn't?

You just keep using devices that rely on maths, while saying it's wrong. It sure helps your case lol.

a reply to: TerryDon79

OK the math is in two models and both models show the same exact movements in Geo or Helio centricism but you have yet to examine that truth for yourself.

And you call be ignorant, which is an insult that you think you never do.

Terry if the math was not corrupt then why do both models show the same thing?

a reply to: ChesterJohn

I never said I don't insult anyone. I obviously do.

But I also know enough about science and maths to verify the Moon is moving away from the Earth and there will no longer be any total solar eclipses.

a reply to: TerryDon79

for get the moon, if the math were not corrupted would not the two models of Geo centric and Helio centric differ?

yet both models show the same thing. To their confusion of science no one wants to address that amazing fact.

Not even you.

But you never looked and did the experiment of the models as I have.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

Forget the moon in a thread about the moon?

600 million years till no more total solar eclipses because the moon is moving away from the earth at roughly 1.5 inches per year.

The only "amazing fact" is you saying maths is wrong in a thread YOU created trying to prove your god by using MATHS.

a reply to: TerryDon79

if you would test the models you will find the moon is in it.

This is a truth you can verify today as a mathematical truth. But then you aren't really interested in truth.

The one thing missing from the moon figures you keep quoting is the person who made it and his control over it all.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

The truth is, the moon is moving roughly 1.5 inches away from Earth each year. That means, in roughly 600 million years, there will be no more total solar eclipses.

And I have checked the models. They all agree the maths is right and the moon is moving away from us at a rate of roughly 1.5 inches a year.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

You are leaving out the Holy variable, God Almighty.

But lets say you are correct then the moon has moved out 45.625 inches in the last year alone, that means it has moved away from the earth 273,750 inches in the last 6,000 years. It has already moved to double the height of mount Everest. And it will move 190.104166666666667 feet i the next 50 years or 380.2083333333333 feet in 100, 760.416666666666667 feet in the nest 200 years, It will have lost it affect on the earth by the 50 year mark as it will no longer help our atmosphere or the tidal system if it moved out 190 feet.

Now if you want to know the real cause of global warming that would be it if it were true.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

And you fail at maths again.

1.5 inches per year

Multiply that by 600,000,000

And you end up with the moon being too far away for there to be a total solar eclipse.

a reply to: TerryDon79

Actually you have been wrong this whole time it is not moving away 1.5 inches per year according to your god the scientist.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

It's actually between 1.4 and 1.6 inches per year. That's why I say ROUGHLY 1.5 inches per year. Your number is completely off.

But no surprises you'd get that number wrong. You couldn't even get 600 million right lol.

a reply to: TerryDon79

Oh ho you have not been truthful you have been using a number that no scientist has used.

And you had to google it. I knew you were wrong all the time. that is why I used some phony numbers too.

If the moon did move 60 feet since 1967 we would be having some serious geophysical anomalies happening. Maybe that is the real cause of climate change and not man at all.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

1.5 is called an average. It's another English word. I don't expect you to understand.

BTW, if you want to get really technical, the moon is moving away at an ever decreasing rate, but also marginal that it makes little difference to the mathematical calculations of roughly 600,000,000 years.

Terry, now go to the models please the math will surprise you.

Seeing you have been quoting a fictitious number this whole time maybe some real true calculations is what you need.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

But I thought you said maths is wrong?

Be kind of pointless me checking on the maths if it's wrong.

ChesterJohns "logic" in this thread...

"Eclipses prove god with maths!"

"Maths is wrong!"

"Check the maths yourself. It's right!"

............................

Thanks for the laughs and exposing yourself as a pretend Christian. It's been a ball. And the "Maths is wrong! Check the maths!" was the best bit!