It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Should we ban the Democratic Party?

page: 3
25
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:16 PM
link   
a reply to: mkultra11


Hell yea, while we are at banning things that are racist, how about Planned Parent Hood founded by Margaret Sanger who wanted to abort BLACK babies because she thought negroes were an inferior race?


Throw that at your Progressive representative who grandstands on race pimping!




posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:18 PM
link   
a reply to: CynConcepts

Puts Calexit in an interesting new light.



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: mkultra11

Pro Slavery
Pro segregation
Pro Jim Crow Law
Against the Civil Rights Act of 1965
Created the KKK
Created the welfare state



They also "own" all the high crime and high poverty corals in the big Democrat cities.

They have done zero to help.

The whole party is made up of pimple poppers that "think and lie" all the time.

Democrats own all the problems.




posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: theantediluvian

Almost a hundred years.

Rather slow for a bunch of progressives.

To suddenly be running around whining bout them.

By that same logic you could argue for slavery because it didn't bother anyone for hundreds of years.



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:19 PM
link   
a reply to: CynConcepts


I read this and think about sanctuary cities for illegal immigrants. Why? The civil war was more about states rebelling against federal rule of law. True... Many say it is different...but really? I find it ironic that those that are on the side of sanctuary cities fighting against the 'union' are the same ones who despise what the confederacy was fighting for...aka...state rights.


The only state right the seceding states were concerned with was preserving the institution of slavery. Please, don't take my word for it. Read what the states themselves declared the causes were in the Declaration of Causes of Seceding States.



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:19 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

Excellent ad-hom attack there.

You never let anybody down





posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:20 PM
link   
a reply to: seeker1963

Don't forget the Lincoln Memorial.

Cause he never believed in equal rights.

And the WHITE HOUSE while were at it.

Built by slaves.



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: CynConcepts

Puts Calexit in an interesting new light.


Like this?

Cali wants to secede from the fed union. Why?

Cali doesn't want to abide by federal laws. Views those laws as an aggression against their ideals. 1 Example: Immigration. 1 Argument: Immigrants do the work Americans won't.

Welcome to the Confederacy



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:20 PM
link   
a reply to: mkultra11

The south wanted perpetual slavery, huh? You don't know much about Lincoln. He didn't care about slavery. It was all economics. Slavery was already at a tipping point. It was just how to go about it without having a total collapse of the entire US economic system. The slaves had nowhere to go; no education; no skills. They might have perished. It's not a pretty history and it's not a simple history.



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: theantediluvian




2. Do you think that support for segregation was the conservative or progressive position?


Support for segregation is a 'progressive' position, and ALWAYS been one.

The hypenated american moniker.

African American.

Hispanic American.

The list goes on.

Because GD simply calling ourselves just American has been deemed to be 'offensive'.

The left is,has been, and always will be .

The party of segregation, and slavery.


Look no further than college campuses filled with progressives promoting segregation and racism.



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: mkultra11

No, that's not true either. Antifa aren't Democrats. In fact, they're anarchists. They don't even vote and if they did, they'd vote for some nightmare like Trump in hopes of expediting the collapse of the system. DERP.


Yeah they're anarchists alright.

Left Wing competitiveness at it's finest.




posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: eNumbra

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: theantediluvian

Almost a hundred years.

Rather slow for a bunch of progressives.

To suddenly be running around whining bout them.

By that same logic you could argue for slavery because it didn't bother anyone for hundreds of years.


Sure didn't bother the democrats.

Even up to the modern era.



BAN THEM!



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Abysha
a reply to: mkultra11

I'm down for removing either or both major parties. I don't which one but both would be best.

Something needs to change and removing the democrats will only help liberals in the long run.


Something needs to burn.




posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:23 PM
link   
Slavery was well on it's way out.

And hell with the invention of the cotton gin there was no effin need for it.



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: mkultra11
Considering the current logic of removing history relating to slavery in America, why isn't the Democratic Party banned as well? Think about it, they are solely responsible for our horrible post Civil War race relations and singlehandedly prevented African Americans from advancing in society.

Pro Slavery
Pro segregation
Pro Jim Crow Law
Against the Civil Rights Act of 1965
Created the KKK
Created the welfare state

If it weren't for Abraham Lincoln and the Republicans, the South would have secede and there would have been perpetual slavery like they wanted. Just some food for thought.


Forgot affirmative action.

That 'requirement' people be GIVEN jobs based on nothing more than their skin color.



Yeah.

The content of their character went out the window somehow.




posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:24 PM
link   
a reply to: links234

Yeah, turn the whole country into Idaho. No jobs, and no food stamps either.



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: mkultra11
Considering the current logic of removing history relating to slavery in America, why isn't the Democratic Party banned as well? Think about it, they are solely responsible for our horrible post Civil War race relations and singlehandedly prevented African Americans from advancing in society.

Pro Slavery
Pro segregation
Pro Jim Crow Law
Against the Civil Rights Act of 1965
Created the KKK
Created the welfare state

If it weren't for Abraham Lincoln and the Republicans, the South would have secede and there would have been perpetual slavery like they wanted. Just some food for thought.


Forgot affirmative action.

That 'requirement' people be GIVEN jobs based on nothing more than their skin color.



Yeah.

The content of their character went out the window somehow.



So did the content of their argument or lack their of.

Running around calling everyone they disagree with 'racist' and white supremacist,nazi is nothing more than an ad homenim.
edit on 17-8-2017 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: theantediluvian




2. Do you think that support for segregation was the conservative or progressive position?


Support for segregation is a 'progressive' position, and ALWAYS been one.

The hypenated american moniker.

African American.

Hispanic American.

The list goes on.

Because GD simply calling ourselves just American has been deemed to be 'offensive'.

The left is,has been, and always will be .

The party of segregation, and slavery.


It certainly is.

Just look at how they successfully herded their voters into the Democrat voting pockets !!




posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Justso
a reply to: mkultra11

The south wanted perpetual slavery, huh? You don't know much about Lincoln. He didn't care about slavery. It was all economics. Slavery was already at a tipping point. It was just how to go about it without having a total collapse of the entire US economic system. The slaves had nowhere to go; no education; no skills. They might have perished. It's not a pretty history and it's not a simple history.


Yes the South did. Are you suggesting that slavery was the only option ?



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 08:31 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen




Just look at how they successfully herded their voters into the Democrat voting pockets !!


How could they turn down all that free snip.

Free homes,free 'education', free healthcare,free money.

And the only thing they have to do is keep giving that bumper crop. Their vote to their masters.




top topics



 
25
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join