It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
a reply to: shawmanfromny
Hate to say it, but... fake news. There may well have been an inside leak, but this isn't evidence of it.
I agree , trust but verify. But , and there is always one , there is a term in law "preponderance of evidence" (even if circumstantial) . This can lead to a prosecution of law no matter what is "believed" by the populace.
Be careful when you state absolutes. As Forrest Gump said , "thats when it jumped up and bit me on the buttocks"
I think we all know it was not Russians. Without the servers, which are probably in little pieces somewhere, we will never know. The AG should have subpoenaed the servers the moment they alleged Russian interference instead of allowing the 3rd party investigation nonsense that happened.
Aside from that who is going to be prosecuted and for what? The whole point, in my opinion, in proving it wasn't Russians was to stop the asinine collusion narrative. The left has moved on to racism now because Russia was not flying with anybody except for rabid leftists.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
The only evidence needed to convict the DNC for falsifying the "Russia: narrative, is that they are calling it "a conspiracy theory".
If they had a real defense, they wouldn't need to rely on just calling it a conspiracy theory.
DNC=GUILTY
originally posted by: shawmanfromny
The chief researchers active on the DNC case are four: William Binney, formerly the NSA’s technical director for world geopolitical and military analysis
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: shawmanfromny
The chief researchers active on the DNC case are four: William Binney, formerly the NSA’s technical director for world geopolitical and military analysis
Binney is also the guy who claimed the Russians were not in Crimea when they invaded..Even wrote a letter to the Chancellor of Germany telling them to ignore US intelligence that Russians were on the ground there.
originally posted by: SpartanStoic
As a former IT professional with 1 foot still in tech, if those transfer speeds and data sizes are correct there is no way that data was moved over the internet. End of story. It's simply not possible with where those servers were located.
The fact that the server(s) are not in FBI hands for forensic IT inspection tells the whole story. It's a lie top to bottom.