It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

You are now the Leader of the US, explain how YOU would deal with DRPK.

page: 5
19
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 06:58 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy


Never.

...There is no winner in a nuclear war.




Agreed.


But I say that sitting in my living room with my feet up on the sofa.


I don't think nuclear war cares one way or the other.
edit on 11-8-2017 by Liquesence because: (no reason given)




posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 06:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
but nukes? No way. You risk irradiating our allies

You know absolutely nothing of nuclear weapons.



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 06:59 PM
link   
a reply to: dragonridr

Well your plan has already failed because you don't make any backup plans. What happens when your direct and stupid attack fails,right they fire off nukes. The point is to prevent nukes being used mate,my plans might not be the best thought out but what do you expect from a 5 minute coffee break.

You need multiple angles of attack you can't just be thinking about direct methods,those will attract the attention of the Chinese and cause an additional #firestorm. You need as many options as possible to take out Kim discreetly unless you rather wait for them to attack first in which case we already lost if a nuke hits American soil or that of our allies.
edit on 11-8-2017 by VashTheStampede because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 07:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
I should read your posts more.

We'd have a level playing field then.


ETA: Well ... I am drinking rum. A wonderful Kirk and Sweeney 23. I understand if you're trying to keep up.



edit on 1182017 by Snarl because: ETA



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 07:05 PM
link   
After the nukes...then what?

Bio Chem? When the gloves come off, Apocalypse Now...

"Something Evil this way Comes"
edit on 11-8-2017 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 07:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Misterlondon


Then you are no better than the little man in question.


The question didn't include any little man. The OP was pretty explicit in posing the question to ATS in the 'second person.'

Scorched earth does not automatically mean nuclear destruction.

I am very pleased with the way our president is responding to the veiled threats coming out of Pyongyang. For someone who inherited the problem of a rouge nation threatening the US with nuclear capable ICBMs, President Trump has (insofar) responded perfectly.

We have the means to destroy Pyongyang without the use of nuclear weapons. The only tricky part would be to take out Lil Kim without incidentally taking out innocent NK citizens.

And I shutter to think where we would be if we had Hillary in charge, or even worse, if we had Obama in charge.


edit on 8/11/2017 by ColdWisdom because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 07:09 PM
link   
If Trump had his way...



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 07:12 PM
link   
There will be no nuclear war.
If they shoot what they say they will near Guam...
The # that comes out of the sky back at them will serve as justification for why we kept A51, S4 and the surrounding areas under such deep wraps.

Keep calm. Only an idiot would screw with this stuff. (Whoops...)



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 07:16 PM
link   
a reply to: ColdWisdom

You're pleased that Trump is feeding the NK Troll?

Obama wasn't that stupid. Hillary wouldn't have been that stupid.

Trump can't seem to be the bigger man and approach this intelligently. He's just shooting back with garbage of his own to match Lil Kim.
edit on 11-8-2017 by introvert because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 07:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: ColdWisdom

You're pleased that Trump is feeding the NK Troll?

Obama wasn't that stupid. Hillary wouldn't have been that stupid.

Trump can't seem to be the bigger man and approach this intelligently. He's just shooting back with garbage of his own to match Lil Kim.


Trolls will be trolls.

"_________is to North Korea as Donald Trump is to the United States."



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 07:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: Snarl

originally posted by: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
but nukes? No way. You risk irradiating our allies

You know absolutely nothing of nuclear weapons.


You're an expert?



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 07:30 PM
link   
I have a theory.

I call it "The Tiny Testicle" theory.

North Korea didn't attack the US when a "Tiny Testicle'd" Obama was in office. And they could have with more leeway.

But now?

They certainly aren't going to attack with a "Crazy-man" Trump in office.

Therefore, no attack. Just theatre.




posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 07:32 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

You forgot that Kim has bigger hands than Trump.



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 07:33 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude


Put Kim on the hot seat. Accuse the little man of putting the whole world in a bad position. Call for a national boycott of Chines goods LOL. Deliver 100 Abrams tanks to SK. Pull a NATO exercise in SK near the DMC.



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 07:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Snarl

originally posted by: Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
but nukes? No way. You risk irradiating our allies

You know absolutely nothing of nuclear weapons.


You're an expert?

What did I say?



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 07:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: DBCowboy

You forgot that Kim has bigger hands than Trump.


But their hair is neck in neck.....



(er, hair in hair).



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 07:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Liquesence

They're perfectly save, which is why the nuclear winter will be used to counter global warming to the effect, that they will negate each other. And the important humans, aka the richest rich, don't need to worry about radiation with a tad of gene therapy once in a while. We can do this!

#RadiantNewNorthernHemisphere
edit on 11-8-2017 by PublicOpinion because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 07:45 PM
link   
maybe just call and say "what's up? wanna talk about all this nonsense?"



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 07:53 PM
link   
can't make first move or the fault will be ours
siege them...just wait till they starve out which they will attack out of hunger
can't nuke them as there are other non-Muslim-majority countries around
Invent and spread the 'Made in China' zombie virus to them



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 07:54 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

Direct talks between me and Kim J. Un.
We meet in CHINA in a Secret meeting with interpreters with leadership from CHINA & JAPAN. And basically have a serious discussion about why Kim hates the US or seems to and why US leadership has issues with NK.
We talk face to face like mature beings.
I stress to Kim that I don't want to destroy more of humanity fighting with him military wise, but I will not accept his tough rhetoric threatening my country or allies interest.
I will ask Kim is war what you really want face to face with all present officials there to witness and tell him war is not what I want. But reiterate that he cannot continue to make offensive military postures to attempt to scare my country or the allies of it...
I would then request that CHINA help guide NK with more logical country development processes that eliminate the threat issues & increase maturity from NK.
And then I would listen to what Kim J. Un has to say.

And follow up with next steps required depending on how the secret meetings went.

These meetings should take as much time and energy if not more as it takes for a jury to come to a consensus on a trial.
But at least we are trying to take all possible measures before the lurking Wales stop lurking and start booming
Which then endangers humanity more if other foreign Wales join in and start booming also.

All battles are not won by brute force the psychological aspects of warfare save more lives and causes less environmental stress...
edit on 8/11/17 by Ophiuchus 13 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
19
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join