It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Former NSA Experts: It Wasn't Russia. It Wasn't Even A Hack. It Was A Leak.

page: 12
67
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 08:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: HorizonFall
a reply to: Gryphon66

You are detracting from said topic by bringing up irrelevant points from sources who have no more knowledge of the issue than those which the OP provided.

You should look up the definition for condescension.


That's all that poster does in thread after thread.




posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 08:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: HorizonFall
a reply to: Gryphon66

You are detracting from said topic by bringing up irrelevant points from sources who have no more knowledge of the issue than those which the OP provided.

You should look up the definition for condescension.


That's all that poster does in thread after thread.


And what do you do?

Chase around looking for it?

Interestingly, the points are only "irrelevant" to the Trump cultists who can't accept ANYTHING other than praise for the Glorious Leader.

I'm amazed, honestly, that you follow my posts so closely. On average, I provide direct citations for my statements about 60-70% of the time.

How many threads do you pop up in merely to glad-hand other posters off-topic BS?

By the way, have you any thoughts on the veracity of the OP's article? I'd love to hear your take on it.



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 08:52 PM
link   
See, proved my point, lol.



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 08:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: MysticPearl
See, proved my point, lol.


Har har.

Yep, and you proved mine.



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 08:55 PM
link   
a reply to: MysticPearl

Yup, notice the mini mod attempts.

Lol



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 08:56 PM
link   
I'll return to the basic question at the heart of the matter of the OP's article:

Why do any of you believe the findings of an unnamed source based on analysis of information that was not shared, based on the documents from "Gruccifer" that THE SAME ARTICLE states were falsified.

Please explain why any rational person would take that nonsense seriously.



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 08:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: MysticPearl

Yup, notice the mini mod attempts.

Lol



And again, notice that you're contributing NOTHING to the topic of discussion, merely "stating your mind about other posters."

You folks just keep on proving me right, LOL



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 09:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: MysticPearl
See, proved my point, lol.


Har har.

Yep, and you proved mine.


Taking your opponent's assertion and deflecting it back then claiming it as your own. Straight out of Rules For Radicals...



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 09:03 PM
link   
Yet, let's make a prediction. This nonsense article will fall into the dustbin of a 24 hr. news cycle. The right-wing media will move on to something else to distract from the Trump Russia Scandal ... and all that will be left here is that certain members will, henceforth, cite that "it's been proven to be a leak, not a hack" when of course, nothing of the sort has been proven.

Or even stands up to the most shallow examination.



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 09:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: HorizonFall

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: MysticPearl
See, proved my point, lol.


Har har.

Yep, and you proved mine.


Taking your opponent's assertion and deflecting it back then claiming it as your own. Straight out of Rules For Radicals...


I'll take your word on it. You and Glenn Beck are the only folks I know that have read it.

/shrug

ETA: Oh, back to ignoring you.
edit on 11-8-2017 by Gryphon66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 09:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: HorizonFall

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: MysticPearl
See, proved my point, lol.


Har har.

Yep, and you proved mine.


Taking your opponent's assertion and deflecting it back then claiming it as your own. Straight out of Rules For Radicals...


ETA: Oh, back to ignoring you.


So you'll break your own rules to prove your point but not to engage in any logical or meaningful way. Gotcha.

Still waiting on the response to my list of Clinton scandals... Oh right. I'm being ignored.

Once again. Not surprised. Forever stuck in double standards.



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 09:23 PM
link   
Meanwhile, in the real world, Special Counsel Mueller continues his investigation into the (alleged) non-existent Russian interference.

Trump's own CIA director Pompeo has admitted that the Russian hacks happened:



Pompeo told the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that he embraced those findings as spelled out in a comprehensive report of the intelligence community on the Russian breaches compiled earlier this month.

"With respect to this report in particular, it's pretty clear about what took place here, about Russian involvement in efforts to hack information and to have an impact on American democracy," he said in response to questioning. "This was an aggressive action taken by senior leadership inside of Russia."


CNN

And, of course, Trump himself has admitted that the Russians attacked our Electoral process ...

Trump Tweet

Yet, the faithful are STILL trying desperately to deny the facts.

You can't make this up.
edit on 11-8-2017 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 09:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66




a comprehensive report of the intelligence community...

"With respect to this report in particular..."


You can't make this up.


You sure about that, skippy?


edit on 11-8-2017 by HorizonFall because: (no reason given)

edit on 11-8-2017 by HorizonFall because: This is not a mobile friendly website...



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 09:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Ooh intelligence opinions. Wow. They also told us that they thought Iraq did 9/11.

Are these computer specialists? There is a laughable lack of reason based off more than "intelligence" guesstimates.

Most people dont know this, but the intel community doesnt think like a lawyer, looking for absolute proof.

They wing it many times and only look to convince themselves and a superior. Depends on the situation but that is true world wide.

Its alarming how much they stand out.

edit on 8 11 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 09:39 PM
link   
a reply to: tadaman

And we all know how forthcoming and impartial they have been throughout this whole process...

Now try asking him if we'll get to see these "comprehensive reports". Or are we just supposed to take their word for it as we have been all along?



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 09:43 PM
link   
a reply to: HorizonFall

Dude, the reports are like fricking pep talks. They arent "reports".

All they do is repeat the same info and say to be more adamant about it all.

Its pathetic.

Cry wolf louder!! Derp.


edit on 8 11 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 09:47 PM
link   
a reply to: tadaman

And let's not forget the fact that this entire Russia narrative is being used to distract from the actual content of the leaks themselves...



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 09:50 PM
link   
a reply to: HorizonFall

What's in them?



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 09:56 PM
link   
a reply to: HorizonFall

Right. By the time they get to actual criminality the people involved will retire after doing the same crap for many successful years.


edit on 8 11 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2017 @ 09:57 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

For one, that John Podesta likes to employ 6 year old children for entertainment in his heated pool at 11pm at night...







 
67
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join