It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Should we ban the Democratic Party?

page: 1
25
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+13 more 
posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:33 PM
link   
Considering the current logic of removing history relating to slavery in America, why isn't the Democratic Party banned as well? Think about it, they are solely responsible for our horrible post Civil War race relations and singlehandedly prevented African Americans from advancing in society.

Pro Slavery
Pro segregation
Pro Jim Crow Law
Against the Civil Rights Act of 1965
Created the KKK
Created the welfare state

If it weren't for Abraham Lincoln and the Republicans, the South would have secede and there would have been perpetual slavery like they wanted. Just some food for thought.



+2 more 
posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:35 PM
link   
a reply to: mkultra11

They will never remove the party that they belong to that did everything they are against and are using to grow more laws and for us to lose more freedoms.



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:38 PM
link   
a reply to: mkultra11

Yes.
I don't need to say anymore other than.......YES!!!



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:41 PM
link   
a reply to: mkultra11

You forgot to mention they are responsible for BLM, and Antifa also.


+30 more 
posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:46 PM
link   
a reply to: mkultra11

Yet it's the Republican base who is losing its s# over defending statues of the Confederate generals. Generals who fought a war for the side who seceded from the Union because Lincoln was elected and they wanted to preserve the institution of slavery.

Monuments that were erected by pro-segregation Southerners in the time of Jim Crow laws, and in some cases — such as with Stone Mountain — on Klan lands. (Stone Mountain was the site of the founding of the modern Klan)

That should be a dead giveaway that something in your absurd low information yammering is amiss. Also, it was the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and it was Barry "Mr. Conservative" Goldwater's lack of support for it that cost him the election in what was the biggest landslide to that point.

You're clearly a sponge for stupid propaganda.

And as you try to lay claim to liberal progressive victories, you call for the eradication of the opposing party like the ultimate right-wing authoritarian.

Jesus.
edit on 2017-8-17 by theantediluvian because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3daysgone
a reply to: mkultra11

You forgot to mention they are responsible for BLM, and Antifa also.


Actually, that true they are promoting these groups and normalizing political violence by antifa. That also leads to another direction such as George Soros funding these groups for the sole purpose of sowing civil unrest and ultimately to destroy America.


+1 more 
posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:49 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

That's all you got?


+2 more 
posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:50 PM
link   
a reply to: mkultra11

Don't forget they gave us Senator Robert Byrd: Grand Cyclops of the KKK, Democrat President pro tem of the U.S. Senate...and Hillary Clinton's mentor.

edit on 17-8-2017 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)


+3 more 
posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:51 PM
link   
a reply to: mkultra11

No, that's not true either. Antifa aren't Democrats. In fact, they're anarchists. They don't even vote and if they did, they'd vote for some nightmare like Trump in hopes of expediting the collapse of the system. DERP.



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:52 PM
link   
a reply to: mkultra11

Seems as if people who are drawn to be a democrat includes people who like to initiate hate and form groups based around that hate. Maybe they just like violence?



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:53 PM
link   
a reply to: mkultra11

I'm down for removing either or both major parties. I don't which one but both would be best.

Something needs to change and removing the democrats will only help liberals in the long run.



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:54 PM
link   
a reply to: mkultra11

We shouldn't ban anything, but I suspect sooner or later roving mobs of barbarians will start taking a swipe at it.



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:54 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

Anarchists are very liberal with their violence.


+1 more 
posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:54 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian




Yet it's the Republican base who is losing its s# over defending statues of the Confederate generals.


And who is the people right now acting like the ISIS and the Taliban trying to erase history they don't like ?

That would be the left. The democratic party.

Because there can't be any reminders THEY were on the wrong side.
edit on 17-8-2017 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:55 PM
link   
Bingo bango right on the $



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Abysha

Yeah. I agree. Both Republicans and Democrats and their views of how the country should be run has ran their course. Something else entirely needs to be come up with.



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: mkultra11
Considering the current logic of removing history relating to slavery in America, why isn't the Democratic Party banned as well? Think about it, they are solely responsible for our horrible post Civil War race relations and singlehandedly prevented African Americans from advancing in society.

Pro Slavery
Pro segregation
Pro Jim Crow Law
Against the Civil Rights Act of 1965
Created the KKK
Created the welfare state

If it weren't for Abraham Lincoln and the Republicans, the South would have secede and there would have been perpetual slavery like they wanted. Just some food for thought.


Forgot affirmative action.

That 'requirement' people be GIVEN jobs based on nothing more than their skin color.



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:57 PM
link   
a reply to: mkultra11

1. Do you think that support for slavery was the conservative or progressive position?

2. Do you think that support for segregation was the conservative or progressive position?

Answer those two questions honestly and maybe we can talk.



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:58 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

That is some straight shooting.

I have never thought of that perspective.



posted on Aug, 17 2017 @ 07:58 PM
link   
Maybe we should rename both to the Demo Party and Repo Party?




top topics



 
25
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join