It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Definition of a nazi

page: 2
13
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 06:40 AM
link   
Here's an interesting anecdote, when I was a kid this guy moved into our street.

I lived in a rough area in Glasgow, and this particular chap seemed out of place. He was English and polite for a start, dressed well. Lived alone.

My mates and I were kinda rough lads, early teens, and one night started to chat with him. He had an interesting past, had worked for British aerospace - a very well paid career, but for whatever reason had ended up moving to one of the hardest areas of Glasgow and was pretty much slumming it with the commoners, but he was vague as to why he ended up there.

So some people got it into their heads that he was a pedo...god only knows why, maybe it's because the only people who give him the time of day were a bunch of bored kids?

Anyway, long story short some older boys in their late teens got drunk one night and invaded his house, beat the crap out of him, smashed his house up and even knocked down a small brick wall surrounding his house.

We never saw him again...I've no idea if the allegations were true, or what they were based on. From what I gathered they were totally unfounded.

So, even if you know for a fact that someone is attracted to children, is it right to go 'round and beat them up?

It's a tough one...same with nazis - they're a potential danger. I'd punch a real nazi, but I'd need to be sure they were indeed a nazi, even then It's hard to call..maybe they just sympathise with certain nazi principles...not necessarily gonna start rounding up and putting jews in camps.

Is there a line? A crossover point where someone becomes punchable? Who is judging and labelling these nazis and how can we trust them and their judgement?

May be we need to all come to some agreement before we start whacking folk in the face or whatever.

Strange, some of the reactions to this thread. It's almost as if certain people want there to be nazis just so they have someone to persecute...which is kinda nazi-ish. Bizarre.




posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 07:27 AM
link   
I would say that calling somebody from the KKK or white supremacy groups "Nazis" is perhaps not entirely out of line, because there are a lot of similarities there, but Nazis are a very authoritarian, overtly racist, possibly genocidal, terroristic group. To call anybody not part of a group with similar characteristics, or philosophies that it espouses, a Nazi is extremely inappropriate.

The Nazis gased people with experimental gases, one of which literally melted them from the inside out. They committed unspeakable abominations against every God that has ever existed, unspeakable blasphemies with their experiments.

Quite frankly, if you call somebody a Nazi without decent evidence that they would be complicit or actively commit such acts, then you deserve to be punched. I would frankly argue that we should make it the white "n" word.



posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 07:52 AM
link   
a reply to: AnIntellectualRedneck

Certainly a more reasonable and well considered response.

I appreciate it and fully agree.

It's one of them words that shouldn't be used willy-nilly, there's not much room for escalation after nazi.

Thanks.



posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 07:53 AM
link   
The definition of the word 'nazi' is simple.

It's anyone that doesn't agree with left wing ideology.

Just as the planet is out to git everyone.

Just as the bankers are out to git everyone.

Just as evil corporations are out to git everyone.,

Just as evil gunz are out to git everyone.

natzees are out to git everyone.

And since these two words are synonymous with each other.



Professor Richard Griffiths of the University of Wales[66] wrote in 2005 that "fascism" is the "most misused, and over-used word, of our times".[26] "Fascist" is sometimes applied to post-World War II organizations and ways of thinking that academics more commonly term "neo-fascist".[67]


en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 08:10 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

It is starting to look like that.

This protest that erupted in violence where a crazy ran into a crowd of people with a car...as far as I know it was some protest about a statue.

But it's mostly being reported as a far-right, white supremacist protest. I don't believe all of the people there were KKK or white supremacists or nazis...pretty sure a lot were but not all.

It's akin to me claiming all muslims are terrorists when one ploughs a truck into a group of people on a sidewalk...and that's something that more than one muslim has done. But most reasonable folk agree that it certainly isn't all muslims and the far-left would go batcrap crazy if you said it was.

It's funny how the goalposts are continually moved to suit the same particular agenda, continuously. The double standards are so frequent it's little wonder people don't know whether they're coming or going.

One thing is abundantly clear - the rise and growth in popularity of far-right organisations is riding in the wake of the extreme left agenda...everyone can see it but not many are being honest about it. The more feverish they become the worse things have gotten.

Cheers.
edit on 19/8/2017 by LungFuMoShi because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 08:12 AM
link   
a reply to: LungFuMoShi


Is there a line? A crossover point where someone becomes punchable? Who is judging and labelling these nazis and how can we trust them and their judgement?


How can a person set a line? What if the supposed "nazi" is a woman? Or a disabled person? Or a smaller, frail person? Or an old man/woman?

How would one "know for a fact" something about someone, like the "maybe" pedo that you mentioned. Unfounded allegations without total absolute truth. Cops should have been called on him, if those older boys were right. Like if he had touched one of them inappropriately.

So much violence......never good.



posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 08:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: SR1TX

originally posted by: LungFuMoShi

originally posted by: LilFox
I beg to differ. The word fits.

noun, plural Nazis.
1.
a member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, which controlled Germany from 1933 to 1945 under Adolf Hitler and advocated totalitarian government, territorial expansion, anti-Semitism, and Aryan supremacy, all these leading directly to World War II and the Holocaust.
2.
(often lowercase) a person elsewhere who holds similar views.
3.
(often lowercase) Sometimes Offensive. a person who is fanatically dedicated to or seeks to regulate a specified activity, practice, etc.:
a jazz nazi who disdains other forms of music; health nazis trying to ban junk food.
adjective
4.
of or relating to the Nazis.


Similar views.

Ambiguous.

Convenient.

I'd say some BLM members harbour similar views...but against whites so that's ok.



Some BLM members are German from 1935?


Well then, you just shot your self in the foot.

Dont see that often here, well done.



posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 08:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: LungFuMoShi
I keep seeing threads about nazis.

Is it ok to punch a nazi? A nazi or white supremacist march in Charlottesville...nazis everywhere.

If I could go back to the early 40's and punch Hitler I'd do it...why? Because he was indeed, a nazi. He even had a uniform, with a swastika on it...he was the ultimate nazi - there's little room for doubt.

I don't think many of us have a problem with a genuine bona-fide nazi getting a smack in the chops if they're an actual nazi who is hell bent on pushing a ver far right wing agenda.

But it isn't that clear...I see a lot of people being called nazis, recently I saw a post on facebook where Tommy Robinson was called a nazi among other things. I wouldn't punch Tommy, in fact I'd shake his hand.

Maybe people need to be a bit clearer on what a nazi actually is before they decide whether or not that individual deserves to be punched or worse.

Nobody should be punching anyone until they know wtf they are talking about. Seems now that anyone who isn't far left or has even a tiny smidgen of conservatism is inherently far-right or just a plain ol' nazi. That's a lot of punches to be meted out. Why are even moderate conservatives now being treated like they're racist scumbags and being called white supremacists?

To me it looks like people simply standing up for themselves and pushing back. If a group of people...of mixed ethnicities/race get together and protest over some statue...saying nothing about race and colour can be branded white supremacists...why is it that a group of mostly black people...called black lives matter, who continually bang on about how white people are the devil, to blame for everything...in some cases claim whites are inferior, genetically - are not black supremacists?

So - to clarify, I'd punch a real nazi, you bet your cotton socks I would.

Maybe if we're honest...those "far-right" white supremacists are the ones who need to do a bit of punching...maybe some clarity and a little bit of soul searching is required.

If people can't be honest with themselves...what's even the point any more?

Maybe a slug fest is the only solution, maybe it's just a big competition to see who will rule all else? It's kinda starting to look that way if we're even questioning the validity of punching this one or that.

What a sh**show.


I write something about the left thats not even close to being hate speach or violent and it gets taken down the same day but others can write all day about how conservatives are nazis and wanna punch em and thats ok. Seems those who run ats lean left and dont like others opinions about those against there own views and micromanage. Anyway, i agree with your post. Btw, nazi germany was a socialist, they were far right onlu because fellow neighbors that were far left were communist. Nazi far right is not comparable to Americas far right. Libraries seem to hold more factual knowledge then google these days. People really need to start utilizing libraries again before google destroys them and dictates facts of life and real history.



posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 08:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: SR1TX
a reply to: LungFuMoShi

In a Luxury apt in Dtown Dallas. By myself.


Can you do us all a favour and get out?

"durrr youre 12 and what am I" isn't up for debate.



posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 08:45 AM
link   
a reply to: LungFuMoShi

Be careful when you fight the monsters, lest you become one.
Friedrich Nietzsche



And let us not forget the John Podesta emails?





edit on 19-8-2017 by seeker1963 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 08:58 AM
link   
a reply to: badw0lf

That dude clearly still thinks of his parents' house as "home" which speaks volumes about his outlook on life. Needs to learn that his own apartment is his home...and allow his parents to cut the apron strings once and for all.

It isn't difficult to conclude why he lives alone in that luxury apartment, I still like my bridge idea.



posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 09:02 AM
link   
Answer = Liberal Progressive.



posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 09:02 AM
link   
I hope I don't become a monster, or haven't already become one.

I get your point, though...succinct and eloquent. Maybe nobody should punch anyone - I guess that's why we in what we believe to be a civilised society leave the judging and meting out of punishment to the judges, jury's and courts of law.

I often think about that man who got beat up and had his home wrecked, were there any truth to the rumours and did he deserve that even if they were true? I'll never know the answers so it's an odd thing from the past that I'll most likely never see closure on.

Gut says no because some of us actually talked to the guy and he seemed decent enough...but we were young kids, maybe he just wanted someone to talk, or maybe he had sinister motives after all, who knows but certainly food for thought.

Thanks.



posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 09:09 AM
link   
a reply to: LungFuMoShi


Don't get me wrong. I have a whole lot of hate in my heart for those who seem hell bent on destroying freedom and liberty. These people who are pushing this destructive force on our Republic will soon hit a WALL. It's not if, it's just a matter of when......



posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 09:12 AM
link   
a reply to: LungFuMoShi

"Nazi" isn't a German word. Its western slang, ridiculing a 'party' of assholes. I know, my Grandfather was a card carrying member. The acronym for the Nazi party is NSDAP, National Socialist German Workers Party, how benign.

NAZI, is short for National Socialists. But everything in this country is becoming Nationalized (Federalized) too, Socialism is the creeping norm. We hide that behind euphemisms like Democracy, which we promise other countries we bomb and invade. Just like the Nazis did. Only they called it, Deutschland Ubbe Alles, Germany For All.



posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 09:24 AM
link   
sorry, duplicity
edit on 19-8-2017 by intrptr because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 09:38 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

That's actually quite an interesting and enlightening point.

Appreciate the input over the last page, this is a proper thread now.

Gracias!



posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 10:01 AM
link   
a reply to: LungFuMoShi


As Frank Zappa might say, "is that a real nazi or is that a sears nazi?"

Good points.




posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 10:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: LungFuMoShi

originally posted by: LilFox
I beg to differ. The word fits.

noun, plural Nazis.
1.
a member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, which controlled Germany from 1933 to 1945 under Adolf Hitler and advocated totalitarian government, territorial expansion, anti-Semitism, and Aryan supremacy, all these leading directly to World War II and the Holocaust.
2.
(often lowercase) a person elsewhere who holds similar views.
3.
(often lowercase) Sometimes Offensive. a person who is fanatically dedicated to or seeks to regulate a specified activity, practice, etc.:
a jazz nazi who disdains other forms of music; health nazis trying to ban junk food.
adjective
4.
of or relating to the Nazis.


Similar views.

Ambiguous.

Convenient.

I'd say some BLM members harbour similar views...but against whites so that's ok.


You have no agenda here but to support your nazi brethren by immediately equivocating them with BLM.

K~



posted on Aug, 19 2017 @ 12:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: aethertek

originally posted by: LungFuMoShi

originally posted by: LilFox
I beg to differ. The word fits.

noun, plural Nazis.
1.
a member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, which controlled Germany from 1933 to 1945 under Adolf Hitler and advocated totalitarian government, territorial expansion, anti-Semitism, and Aryan supremacy, all these leading directly to World War II and the Holocaust.
2.
(often lowercase) a person elsewhere who holds similar views.
3.
(often lowercase) Sometimes Offensive. a person who is fanatically dedicated to or seeks to regulate a specified activity, practice, etc.:
a jazz nazi who disdains other forms of music; health nazis trying to ban junk food.
adjective
4.
of or relating to the Nazis.


Similar views.

Ambiguous.

Convenient.

I'd say some BLM members harbour similar views...but against whites so that's ok.


You have no agenda here but to support your nazi brethren by immediately equivocating them with BLM.

K~


Please, ive met far more racist black people then white, yes, its possible for black people to be racist.




top topics



 
13
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join