It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: bknapple32
And this is the crux of the situation. The ones screaming the loudest about going to war won't be within 5,000 miles of the front lines. Just a bunch of armchair warriors in my opinion, doing nothing to help the problem, just sitting back and enjoying everyone else but themselves dying.
originally posted by: Willtell
Trump should call a summit
The Russians, Chinese, The US, North Koreans, South Koreans, the Japanese heads of state and foreign ministers should stay in a room until this is settled
If it works Trump might be considered for a Nobel peace prize
We could honestly be proud of Trump about something.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
originally posted by: Willtell
Trump should call a summit
The Russians, Chinese, The US, North Koreans, South Koreans, the Japanese heads of state and foreign ministers should stay in a room until this is settled
If it works Trump might be considered for a Nobel peace prize
We could honestly be proud of Trump about something.
Not heard of the Six-Party-Talks.
I didn't work.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Denoli
You forgot
"The likes of which the world has never seen."
Is he threatening nukes? Is that moron actually threatening to use nukes?
Because he's in a pissing contest with a crazy person???
No a nice little sniper will do just fine I think.
Trump pull yourself together dude.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: xuenchen
I don't follow. What did I miss about Switzerland?
originally posted by: Grambler
But I don't get what people want Trump to do?
Should he pass this situation to the next administration and do nothing as past administrations have done?
If he does that, there is a good chance that Japan will decide to arm, which may escalate tensions in the entire region.
And 8 years from now, NK will have even better weapons and will be more aggressive.
Should he have said nothing, and just attacked NK?
It seems many on here have a problem with Trumps "big mouth". So would you rather he just bomb NK rather than saber rattle?
Should he just sanction NK or China.
It seems obvious NK sanctions have no effect. And sanctions on China could not on;y do nothing to help this situation, but create a whole new set of economic problems and raise hostilities with China.
I feel like many of the people criticizing Trump over this have no idea what they would like to see him do; they just no they will blame him for any bad outcome.
If he tries only diplomacy and being very nice to NK, and in the future they attack someone, he will be faulted. If he is aggressive and it results in bloodshed, he will be faulted.
originally posted by: bknapple32
originally posted by: Bone75
originally posted by: bknapple32
WE didnt elect the leader of NK. Are you really serious using that argument?
No, but we did elect a man who promised to crack down on NK.
Perhaps the North Koreans should replace their leader with someone who promises to stop provoking the US?
I see you dont fully grasp North Korean politics.......
originally posted by: silo13
originally posted by: knoxie
didn't he say something like "if we've got them why not use them" during the campaign?? he's an idiot.
Your reaction leads me to believe if (he) the President 'uses' them, you'll whine. And if he (the President) does not, you'll call into question his manhood.
Damned if you do and damned if you don't is what got the world into the fix it's in. Thanks for helping.
(/sarcasm)
peace
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: alphabetaone
Fair enough.
Are you saying that he should have preemptively struck NK, or did nothing?
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: alphabetaone
Fair enough.
Are you saying that he should have preemptively struck NK, or did nothing?
That he absolutely should have pre-emptively struck North Korea.
originally posted by: bknapple32
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: alphabetaone
Fair enough.
Are you saying that he should have preemptively struck NK, or did nothing?
That he absolutely should have pre-emptively struck North Korea.
Its a good thing you arent in charge