It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Four People Charged By DOJ In Leak Crackdown

page: 3
27
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 5 2017 @ 03:38 PM
link   
People who during the Hilary Scandal cried foul because of the Leaks that were released via WikiLeaks but did not focus on the material within...... are immoral to their very soul if they are now focused on the material within the Trump leaks and are celebrating the Leakers. People whose convictions change with the prevailing wind..... have no convictions at all and their words can not be trusted. Consistency is important if you wish people to consider your point of view

When your beliefs and convictions are sincere..... they are not redefined based on party affiliation.

If it is bad when Mr.Jones beats his wife, it is also bad when Mr.Smith does it. Even if Mr.Smith is your most favorite uncle....




posted on Aug, 5 2017 @ 07:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Zimnydran

These leaks are coming directly from the White House in real time.



posted on Aug, 5 2017 @ 11:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: burntheships

Faith in government +400




Faith in US MSM Media - 401

Since they are not reporting on it ...

The MSM certainly reported it at the time it happened, all of which was a while ago.

Reality Winner, the only one who is really a “leaker,” was indicted June 5: www.cnn.com...

The others are straight-up espionage, all of them from over a month ago.
Candace Marie Claiborne, indicted March 29: www.nytimes.com...

Kevin Patrick MallorY, indicted June 22: wapo.st...

Harold Thomas Martin III, indicted February 8:
www.npr.org...
edit on 5-8-2017 by nataylor because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 6 2017 @ 04:04 AM
link   
Time to start giving polygraph tests to the people with a confidential, secret, top secret and sci security clearance.



posted on Aug, 7 2017 @ 02:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: Zimnydran

These leaks are coming directly from the White House in real time.



This is hilarious...

There are TWO types of leaks..

One has to do with National Security..

The other has to do with exposing In-Fighting, Incompetence, Palace intrigue etc.

The leaks the WH is suffering from have to do with EMBARRASSEMENT..

BTW- If I was to place a bet..The conversations POTUS had with leaders of Australia and Mexico?

I think Scarmucci, the"mooch"..leaked those transcripts as a eff-u to the Trump administration after his record fast firing.

The timing was right on and he would have had full access and little to fear once he was no longer in the building and subject to "crack down".

The REAL issue here is that Trump can not instill loyalty from his people.
He demands it, but does not earn it, nor offer it in return.


The bulk of these are leaks about TRUMP...not national security etc.


edit on 7-8-2017 by soberbacchus because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 7 2017 @ 05:09 PM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus

Uhm no - Not when the leaks deal with speaking to foreign leaders.

Nice try though.



posted on Aug, 7 2017 @ 05:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: soberbacchus

Uhm no - Not when the leaks deal with speaking to foreign leaders.



I think the leaks of transcripts between trump and the Leaders of Mexico and Australia was a patriot screaming for help.

I mean...seriously. Trump is dangerously incompetent and unable to have rational discussions or comprehend simple concepts.

Trump is a one-man clear and present danger to the USA.



posted on Aug, 7 2017 @ 05:47 PM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus

No - it was a leak of sensitive national security information. At some point the left needs to realize they are destroying this country with their actions against Trump.

They are not "resistance". They are in fact a "5th column" and should be treated accordingly.



posted on Aug, 7 2017 @ 05:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: soberbacchus

No - it was a leak of sensitive national security information. At some point the left needs to realize they are destroying this country with their actions against Trump.



The leak of Transcripts of his calls with the leaders of Mexico and Australia was not related to "National Security" unless you think that revealing the depth of stupidity and ignorance of our current President is a threat to our National Security, then I might agree.



posted on Aug, 7 2017 @ 05:56 PM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus

Phone calls between potus and foreign leaders are classified and they have national security implications. If you are going to argue a point maybe you should understand what it is you are talking about.

If our president is that stupid and ignorant and still beat Clinton, the she and those who follow her have some serious issues.



posted on Aug, 7 2017 @ 06:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: soberbacchus

If our president is that stupid and ignorant and still beat Clinton.


Yes...he is..Frighteningly so.



posted on Aug, 7 2017 @ 07:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: soberbacchus

If our president is that stupid and ignorant and still beat Clinton.


Yes...he is..Frighteningly so.



Which means the nation did right by electing him instead of Clinton.



posted on Aug, 7 2017 @ 07:03 PM
link   
While it's a great appeteaser I would like just a little more meat on my bone if you know what I mean...



posted on Aug, 7 2017 @ 07:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: soberbacchus

No - it was a leak of sensitive national security information. At some point the left needs to realize they are destroying this country with their actions against Trump.

They are not "resistance". They are in fact a "5th column" and should be treated accordingly.


That's dangerously radical sounding....



posted on Aug, 7 2017 @ 07:59 PM
link   
a reply to: DanteGaland

The truth often is... There is a difference between resistance and a 5th column.



posted on Aug, 8 2017 @ 06:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

The Nation elected Clinton. The system elected Trump.

A lot of people believed Trump would change after he was elected, he would 'become' presidential. Also, people hated Clinton for a lot of reasons; whether it be DNC malfeasance during the primaries or gas-lighting Benghazi. When was the last Benghazi hearing?

The two-party system kicked us all again, people voted for Trump because he wasn't Clinton.

Trump also had the advantage of a crowded GOP primary. He didn't start taking more than 50% of the vote until after he'd already won almost all of the delegates. Even after it was all said and done he'd only gotten 44.9% of all the votes cast.

He was never elected by majority.



posted on Aug, 8 2017 @ 07:28 PM
link   
a reply to: links234

California TRIED to elect Clinton.

They failed.

Calif and NY don't run the whole country.




posted on Aug, 8 2017 @ 07:38 PM
link   
a reply to: links234

Correction, the system wanted Hillary. The system got her past Bernie, but couldn't get her past Trump. The people of the United States voted Trump in a National Election.



posted on Aug, 8 2017 @ 07:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: soberbacchus

No - it was a leak of sensitive national security information. At some point the left needs to realize they are destroying this country with their actions against Trump.



The leak of Transcripts of his calls with the leaders of Mexico and Australia was not related to "National Security" unless you think that revealing the depth of stupidity and ignorance of our current President is a threat to our National Security, then I might agree.


Of course it's a threat to National Security to have this leaked. That goes for any President including Obama. Just because it's Trump and you hate him doesn't make it ok.



posted on Aug, 8 2017 @ 07:54 PM
link   
a reply to: nataylor

Good links, I was wrong then.



I'll admit it!




top topics



 
27
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join