Originally posted by marg6043
There you have it for the inner city and public work.
No, it said
local police agencies, not metropolitan police agencies. Nothing to with inner cities.
There you go for the security in your neighbordhood.
Why Marg? Are immigrants more likely to commit crimes? Crimes are crimes, regardless of
who commits them. You want security in your neighborhood? Eliminate laws create "victimless crime" Half of law enforcement spending goes to stopping
people who hurt only themselves. That doesn’t leave much for murderers, rapists and child molesters. Stop trying to throw money at a broken system,
stop the knee jerk reactions to social problems.
The next time you go fishing do not eat the fish it may kill you.
You tell me what they are doing to fix environmental problems right now. When the EPA was created, the quality of air was getting better, and fast. As
soon as the EPA was created, that stopped, and it more or less leveled out. Sound like something you want to keep throwing your money at?
Let’s keep the children dump but we are going to educate the Iraqi children.
What the hell does the BIA have to do with children? OK, I get it, you must be talking about when the BIA pulled my grandfather from his parents and
sent him to a protestant school for Indian boys, cut his hair, put him in slacks, told him his parents were savages and refused to let him practice
his religion or speak his language. Oh,
that Bureau of Indian Affairs! Yeah lets throw more money their way, us injins need more control, we
need the BIA to make sure we only devote 10% of language training in our schools to native language (because it is extra-curricular, a foreign
language!) and 90% to English. None of their damn business. They are culture killers, and they don’t deserve anyone’s money to help keep them in
business. They are just as bad now as 100 years ago, just a little more PC. Educate yourself before you open your mouth to things you know nothing
of!
The AARP are going to have a good time with this one, and what can I said they are already poor it can not hurt taken away some more of their
benefits.
What, the great and powerful social security program isn’t enough to even keep them warm? Well then, let’s just keep it, and make extra programs
to fund what it fails to do. Sound fiscal ideas there.
This is part of the “faith base programs” that he is encouraging from churches in communities.
And it falls on the discretion of the individual governments to give away money as it see it fit.
Do you know this for sure? Even so, it is not his denomination he wants to see in the communities. As you said "Churches in communities." That means
their
own churches. Not that I am for giving any tax money to any church, just don’t spread falsehoods in the name of your ideology.
Think things through. You seem to have a tendency to make knee jerk reactions to things you don’t like on the surface. Think with your head and not
your heart, and you will do more good for those you wish to stand up for.