It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SoDumb
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: SoDumb
a reply to: DBCowboy
It's more about the pride it gives current racists, to see a glorious depiction of a previous racist.
It's empowering.
How is a Swastika racist? It's not even tangible, just a symbol? Same reason.
Yes, it's remained all this time only to provide racists with glory. .... ...........
...no? You think everything is a duality? Like, it's not x reason, so MUST be y reason?
It was unnoticed. Now it's relevant, so people act.
It was unnoticed. Now it's relevant, so people act.
originally posted by: SoDumb
a reply to: DBCowboy
-shrug-
Again, I'm not for it's removal. Just against the idea removing it means anything in reality.
A museum is where things that a culturally inappropriate belong if they have historical significance. Not public space.
originally posted by: SoDumb
a reply to: DBCowboy
a museum is public space designated for that kind of stuff, not just any public space.
Or are we really going to hash what a museum vs public space means?
originally posted by: SoDumb
a reply to: DBCowboy
To me, I'd rather it exist, and if it's actually offensive(Like people ACTUALLY complained about it), then I'd rather have it in a museum than destroyed. At what cost is freedom? The tally is currently 1 statue.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
I've said it before and I will say it again.
"We must preserve our history, good or bad. Destruction of history is the trail head to our own destruction."
How long until someone decides to destroy some aspect of YOUR own history because it offends them?
What next, books about the Civil War should be removed from the library, or burned because they offend someone?
SMH
People, , think, before acting out your anger in this manner.